Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Defining Behavior and its Relationship to the Science of Psychology

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even though the concept of behavior is central to modern psychology, there is no consensus regarding what the term behavior means. The current paper focuses on disentangling two separate conceptions of the term that have added to the confusion. One meaning of the term behavior pertains to natural scientific epistemology, specifically the requirements of empirical methodology and its reliance on data that are measurable and available to public observation. The second meaning pertains to ontology and relates to the fact that at a descriptive level there are different kinds of behavioral patterns in the universe. Put simply, inanimate material objects behave differently from living organisms, which behave differently from animals, which behave differently from people. This paper introduces a “Periodic Table of Behavior” derived from Henriques’, Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182, (2003, 2011) Tree of Knowledge System to map the different kinds of behaviors that are described and examined by different sciences. It concludes by using the formulation to clarify the relationship between the methodological and ontological description of behavior and argues how the basic science of psychology can be effectively defined as the science of mental behavior going forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. NY: Guilford Press.

  • Barkana, R. (2006). The first stars in the universe and cosmic reionization. Science, 313, 931–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, R. (2011). What is behavior? And so what? New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. (2009). Wetware: A Computer in every Living Cell. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breydo, L., Sales, E., Frege, T., Howell, M. C., Zaslavsky, B. Y., & Uversky, V. N. (2015). Effects of polymer hydrophobicity on protein structure and aggregation kinetics in a crowded milieu. Biochemistry, 54, 2957–2966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives in Psychological Science 2, 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoone, L. (2013). Orders of nature. New York: Stony Brook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka, L. (2017). Bee cognition. Current Biology, 27(19), R1049–R1059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D. (2018). Origin story: The big history of everything. New York: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. (2017). Origin of singularity in big bang theory from zero point energy. Canadian Journal of Physics, 95, 767–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2011). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter (p. 2011). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2014). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Penguin books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, M. S., Papineau, D., Grenne, T., Slack, J., Rittner, M., Pirajno, F., O’Neil, J., & Little, C. T. S. (2017). Evidence for early life in earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Nature, 543, 60–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, R. H. (2018). Essentials of psychology: The science of behavior. New York: BVT Publishing.

  • Farnsworth, K. D., Nelson, J., & Gershenson, C. (2013). Living is information processing: From molecules to global systems. Acta Biotheoretica, 61, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A., & Sullivan, W. T., III. (2016). A new empirical constraint on the prevalence of technological species in the universe. Astrobiology, 16, 359–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2004). Psychology defined. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1207–1221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson’s consilience with the tree of knowledge system. Theory and Psychology, 18, 731–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2017). Character adaptation systems theory: A new big five for personality and psychotherapy. Review of General Psychology, 21, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R. (2019). Toward a metaphysical empirical psychology. Book chapter in Re-envisioning theoretical and philosophical psychology (Ed. Thomas Teo), pp. 209–237. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Unified professional psychology: Implications for combined-integrated doctoral training programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1051–1063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. R., Michalski, J., Quackenbush, S., & Schmidt, W. (in press). The Tree of Knowledge System: A new map for Big History. Journal of Big History.

  • Kankanamge, D. G. J., & Moore, W. B. (2016). Heat transport in the hadean mantle: From heat pipes to plates. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 3208–3214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: The emergence and evolution of life. Oxford University Press.

  • Kirschner, S. (2019). The indispensable subject of psychology: Theory, subjectivity and the spectre of inner life. Book chapter in Re-envisioning theoretical and philosophical psychology (Ed. Thomas Teo), pp. 131–159.

  • Kral, K., & Prete, F. (2004). In the mind of a hunter: The visual world of the praying mantis. In Prete (Ed). Complex Worlds from Simpler Nervous Systems. Chapter MIT Press.

  • Lamiell, J. (2017). The incorrigible science: A conversation with James Lamiell. In: Macdonald H., Goodman D., Becker B. (eds) Dialogues at the Edge of American Psychological Discourse. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levitis, D. A., Lidicker, W. Z., Jr., & Freund, G. (2009). Behavioral biologists do not agree on what constitutes behavior. Animal Behavior, 78, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunine, J. I. (2006). Physical conditions on the early earth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Biological Sciences, 361, 1721–1731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Moore, J. (2011/2012). Methodological behaviorism as a radical behaviorist views it. Behavior and Philosophy, 39/40, 145–202.

  • Myers, D., & DeWall, C. N. (2016). Exploring psychology (10th Ed.). New York: MacMillian Worth publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naour, P. (2009). E. O. Wilson and B. F. Skinner: A dialogue between radical behaviorism and sociobiology. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nataf, P., & Ciuti, C. (2010). No-go theorem for superradient quantum phase transitions in cavity QED and counter-example in circuit QED. Nature Communications, 1, 72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ossorio, P. G. (2006). The behavior of persons. The collected works of Peter G. Ossorio, Vol. V. Ann Arbor: Descriptive Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (1999). Teleological behaviorism. In W. O’Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Handbook of behaviorism (pp. 195–215). San Diego: Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012524190-8/50009-7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, C., & Cronin, L. (2016). Quantifying the origins of life on a planetary scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 8127–8132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1967/1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. London: Cambridge University Press.

  • Shaffer, L. S. (2008). Religion as a large-scale justification system: Does the justification hypothesis explain animistic attribution? Theory & Psychology, 18, 779–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308097257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, T. (2000). The bit and the pendulum: From quantum computing to M theory: The new physics of information. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1987). What ever happened to the science of behavior? American Psychologist, 42(8), 780–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner Foundation (posted 2009). Video showing pigeons playing ping pong. Retrieved January 17, 2019 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGazyH6fQQ4.

  • Spradling, A. C. (2006). Learning the common language of genetics. Genetics, 174, 1–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stahlman, W. D., & Leising, K. (2018). The coelacanth still lives: Bringing selection back to the fore in a science of behavior. American Psychologist, 73(7), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, H. (2015). The neurosciences and the search for a unified psychology: The science and esthetics of a single framework. Frontiers in Psychology, Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01467, 6.

  • Tryon, W. (2016). Transtheoretic transdiagnostic psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 26(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uher, J. (2013). Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story-Why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psycholology and Behavioral Science, 47, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uher, J. (2016). What is behaviour? And (when) is language behaviour? A metatheoretical definition. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 46, 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, E. (2018). What’s next? American Psychological Association monitor. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2018/07-08/cover-next.aspx#wasserman. Accessed 7 Jan 2019.

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: MA: Shambala.

  • Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, R. (2013). Physics and our universe. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyTKyj9kpVk. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.

  • Wray, G. A. (2015). Molecular clocks and the early evolution of metazoan nervous systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Biological Sciences, 370, 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. James Madison University, 216 Johnston Hall, MSC 7401, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA

    Gregg Henriques

  2. Kings University College at Western, London, Ontario, Canada

    Joseph Michalski

Authors
  1. Gregg Henriques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph Michalski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregg Henriques.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henriques, G., Michalski, J. Defining Behavior and its Relationship to the Science of Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 328–353 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09504-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09504-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation