Abstract
The objective of this paper is to analyze how the maternal bond in first-time pregnant women emerges from bodily experiences in the pre-semiotic level and leads to the emergence of the semiotic field. The bond as a sign field is internally structured and enables the regulation of connections with other signs outside the field. As a result of the dialogue between biological and sociocultural imperatives, sociocultural meanings are turned into personal meanings and presented by women through behavior. This study is based on longitudinally-collected interview data consisting of six interviews with women from the time they were pregnant until their child turned one year old. During this period, three ruptures as turning points in the formation of the bond were identified. Based on idiographic analyses, it was concluded that body signals caused by the development of the fetus are coded by women into signs of various kinds, which define the status of mother and create the foundation for the mother-child relationship which continues throughout the lifespan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bastos, A. C. (2017). Shadow trajectories: The poetic motion of motherhood meanings through the lens of lived temporality. Culture & Psychology, 23(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16655458.
Cabell, K. R. (2010). Mediators, regulators, and catalyzers: A context inclusive model of trajectory development. Psychology & Society, 3(1), 26–41.
Cabell, K. R., & Valsiner, J. (2011). Catalysis: Cultural constructions and the conditions for change. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–12.
de Cock, E. S. A., Henrichs, J., Vreeswijk, C. M. J. M., Maas, A. J. B. M., Rijk, C. H. A. M., & van Bakel, H. J. A. (2016). Continuous feelings of love? The parental bond from pregnancy to toddlerhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000138.
De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2014). Catalysis and morphogenesis: The contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The catalyzing mind: Beyond the ,models of causality (pp. 149–163). New York, USA: Springer.
Feldman, R. (2016). The neurobiology of mammalian parenting and the biosocial context of human caregiving. Hormones and Behavior, 77, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.001.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2015). Dialogical self in a complex world: The need for bridging theories. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i1.917.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Jansen, E. (2004). The dialogical construction of coalitions in a personal position repretoire. In H. J. M. Hermans & G. Dimaggio (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 124–137). New York: Brunner & Routledge.
Herrler, A., von Rango, U., & Beier, H. M. (2003). Embryo-maternal signalling: How the embryo starts talking to its mother to accomplish implantation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 6(2), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61717-8.
Holschbach, M. A., & Lonstein, J. S. (2017). Motherhood and infant contact regulate neuroplasticity in the serotonergic midbrain dorsal raphe. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 76, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.10.023.
Huber, J., & Schmidt-Tannwald, I. (2008). A biosemiotics approach to epigenetics: Consturctivist aspects of oocyte-to-embryo transition. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis (pp. 457–471). Dordrecht: Springer.
Josephs, I. E., Valsiner, J., & Surgan, S. E. (1999). The process of meaning construction. In J. Brandtstätder & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Action & self-development (pp. 257–282). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Leckman, J. F., Feldman, R., Swain, J. E., Eichler, V., Thompson, N., & Mayes, L. C. (2004). Primary parental preoccupation: Circuits, genes, and the crucial role of the environment. Journal of Neural Transmission, 11, 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-003-0067x.
Lozoff, B., Jordan, B., & Malone, S. (1988). Childbirth in cross-cultural perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 12(3–4), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v12n0304.
Luz, R., George, A., Vieux, R., & Spitz, E. (2017). Antenatal determinants of parental attachment and parenting alliance: How do mothers and fathers differ? Infant Mental Health Journal, 38(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21628.
Maas, A. J. B. M., Vreeswijk, C. M. J. M., de Cock, E. S. A., Rijk, C. H. A. M., & van Bakel, H. J. A. (2012). “Expectant parents”: Study protocol of a longitudinal study concerning prenatal (risk) factors and postnatal infant development, parenting, and parentinfant relationships. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-46.
Moñivas, J. R. (2018). Is the ambivalence a sign of the multiple-self nature of the human being ? Interdisciplinary Remarks. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9440-z.
Numan, M. (2006). Hypothalamic neural circuits regulating maternal responsiveness toward infants. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5(4), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582306288790.
Poindron, P. (2005). Mechanisms of activation of maternal behavior in mammals. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 45(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005025.
Rosenbaum, J. P., & Valsiner, J. (2011). The un-making of a method: From rating scales to the study of psychological processes. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309352913.
Siddiqui, A., & Hägglöf, B. (2000). Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother-infant interaction? Early Human Development, 59, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3782(00)00076-1.
Stjernfelt, F. (2007). The signifying body. In F. Stjernfelt (Ed.), Diagrammatology. An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics (pp. 257–273). Dordrecht: Springer.
Toomela, A. (2015). Vygotsky's theory on the Procrustes’ bed of linear thinking: Looking for structural–systemic Theseus to save the idea of ‘social formation of mind’. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15570490.
Toomela, A. (2016). What are higher psychological functions? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9328-0.
Valsiner, J. (2001). Process structure of semiotic mediation in human development. Human Development, 44, (pp.84–97). Academic Research Library. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d9a/77920f19222a0ebf0e8bbdf43ed987ab85dc.pdf
Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012002633.
Valsiner, J. (2006). Scaffolding within the structure of dialogical self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.06.001.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2014). Sign hierarchies: Their construction, use, and demiliotion. In J.Valsiner An invitation to cultural psychology (pp.110–134). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Valsiner, J. (2017). Between self and societies: Creating psychology in a new key. Tallinn University Press.
Van den Bergh, B., & Simons, A. (2009). A review of scales to measure the mother-foetus relationship. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830802007480.
World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wu, Z., Autry, A. E., Bergan, J. F., Watabe-Uchida, M., & Dulac, C. G. (2014). Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour. Nature, 509(7500), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13307.
Zittoun, T., & Valsiner, J. (2016). Imagining the past and remembering the future. In T.Sato, N.Mori & J.Valsiner (Eds.), Making of the future: The trajectory equifinality approach in cultural psychology (pp.3–21). Information Age Publishing.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Jaan Valsiner for his thoughtful feedback on an earlier version of this paper which greatly helped to clarify the central argument of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uriko, K. Semiotic Regulation in the Construction of Maternal Bond: From Body Experience to the Semiotic Field. Integr. psych. behav. 52, 672–685 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9453-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9453-7