Multi Stakeholders’ Attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and Multi Attribute Models
- 201 Downloads
Organisms that have been genetically engineered and modified (GM) are referred to as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Bt crops are plants that have been genetically modified to produce certain proteins from the soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which makes these plants resistant to certain lepidopteran and coleopteran species. Genetically Modified (GM) rice was produced in 2006 by Iranian researchers from Tarom Mowla’ii and has since been called ‘Bt rice’. As rice is an important source of food for over 3 billion inhabitants on Earth, this study aims to use a correlational survey in order to shed light on the predicting factors relating to the extent of stakeholders’ behavioral intentions towards Bt rice. It is assumed and the results confirm that “attitudes toward GM crops” can be used as a bridge in the Attitude Model and the Behavioral Intention Model in order to establish an integrated model. To this end, a case study was made of the Southwest part of Iran in order to verify this research model. This study also revealed that as a part of the integrated research framework in the Behavior Intention Model both constructs of attitude and the subjective norm of the respondents serve as the predicting factors of stakeholders’ intentions of working with Bt rice. In addition, the Attitude Model, as the other part of the integrated research framework, showed that the stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice can only be determined by the perceived benefits (e.g. positive outcomes) of Bt rice.
KeywordsTPB model Multi attribute model Multi-stakeholders Bt rice Path analysis
The authors would like to thank Dr. Miranda Kitterlin from the Chaplin School of Hospitality and Tourism Management at Florida International University for her comments. Also the authors wish to thank Ms. Bethany Gardner from the Department of Linguistics, the State University of New York at Binghamton, for her kind help in improving the English of this text.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was funded by Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Absalan, Sh., Gilany, A. (2005). Change of Khuzestan rice irrigation management is an inevitable necessity. Technical workshop on Mechanized Surface Irrigation. (In Persian).Google Scholar
- Agricultural Ministry (2012). Agricultural statistical letter of crops, Crop years, 2011–2012. Tehran: Agricultural Ministry, Deputy of planning and economic (In Persian).Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. 2002. Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved 1 September 2011 (http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf).
- Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: the theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 70(2), 121–138.Google Scholar
- Amin, L., Nor, A. R. M., Jahi, J. M., Osman, M., & Mahadi, N. M. (2005). Factors for a socially acceptable gene technology. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 6, 137–146.Google Scholar
- Angulo, A. M., & Gil, J. M. (2007a). Spanish Consumers’ Attitudes and Acceptability towards GM Food Products. Agricultural Economics Review, 8(1), 50–63.Google Scholar
- Bakshi, S., & Dewan, D. (2013). Status of Transgenic Cereal Crops: A Review. ClonTransgen, 3(119), 2.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development, Six theories of child development (Vol. 6, pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Bouman, B. A. M., Barker, R., Humphreys, E., Tuong, T. P., Atlin, G. N., Bennett, J., & Wassman, R. (2007). Rice: feeding the billions.Google Scholar
- Bredahl, L., Grunert, K., & Frewer, L. (1988). Consumers attitude and decision making with regard to genetically engineered food products – a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research. Working paper No 52.Google Scholar
- Chern, W. S. (2006). Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Sustainability in Agriculture. In 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12–18, 2006, Queensland, Australia (No. 25463). International Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
- Chopra, P.; Kamma, A. (2005). Genetically Modified Crops in India. Available on: http://paraschopra.com/publications/gm.pdf
- Cohen, M. B., Chen, M., Bentur, J. S., Heong, K. L., & Ye, G. (2008). Bt rice in Asia: potential benefits, impact, and sustainability. In Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs (pp. 223–248). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Curtis, K. R., McCluskey, J. J., & Wahl, T. I. (2004). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. AgBioForum, 7(1&2), 70–75.Google Scholar
- Dashti, K. (2012). "Agriculture Blooms". Iran Daily, Domestic Economy, Aug 30.Google Scholar
- Delafrooz, N., Paim, L. H., & Khatibi, A. (2011). A Research Modeling to Understand Online Shopping Intention. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 5(5).Google Scholar
- Du Plessis, L., & Petzer, D. J. (2011). The attitudes of donors towards non-profit organizations (NPOs) in Gauteng, South Africa: A generational perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(30), 12144.Google Scholar
- FAO (1996) Declaration on world food security. World Food Summit, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fritz, S., Husmann, D., Wingenbach, G., Rutherford, T., Egger, V., & Wadhwa, P. (2003). Awareness and acceptance of biotechnology issues among youth, undergraduates, and adults. AgBioForum, 6(4), 178–184.Google Scholar
- Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Stares, S., Fjæstad, B., Öhman, S., & Olofsson, A. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002-Eurobarometer 58.0: A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project "Life Sciences in European Society". ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Giger, E., Prem, R., & Leen, M. (2009). Increase of agricultural production based on genetically modified food to meet population growth demands. School of Doctoral Studies (European Union. Journal, 1, 98–124.Google Scholar
- Green Peace International. (2006). Future of Rice, Examining long term, sustainable solutions for Rice production.Google Scholar
- Hamstra, A. M. (1991). Biotechnology in foodstuffs: Towards a model of consumer acceptance: SWOKA The Hague,, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Hamstra, A. M. (1995). Consumer acceptance model for food biotechnology: Final report: SWOKA, Instituut voor strategisch consumentenonderzoek.Google Scholar
- Han, J. H. (2006). The effects of perceptions on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods. Chonnam National University: Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
- Hellmich, R. L., & Hellmich, K. A. (2012). Use and impact of Bt maize. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 4.Google Scholar
- Hosseini, J. Ehsani, V. Lashgarara, F. (2012). Exploiting the Application of Genetically Modified Crops by Farmers in Iran. American Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-223X, Issue July (2011), 138–144Google Scholar
- Hoyer, W.D., & Macinnis, D.J. (2009). Consumer Behavior. 5th ed. USA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Ibrahim, R. A., & Shawer, D. M. (2014). Transgenic Bt-Plants and the Future of Crop Protection (An Overview). International Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (IJAFR), 3(1), 14–40.Google Scholar
- Index Mundi (2013) Internet’s most complete country profiles. Available in: http://www.indexmundi.com/
- IRRA, International Rice Research Institute. (2013). Available in: http://www.irri.org
- Ismail, K., Soehod, K., Vivishna, S., Khurram, W., Jafri, S. K. A., & bin Riamily, M. K. (2012a). Genetically modified food and consumer purchase intentions: a study in Johor Bahru. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(5), 197–207.Google Scholar
- Ismail, K., Vivishna, S., Khurram, W., & Jafri, S. K. A. (2012b). Evaluating consumer purchase intentions for genetically modified food in Malaysia: A comparative study of Muslim and non-Muslim consumers. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(5), 466–474.Google Scholar
- James, C. (2005). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2005. ISAAA Briefs No. 34. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Kaiser, F. G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1033--1048.Google Scholar
- Kaneko, N., & Chern, W. S. (2003). Consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods: A telephone survey. Consumer Interests Annual, 49, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Kaya, I. H., Poyrazoglu, E. S., Artik, N., & Konar, N. (2013). Academicans’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward GM-Organisms and–Foods. International Journal of Biological, Ecological and Environmental Sciences (IJBEES), 2(2), 20–24.Google Scholar
- Kobbeltvedt, T., & Wolff, K. (2009). The Risk-as-feelings hypothesis in a Theory-of-planned-behaviour perspective. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), 567–586.Google Scholar
- Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 1970(30), 607–610.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
- National Cartographic Center (NCC) (2015) Available in: www.ncc.org.ir
- Nistor, L. (2013). Attitudes towards GM food in Romania. A moral question?.RevistaRomana de Bioetica, 10(2).Google Scholar
- Nonis, I., & Missalla, M. (2004). U.S. Patent No. 6,726,125. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark OfficeGoogle Scholar
- Qiu, H., & Huang, J. (2006). Consumers’ Trust in government and their attitudes towards genetically modified food: empirical evidence from China. In 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12–18, 2006, Queensland, Australia (No. 25,741). International Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
- Riaz, M. N., & Chaudry, M. M. (2004). The value of Halal food production-Mian N. Riaz and Muhammad M. Chaudry define what Halal and kosher foods are, describe why they are not the same thing, and what is required of processors and. Inform-International News on Fats Oils and Related Materials, 15(11), 698–701.Google Scholar
- Sandoe, P. (2001). What is the lesson to be learnt from the controversy about gene technology, Report of the first integrated discussion platform. Ispra: In Meeting of the thematic network Entrance Food.Google Scholar
- Soregaroli, C., Boccaletti, S., & Moro, D. (2003). Consumer’s attitude towards labeled and unlabeled GM food products in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 6(2), 112–127.Google Scholar
- Sukman, N. A., Suradi, N. R. M., & Amin, L. (2009). Model Development of Students Attitude towards Genetically Modified Food. Sains Malaysiana, 38(2), 241–247.Google Scholar
- Trail, W. B., Jaeger, S. R., Yee, W. M. S., Valli, C., House, L. O., Lusk, J. L., Moor, M., & Morrow., J. L. (2004). Categories of GM risk benefit perceptions and their antecedents. AgBioForum, 7(4), 176–186.Google Scholar
- USDA (2012) United States Department of Agriculture. Rice trade. Available in: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/rice/trade.aspx#.VEwZWCKUcZw
- Wang, E. H., Yu, Z., Hu, J., Jia, X. D., &Xu, H. B. (2013). A two-generation reproduction study with transgenic Bt rice TT51 in Wistar rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.045.
- Weirich, P. (2007). Labeling genetically modified food: The philosophical and legal debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yawson, R. M., Quaye, W., Entsi Williams, I., & Yawson, I. (2008). A Stakeholder Approach to Investigating Public Perception and Attitudes towards Agricultural Biotechnology in Ghana. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 4(1–2), 55–70.Google Scholar
- Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M. (2015). Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict Iranian students’ intention to purchase organic food, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.071.