Abstract
Organisms that have been genetically engineered and modified (GM) are referred to as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Bt crops are plants that have been genetically modified to produce certain proteins from the soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which makes these plants resistant to certain lepidopteran and coleopteran species. Genetically Modified (GM) rice was produced in 2006 by Iranian researchers from Tarom Mowla’ii and has since been called ‘Bt rice’. As rice is an important source of food for over 3 billion inhabitants on Earth, this study aims to use a correlational survey in order to shed light on the predicting factors relating to the extent of stakeholders’ behavioral intentions towards Bt rice. It is assumed and the results confirm that “attitudes toward GM crops” can be used as a bridge in the Attitude Model and the Behavioral Intention Model in order to establish an integrated model. To this end, a case study was made of the Southwest part of Iran in order to verify this research model. This study also revealed that as a part of the integrated research framework in the Behavior Intention Model both constructs of attitude and the subjective norm of the respondents serve as the predicting factors of stakeholders’ intentions of working with Bt rice. In addition, the Attitude Model, as the other part of the integrated research framework, showed that the stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice can only be determined by the perceived benefits (e.g. positive outcomes) of Bt rice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Tarom Mowla’ii is an Iranian rice varieties.
The authors are aware of focusing on the “stakeholders” for this study. However given to this fact that most of available published literature on attitude and behavioral intention studies toward GM crops/food has focused on the public and consumers rather than stakeholders, the authors discuss consumers’ perception.
Comparative Fit Index.
Incremental Fit Index.
Tucker-Lewis Index.
Root Mean Square Error of Approximation.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
World Health Organization.
References
Absalan, Sh., Gilany, A. (2005). Change of Khuzestan rice irrigation management is an inevitable necessity. Technical workshop on Mechanized Surface Irrigation. (In Persian).
Aerni, P. (2002). Stakeholder attitudes toward the risks and benefits of agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: a comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1123–1137.
Agricultural Ministry (2012). Agricultural statistical letter of crops, Crop years, 2011–2012. Tehran: Agricultural Ministry, Deputy of planning and economic (In Persian).
Ajzen, I. 2002. Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved 1 September 2011 (http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf).
Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: the theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 70(2), 121–138.
Amin, L., Nor, A. R. M., Jahi, J. M., Osman, M., & Mahadi, N. M. (2005). Factors for a socially acceptable gene technology. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 137–146.
Amin, L., Azad, M. A. K., Gausmian, M. H., & Zulkifli, F. (2014). Determinants of Public Attitudes to Genetically Modified Salmon. PLOS ONE, 9(1), e86174.
Angulo, A. M., & Gil, J. M. (2007a). Spanish Consumers’ Attitudes and Acceptability towards GM Food Products. Agricultural Economics Review, 8(1), 50–63.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471–499.
Azadi, H., & Ho, P. (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: A review of options for food security. Biotechnology Advances, 28(1), 160–168.
Bakshi, S., & Dewan, D. (2013). Status of Transgenic Cereal Crops: A Review. ClonTransgen, 3(119), 2.
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bouman, B. A. M., Barker, R., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T. P., Atlin, G. N., Bennett, J., & Wassman, R. (2007). Rice: feeding the billions.
Bredahl, L. (2001a). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—Results of a cross-national survey. Consumer Policy, 24(1), 23–61.
Bredahl, L., Grunert, K., & Frewer, L. (1988). Consumers attitude and decision making with regard to genetically engineered food products – a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. Working paper No 52.
Bredahl, L., Grunert, G., & Frewer, L. J. (1998). Consumer attitudes and decision making with regard to genetically engineered food products. A review of literature and a presentation of models for future research. Consumer Policy, 21(3), 251–277.
Chen, M. F. (2008). An integrated research framework to understand consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified foods. British food journal, 110(6), 559–579.
Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumer’s attitude toward genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(4), 662–674.
Chern, W. S. (2006). Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Sustainability in Agriculture. In 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12–18, 2006, Queensland, Australia (No. 25463). International Association of Agricultural Economists.
Chong, M. (2005). Perception of the risks and benefits of Bt eggplant by Indian farmers. Journal of Risk Research, 8(7–8), 617–634.
Chopra, P.; Kamma, A. (2005). Genetically Modified Crops in India. Available on: http://paraschopra.com/publications/gm.pdf
Cohen, M. B., Chen, M., Bentur, J. S., Heong, K. L., & Ye, G. (2008). Bt rice in Asia: potential benefits, impact, and sustainability. In Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs (pp. 223–248). Springer Netherlands.
Costa-Font, M., & Gil, J. M. (2009). Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study. Food Quality and Preference, 20(6), 399–409.
Costa-Font, M., Gil, J. M., & Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food policy, 33(2), 99–111.
Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J., & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. AgBioForum, 7(1&2), 70–75.
Dashti, K. (2012). "Agriculture Blooms". Iran Daily, Domestic Economy, Aug 30.
Datta, A. (2013). Genetic engineering for improving quality and productivity of crops. Agriculture & Food Security, 2(1), 15.
Delafrooz, N., Paim, L. H., & Khatibi, A. (2011). A Research Modeling to Understand Online Shopping Intention. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 5(5).
Du Plessis, L., & Petzer, D. J. (2011). The attitudes of donors towards non-profit organizations (NPOs) in Gauteng, South Africa: A generational perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(30), 12144.
FAO (1996) Declaration on world food security. World Food Summit, FAO, Rome.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Frewer, L., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42(7), 1181–1193.
Fritz, S., Husmann, D., Wingenbach, G., Rutherford, T., Egger, V., & Wadhwa, P. (2003). Awareness and acceptance of biotechnology issues among youth, undergraduates, and adults. AgBioForum, 6(4), 178–184.
Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Stares, S., Fjæstad, B., Öhman, S., & Olofsson, A. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002-Eurobarometer 58.0: A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society". Chicago
Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Agricultural Professionals Toward Genetically Modified (GM) Foods: A Case Study in Southwest Iran. Science and engineering ethics, 19(3), 1201–1227.
Giger, E., Prem, R., & Leen, M. (2009). Increase of agricultural production based on genetically modified food to meet population growth demands. School of Doctoral Studies (European Union. Journal, 1, 98–124.
Green Peace International. (2006). Future of Rice, Examining long term, sustainable solutions for Rice production.
Hamstra, A. M. (1991). Biotechnology in foodstuffs: Towards a model of consumer acceptance: SWOKA The Hague,, The Netherlands.
Hamstra, A. M. (1995). Consumer acceptance model for food biotechnology: Final report: SWOKA, Instituut voor strategisch consumentenonderzoek.
Han, J. H. (2006). The effects of perceptions on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods. Chonnam National University: Doctoral dissertation.
Hellmich, R. L., & Hellmich, K. A. (2012). Use and impact of Bt maize. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 4.
Hosseini, J. Ehsani, V. Lashgarara, F. (2012). Exploiting the Application of Genetically Modified Crops by Farmers in Iran. American Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-223X, Issue July (2011), 138–144
Hoyer, W.D., & Macinnis, D.J. (2009). Consumer Behavior. 5th ed. USA: Cengage Learning.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Ibrahim, R. A., & Shawer, D. M. (2014). Transgenic Bt-Plants and the Future of Crop Protection (An Overview). International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (IJAFR), 3(1), 14–40.
Index Mundi (2013) Internet’s most complete country profiles. Available in: http://www.indexmundi.com/
IRRA, International Rice Research Institute. (2013). Available in: http://www.irri.org
Ismail, K., Soehod, K., Vivishna, S., Khurram, W., Jafri, S. K. A., & bin Riamily, M. K. (2012a). Genetically modified food and consumer purchase intentions: a study in Johor Bahru. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(5), 197–207.
Ismail, K., Vivishna, S., Khurram, W., & Jafri, S. K. A. (2012b). Evaluating consumer purchase intentions for genetically modified food in Malaysia: A comparative study of Muslim and non-Muslim consumers. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(5), 466–474.
James, C. (2005). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2005. ISAAA Briefs No. 34. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Kaiser, F. G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1033--1048.
Kaneko, N., & Chern, W. S. (2003). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods: A telephone survey. Consumer Interests Annual, 49, 1–13.
Kaya, I. H., Poyrazoglu, E. S., Artik, N., & Konar, N. (2013). Academicans’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward GM-Organisms and–Foods. International Journal of Biological, Ecological and Environmental Sciences (IJBEES), 2(2), 20–24.
Kim, R. B. (2012a). Consumer Attitude of Risk and Benefits toward Genetically Modified (GM) Foods in South Korea: Implications for Food Policy. Engineering Economics, 23(2), 189–199.
Kim, Y. G. (2014). Ecological Concerns about Genetically Modified (GM) Food Consumption using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 677–681.
Kobbeltvedt, T., & Wolff, K. (2009). The Risk-as-feelings hypothesis in a Theory-of-planned-behaviour perspective. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), 567–586.
Kraft, P., Rise, J., Sutton, S., & Røysamb, E. (2005). Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude? Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 44(3), 479e496.
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 1970(30), 607–610.
Małyska, A., Maciąg, K., & Twardowski, T. (2014). Perception of GMOs by scientists and practitioners–the critical role of information flow about transgenic organisms. New biotechnology, 31(2), 196–202.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853–886.
Mullan, B., & Wong, C. (2010). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to design a food hygiene intervention. Food Control, 21(11), 1524–1529.
National Cartographic Center (NCC) (2015) Available in: www.ncc.org.ir
Nistor, L. (2013). Attitudes towards GM food in Romania. A moral question?.RevistaRomana de Bioetica, 10(2).
Nonis, I., & Missalla, M. (2004). U.S. Patent No. 6,726,125. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Patch, C. S., Tapsell, L. C., & Williams, P. G. (2005). Attitudes and intentions toward purchasing novel foods enriched with omega-3 fatty acids. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 37(5), 235–241.
Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., & Zani, B. (2012). The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: Test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Quality and Preference, 25(2), 163–170.
Qiu, H., & Huang, J. (2006). Consumers’ Trust in government and their attitudes towards genetically modified food: empirical evidence from China. In 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12–18, 2006, Queensland, Australia (No. 25,741). International Association of Agricultural Economists.
Riaz, M. N., & Chaudry, M. M. (2004). The value of Halal food production-Mian N. Riaz and Muhammad M. Chaudry define what Halal and kosher foods are, describe why they are not the same thing, and what is required of processors and. Inform-International News on Fats Oils and Related Materials, 15(11), 698–701.
Sandoe, P. (2001). What is the lesson to be learnt from the controversy about gene technology, Report of the first integrated discussion platform. Ispra: In Meeting of the thematic network Entrance Food.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
Senarath, S. N., & Karunagoda, R. P. (2012). Consumer Attitude towards Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 23(3), 283–288.
Shaffer, P. A., Vogel, D. L., & Wei, M. (2006a). The mediating roles of anticipated risks, anticipated benefits, and attitudes on the decision to seek professional help: An attachment perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 442.
Shi, Y., Ehlers, S., & Warner, D. O. (2014). The Theory of Planned Behavior as Applied to Preoperative Smoking Abstinence. PloS one, 9(7), e103064.
Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of genetechnology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195–204.
Soregaroli, C., Boccaletti, S., & Moro, D. (2003). Consumer’s attitude towards labeled and unlabeled GM food products in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6(2), 112–127.
Sukman, N. A., Suradi, N. R. M., & Amin, L. (2009). Model Development of Students Attitude towards Genetically Modified Food. Sains Malaysiana, 38(2), 241–247.
Trail, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., Moor, M., & Morrow., J. L. (2004). Categories of GM risk benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum, 7(4), 176–186.
USDA (2012) United States Department of Agriculture. Rice trade. Available in: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/rice/trade.aspx#.VEwZWCKUcZw
Vänninen, I., Siipi, H., Keskitalo, M., & Erkkilä, M. (2009). Ethical compatibility of GM crops with intrinsic and extrinsic values of farmers: A review. Open Ethics Journal, 3, 104–117.
Verdurme, A., & Viaene, F. (2003). Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food. Qualitative Market Research, 6(2), 95–11.
Wang, E. H., Yu, Z., Hu, J., Jia, X. D., &Xu, H. B. (2013). A two-generation reproduction study with transgenic Bt rice TT51 in Wistar rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.045.
Weirich, P. (2007). Labeling genetically modified food: The philosophical and legal debate. Oxford University Press.
Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 97–120.
Yawson, R. M., Quaye, W., Entsi Williams, I., & Yawson, I. (2008). A Stakeholder Approach to Investigating Public Perception and Attitudes towards Agricultural Biotechnology in Ghana. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 4(1–2), 55–70.
Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M. (2015). Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Miranda Kitterlin from the Chaplin School of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Florida International University for her comments. Also the authors wish to thank Ms. Bethany Gardner from the Department of Linguistics, the State University of New York at Binghamton, for her kind help in improving the English of this text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghoochani, O.M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M. et al. Multi Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and Multi Attribute Models. Integr. psych. behav. 51, 141–163 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9358-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9358-2