Abstract
Educational practitioners are often reluctant, if not actively resistant, to their participation in production and consumption of educational research. Based on my research experience with educational practitioners, I try to deconstruct this phenomenon using dialogic Bakhtinian and Aristotelian sociocultural frameworks. I consider two major related breakdowns in the educational practice: 1) a lack of self-correcting process in the educational practice, while reliance on accountability policy to achieve the practice quality, and 2) a breakdown between educational research and educational practice. I argue that the first breakdown is caused by viewing teaching as poiesis, aiming at preset curricular endpoints, and not as praxis, critically defining its own values, goals, and virtues. As to the second breakdown, I argue that current mainstream and even innovative research is defined through the technê and epistêmê ways of knowing, which correspond to a poiesic vision of educational practice. I suggest that educational practice primarily involves the phronêtic and sophic ways of knowing, which correspond to a praxis vision of educational practice. I describe phronêtic research of teaching through a case of my students, preservice teachers, working on revisions of their lessons that they conducted at an urban afterschool program. Finally, I consider recommendations for institutional support for phronêtic research on teaching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Roudedge and Kegan Paul.
Aristotle (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511802058.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Vol. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Witrock (Ed.), The handbook of research on teaching (3 ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
Buchanan, J. M. (1979). Natural and artifactual man. In J. M. Buchanan (Ed.), What should economists do? (pp. 93–112). Indianapolis: Liberty Press.
Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 421–435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00517.x.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
Denham, C., & Lieberman, A. (1980). Time to learn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: ‘Phronesis’ and ‘techne’ in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Dyson, A. H. (1997). Writing superheroes: contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Falk, J. H., Donovan, E., & Woods, R. (2001). Free-choice science education: how we learn science outside of school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Freedom Writers, & Gruwell, E. (1999). The freedom writers diary: how a teacher and 150 teens used writing to change themselves and the world around them (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-HIll Book Co..
Greenberg, D. (1992). The Sudbury Valley school experience. Framingham, MA: Sudbury Valley School Press.
Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future: The Zo-Ped. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development”. New Directions for Child Development (Vol. 23, pp. 45–64). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hammer, D., & Zee, E. v. (2006). Seeing the science in children’s thinking: case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hammersley, M. (1997). Educational research and teaching: a response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 141–161. doi:10.1080/0141192970230203.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. Retrieved from http://www.bera.ac.uk/files/resourcesfiles/educationalresearch/hargreaves_1996.pdf
Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In defense of research for evidence-based teaching: a rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–419. doi:10.1080/0141192970230402.
Holt, J. C. (1972). Freedom and beyond (1st ed.). New York: E. P. Dutton.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Labaree, D. F. (2010). Someone has to fail: the zero-sum game of public schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lobok, A. (2001). The probabilistic world: the chronicles of the philosophical-pedagogical reflections of an educational experiment. Yekaterinoburg, Russia: Association of Small Businesses.
Lobok, A. (2008). The diamond-filled land of Olonkho pedagogy. Yekaterinburg.
MacIntyre, A. C. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral philosophy. London: Duckworth.
Matusov, E. (2001). Intersubjectivity as a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 383–402.
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E. (2011a). Authorial teaching and learning. In E. J. White & M. Peters (Eds.), Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in education across the globe (pp. 21–46). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Matusov, E. (2011b). Imagining ‘No child left behind’ being freed from neoliberal hijackers. Democracy and Education, 19(2), 1–8 Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=home.
Matusov, E., & Brobst, J. (2013). Radical experiment in dialogic pedagogy in higher education and its centaur failure: Chronotopic analysis. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2012). Diverse approaches to education: Alienated learning, closed and open participatory socialization, and critical dialogue. Human Development, 55(3), 159–166. doi:10.1159/000339594.
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2014). Democratic dialogic education for and from authorial agency: An interview with professor Eugene Matusov. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 9–26. doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i1.762.
Matusov, E., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2016). The State’s Educational Neutrality: Radical proposal for educational pluralism (Editorial). Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, E1–E26 Retrieved from http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/170/114. doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.170.
Matusov, E., St. Julien, J., & Hayes, R. (2005). Building a creole educational community as the goal of multicultural education for preservice teachers. In L. V. Barnes (Ed.), Contemporary teaching and teacher issues (pp. 1–38). Hauppauge: Nova Publishers.
Matusov, E., Smith, M. P., Candela, M. A., & Lilu, K. (2007). “Culture has no internal territory”: Culture as dialogue. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 460–483). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611162.025.
Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016a). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420–446. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9334-2.
Matusov, E., Smith, M. P., Soslau, E., Marjanovic-Shane, A., & von Duyke, K. (2016b). Dialogic education from and for authorial agency. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 4, A162–A197. doi:10.5195/dpj.2016.172.
Murray, F. (1970). Credibility of information for educational innovation. The Journal of Educational Research, 64(1), 17–20.
Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: a radical approach to child rearing. New York: Hart Publishing Company.
Orenstein, P. (2011). Cinderella Ate my daughter: dispatches from the front lines of the new girlie-girl culture (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Paley, V. G. (1992). You can’t say you can’t play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prendergast, M., Leggo, C., & Sameshima, P. (2009). Poetic inquiry: vibrant voices in the social sciences. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Reynolds, M. C., & American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (1989). Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
Richardson, S. (2011). Performances of masculinities in elementary schools. PhD Dissertation: University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Rietmulder, J. (2009). The circle school: an introduction to integral education ideas and practices. Harrisburg PA: The Circle School.
Sameshima, P. (2007). Seeing red: a pedagogy of parallax: an epistolary bildungsroman on artful scholarly inquiry. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2002). Learning relations: impure education, deschooled schools, and dialogue with evil. New York: P. Lang.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2009). Labor of learning: Market and the next generation of education reform. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Smith, M. S., Hughes, E. K., Engle, R. A., & Stein, M. K. (2009). Orchestrating discussions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(9), 548–556.
Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiliam, D. (2008). What should education research do, and how should it do it? Educational Researcher, 37(7), 432–438. doi:10.3102/0013189X08325678.
Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., Hyde, A. A., & Varner, W. (1998). Best practice: new standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
I’d like to thank Laura Leach, Bob Hampel, Mark Smith, and Ana Marjanovic-Shane, and anonymous reviewers for providing their feedback on previous drafts and discussion ideas in this paper. I also want to thank Lynn Dierking and John Falk for inviting me to this project and discussing many aspects of it with me.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matusov, E. Examining how and why to Engage Practitioners from across the Learning Landscape in the Research Enterprise: Proposal for Phronêtic Research on Education. Integr. psych. behav. 51, 94–119 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9365-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9365-3