We comment on the article by Zagaria et al., which explicates the ““soft” nature of psychology: a minor consensus in its “core”” (Zagaria et al., p. 1), manifested by the discordant character of definitions of psychological “core-constructs”. Zagaria et al. build on the assumption that psychological science should reside in the status of a paradigm, meanwhile the real state of things they consider as pre-paradigmatic, imperfect and unhealthy, from which a transition to a paradigm is necessary. We cannot agree with this provision. We argue that not internal coherence and consistency, but the ability to reflect multifaceted reality, to answer its innovative manifestations in various dimensions and solve tasks that life poses to humanity with an adequate set of different tools not reducible to a single approach, is what makes the value of science. Psychology originally developed as poly paradigmatic science, because its subject has a most complex nature, holistic, yet incorporating many aspects different in their essence and, therefore, requiring different versions of the methodology. Considering epistemology of psychological science from the philosophical perspective implying special focus on the ontological issues, we argue that poly paradigmatic structure of psychology is a virtue, not weakness. Thanks to such a structure, modular, like a Swiss knife, our science may offer the most effective solutions for a variety of problems. Multiplicity of relative approaches is best fit for life and innovation, even though we have to sacrifice rigor and concordance of definitions in introductory textbooks.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
De Luca Picione, R. (2015). The idiographic approach in psychological research. the challenge of overcoming old distinctions without risking to homogenize. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science,49(3), 360–70.
Deloitte. (2017). Rewriting the rules for the digital age 2017: Deloitte global human capital trends. Deloitte University Press.
Kuzminov, Y., Sorokin, P., & Froumin, I. (2019). Generic and specific skills as components of human capital: new challenges for education theory and practice. Foresight and STI Governance,13(2), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.19.41
Mironenko, I. A. (2016). Revival of Christian Orthodox Psychology in Post-Soviet Russia // ESHHS and CHEIRON joint conference, June 27 to July 1, 2016, the Centre for History of Science (CEHIC) (pp. 81–82). Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Mironenko, I. A. (2017). Concerning the importance of ontological issues for cultural psychology: a reply to comments. Integrаtive Psychological and Behavioral Science,51(3), 496–504.
Mironenko, I. A., & Sorokin, P. S. (2018). Seeking for the definition of “Culture”: current concerns and their implications. A comment on Gustav Jahoda’s article “Critical reflections on some recent definitions of ‘‘culture’’”. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 52(2), 331–340
Schneider, J., Atallah, J., & Levine, J. D. (2017). Social structure and indirect genetic effects: genetics of social behaviour. Biological Reviews, 92(2), 1027–1038.
Schwartz, M., & Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (Eds.). (2019). Dancing with Sophia: Integral philosophy on the verge. Albany: SUNY Press.
Sorokin, P. (2015). The Russian sociological tradition from the XIXth century until the present: Key features and possible value for current discussions. The American Sociologist, 46(3), 341–355.
Sorokin, P. (2018). The ethical challenge for sociology in the face of global modernity: Toward solidarity-oriented and ethically contextualized practice. The American Sociologist, 49(3), 414–433.
Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0
Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Valsiner, J. (2010). Integrating Psychology within the Globalizing World: A Requiem to the Post-Modernist Experiment with Wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43(1), 1–21.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1927). The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. Downloaded from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/.
Zagaria, A., Andò, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A Giant with Feet of Clay. Integrаtive Psychological and Behavioral Science.
We wish to thank Jaan Valsiner for his invitation to write this paper.
Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project № 20-013-00260. Basic Research Program at the NRU HSE (Academic Excellence Project '5-100').
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mironenko, I.A., Sorokin, P.S. Concerning Paradigmatic Status of Psychological Science: For a Flexible and Flowing Psychology in the Face of Practical and Theoretical Challenges. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 604–612 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09530-7
- Paradigms in psychology
- Crisis of psychology
- Philosophy of science
- Evolution of science
- Changing modernity