Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Types of Rural Extensionists’ Expectations of Psychology and Their Implications on Psychologists’ Practice

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychology has great potential for contributing to rural development, particularly through supporting rural extension (RE). In this paper, the types of expectations extensionists have of psychology are identified, as well as possible ways of integrating psychosocial knowledge into the RE context. Rural extensionists from 12 Latin American countries were surveyed (n = 654). Of them, 89.4 % considered psychology could contribute to rural extension and commented on how this would be possible. Expectations were categorised and the nine mentioned by more than 20 % of them were utilized to conduct a two-steps cluster analysis. Three types of extensionists’ expectations were identified: one wherein working with extensionists was highlighted; another characterised by a focus on working with farmers; and a third featuring a traditional, diffusionist extension approach, which views farmers as objects of psychologists’ interventions. With the first type, psychologists should not neglect working with farmers and with the second, with extensionists. With the third type, reflecting on the expectations themselves and their underlying assumptions seems essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acunzo, M., Pafumi, M., Torres, C., & Tirol, M. (2014). Communication for rural development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Oganization of the United Nations (FAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, S. (2001). Pobreza autogestionada. Encrucijadas, 14(2), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf.

  • Anyaegbunam, C., Mefalopulos, P., & Moetsabi, T. (2004). Participatory rural communication appraisal. Starting with the people, a handbook. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belder, P., Rohrbach, D., Twomlow, S., & Senzanje, A. (2007). Can drip irrigation improve the livelihoods of smallholders? Lessons learned from Zimbabwe. Bulawayo: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, R., & Taillieu, T. (2004). Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazorla, A., De los Ríos, I., & Salvo, M. (2013). Working with people (WWP) in rural development projects: a proposal from social learning. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10(70), 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development. Putting the last first. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choocharoen, C., Neef, A., Preechapanya, P., & Hoffmann, V. (2014). Agrosilvopastoral systems in Northern Thailand and Northern Laos: minority peoples’ knowledge versus government policy. Land, 3(2), 414–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A., Hambly Odame, H., & Leeuwis, C. (2014). Transforming the roles of a public extension agency to strengthen innovation: Lessons from the National Agricultural Extension Project in Bangladesh. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 20(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoplos, I. (2010). Movilizing the potencial of rural and agricultural extension. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, M. (2003). Entre el ideario y la realidad: capital social y desarrollo agrícola, algunos apuntes para la reflexión. In R. Atria, M. Siles, I. Arriagada, L. Robison, & S. Whiteford (Eds.), Capital social y reducción de la pobreza en América Latina y el Caribe: en busca de un nuevo paradigma (pp. 397–446). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). ¿Extensión o comunicación? La concientización en el medio rural. Siglo XXI: Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzoli, P. (2012). Comunidades de prática enquanto viabilizadoras de projetos comuns em ambientes turbulentos: uma abordagem crítica. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16(6), 806–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (2012). Marco estratégico a largo plazo (2011–2016). Lindau. Retrieved from http://www.g-fras.org/en/knowledge/documents/category/16-strategic-and-management-documents.html?download=128:gfras-marco-estrategico.

  • Hutchison, A., Johnston, L., & Breckon, J. (2011). Grounded theory-based research within exercise psychology: a critical review. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(3), 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., MacDonald, R., & Andersen, D. (2013). Simulation and managerial decision making: a double-loop learning framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103, 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F. (2011) Racionalidad económica campesina. Mundo Agrario, 12(23). Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/magr/v12n23/v12n23a14.pdf.

  • Landini, F. (Ed.). (2015a). Hacia una psicología rural latinoamericana. Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO): Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F. (2015b). Different Argentine rural extensionists’ mindsets and their practical implications. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(3), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F. (2015c). Contributions of community psychology to rural advisory services: an analysis of Latin American rural extensionists’ point of view. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(3), 359–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F. (2016). Concepción de extensión rural en 10 países latinoamericanos. Andamios, 24(47), 47–68.

  • Landini, F., & Bianqui, V. (2013). Reflecting on practice. Farming Matters, 29(3), 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., & Bianqui, V. (2014). Socio-demographic profile of different samples of Latin American rural extensionists. Ciencia Rural, 44(3), 575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F. & Riet, L. (2015). Extensión rural en Uruguay: problemas y enfoques vistos por sus extensionistas. Mundo Agrario, 16(32). Retrieved from http://www.mundoagrario.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/MAv16n32a09/6862.

  • Landini, F., Murtagh, M., & Lacanna, M. (2009). Aportes y reflexiones desde la psicología al trabajo de extensión con pequeños productores. Formosa: National Institute for Agrarian Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Benítez, M., & Murtagh, S. (2010). Revisión de los trabajos realizados por la psicología sobre pequeños productores agropecuarios. Anuario de Investigaciones, 17(1), 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Bianqui, V., & Crespi, M. (2013a). Evaluación de las creencias sobre extensión rural de los extensionistas paraguayos. Psiencia, 5(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Bianqui, V., & Russo, M. (2013b). Evaluación de un proceso de capacitación para extensionistas rurales implementado en Paraguay. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 51(sup1), s009–s030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Leeuwis, C., Long, N., & Murtagh, S. (2014a). Towards a psychology of rural development processes and interventions. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 534–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landini, F., Long, N., Leeuwis, C., & Murtagh, S. (2014b). Theoretical guidelines for a psychology of rural development processes and interventions. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 11(74), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C. (2004). Communication for rural innovation. Rethinking agricultural extension. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., & Pyburn, R. (Eds.). (2002). Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Social learning in rural resource management. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, J., & Dimensteinm, M. (Eds.). (2013). Psicologia e contextos rurais. Natal: Federal Univesity of Rio Grande do Norte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, J., Silva, L., Oliveira, R., & Stipp, M. (2012). Thoughts regarding researchers utilizing grounded theory. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 46(3), 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (2001). Development sociology. Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchesan, E., & Senseman, S. (2010). Brazilian university technology transfer to rural areas. Ciência Rural, 40(10), 2243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero, M., & Winkler, M. (2014). Iberian and Latin American ethics in community psychology: the contradiction between facts and academician’s perception. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(8), 997–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschitz, H., Roep, D., Brunori, G., & Tisenkopfs, T. (2015). Learning and innovation networks for sustainable agriculture: processes of co-evolution, joint reflection and facilitation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, S., & Landini, F. (2011). Producción científica de la psicología vinculada a pequeños productores agropecuarios con énfasis en el ámbito del desarrollo rural. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, R. (2009). Evolución de los servicios de extensión en Nicaragua. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, R., Mejía, F., Ceville, X., Preissing, J., Boerger, V., Solórzano, N., Meyrat, M., Marín, X., & Morrás, E. (2011a). Buenas prácticas en el manejo de extensión en América Central. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, R., Rivera, O., Cifuentes, I., & Morrás, E. (2011b). Estudio de sistematización de buenas prácticas de extensión en Guatemala. Guatemala: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, M., & Clavijo, N. (2012). Experiencias y enfoques de procesos participativos de innovación en agricultura. El caso de la corporación PBA en Colombia. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preissing, J., Ardila, S., Buitrón, J., & Fernández, C. (2014). Nuevas inversiones en extensión para la agricultura familiar. In S. Salcedo & L. Guzmán (Eds.), Agricultura familiar en América Latina y el Caribe: recomendaciones de política (pp. 215–232). Santiago, Chile: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qamar, K. (2011). Introducing demand-driven extension approach in a traditional region: a case study from Pakistan. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, W., & Alex, G. (Eds.). (2004). Demand- driven approaches to agriculture extension. Case studies of international initiatives. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Nueva York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther, B. (2010). Agricultural extension services and rural innovation in inner Scandinavia. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 64(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Quintanar, C. (Ed.). (2009). Psicología en ambiente rural. Mexico: Plaza y Valdés.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, N. (2006). Extensión rural: ¿hacia dónde vamos? ¿hacia dónde ir? El Colorado: National Institute for Agrarian Technology.

  • Sulaiman, R., & Davis, K. (2012). The “New Extensionist”: roles, strategies, and capacities to strengthen extension and advisory services. Lindau: Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, J. (2010). The learning-paradigm campus: from single- to double-loop learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 123(3), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigo, E., Mateo, N., & Falconi, C. (2013). Agricultural innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Institutional scenarios and mechanisms. Inter-American Development Bank.

  • Zuin, L., Zuin, P., & Manrique, M. (2011). The dialogic communication as a determinant for the teaching-learning processes that occur in rural training: a case study in a public extension located in São Paulo, Brazil. Ciência Rural, 41(5), 917–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Council of Technological and Scientific Research (CONICET), University of La Cuenca del Plata / University of Morón, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina

    Fernando Landini

Authors
  1. Fernando Landini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Landini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Landini, F. Types of Rural Extensionists’ Expectations of Psychology and Their Implications on Psychologists’ Practice. Integr. psych. behav. 50, 684–703 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9341-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9341-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation