Skip to main content
Log in

New Directions in Qualitative Research in Psychology

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2015

Abstract

Qualitative Research gains increasing popularity in the field of Psychology. With the renewed interest, there are, however, also some risks related to the overhomogenization and increasing standardization of qualitative methods. This special issue is dedicated to clarify some of the existing misconceptions of qualitative research and to discuss its potentials for the field of psychology in light of recent endeavors to overcome paradigmatic battles and a re-orientation to the specifities of psychology. The issue comprises a discussion from workshop on the future of qualitative research in psychology organized at Aalborg University, and several contributions that resulted from it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. e.g., MsC in Discursive Psychology at Loughborough University, UK, see also http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/socialsciences/postgraduate-taught/programmes/discursivepsychologymsc/

References

  • Bamberg, M. (2012). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: vol 2. Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 85–102). Washington: American Psychological Association Press.

  • Bhati, K. S., Hoyt, W. T., & Huffman, K. L. (2015). Integration or assimilation? Locating qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2015). Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49(2). doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z

  • Brinkmann, S., & Tanggaard, L. (2015). Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog. 2.ed. København: Hans Reitzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., Yardley, L., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology. Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washingtion, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational Analysis. Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. J., Willis, M. E. H., Barnes, J. S., Caddick, N., Cromby, J., McDermott, H., & Wiltshire, G. (2015). Analytical pluralism in qualitative research: a meta-study. Qualitative Research in Psychology. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.948980. Accepted author version posted online: 19 Aug 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., & Rindskopf, D. (Eds.). (2012). APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A., Alexander, V.D., Fielding, J., Moran-Ellis, J., Thomas, H. (2008). The Analytic Integration of Qualitative Data Sources. In: P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods. London (pp. 572–584).

  • Demuth, C. (2015). “Slow Food” Post-Qualitative Research in Psychology: Old Craft Skills in New Disguise? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49.

  • Demuth, C., & Mey, G. (2015). Qualitative methodology in developmental psychology. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Elsevier Editora LTDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, C., & Fatigante, M. (2012). Comparative qualitative research in cultural psychology: challenges and potentials. Zeitschrift fuer Qualitative Forschung, 13(1–2), 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, C., & Terkildsen, T. (2015). The future of qualitative research in psychology—a discussion with Svend brinkmann, Günter Mey, Luca Tateo, and Anete strand. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49, 2015. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9297-3.

  • Deppermann, A. (2000). Ethnographische Gesprächsanalyse: Zu Nutzen und Notwendigkeit von Ethnographie für die Konversationsanalyse. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion. 1, S. 96-124. (http://www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/heft2000/ga-deppermann.pdf).

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Flick, U. (2008). Managing Quality in Qualitative Research - Book 8 of the SAGE Qualitative Research Kit. In: U. Flick (ed.). London, Thousand Oaks, Dehli: Sage

  • Flick, U. (2011). Mixing Methods, Triangulation and Integrated Research—Challenges for Qualitative Research in a World of Crisis. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry and Global Crisis (pp. 132–152). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, M. A. (Ed.). (2010). Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology. London: A Practical Guide. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2014). From mirroring to world-making: research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12075. Article first published online: 14 Nov 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., Freeman, M., & Anderson, N. B. (2015). The Promises of Qualitative Inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. (2001). Feminist reconstructions of psychology: Narrative, gender & performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado-Parrado, C., & López-López, W. (2015). Single-case research methods: history and suitability for a psychological science in need of alternative. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9290-2. Article first published online: January 13, 2015.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, E., & Coyle, A. (2008). Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbuch qualitative forschung in der psychologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, P.S., & Mey (2015). Grounded Theory Methodology - Narrativity revisited. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49.

  • Shotter, J. (2008). Conversational Realities Revisited: Life, Language, Body and World. Taos Institute Publications.

  • Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2008). Qualitive psychology. A pratical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C., Gibson, S., & Riley, C. E. (2012). Doing your Qualitative Psychology Project. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2015). Gulliver’s Eggs: Why Methods are not an Issue of Qualitative Research in Cultural Psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49, 2015. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9296-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkildsen, T.,& Petersen, S. (2015) The Future of Qualitative Methods—A Students’ Perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49.

  • Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray. Advances in cultural psychology: Constructing human development. USA: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014a). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014b). Needed for cultural psychology: methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2015). Loosing Faith and Gaining Face: How person-centered focus vanished from psychology. Journal for Person-Oriented Research: The Person-Oriented Approach: Roots and Roads to the Future, 1(1).

  • Wertz, F. J. (2011). The qualitative revolution in psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(2), 77–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, F. J. (2014). Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology, 1(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (3rd ed.). MAidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C., & Rogers, W.S. (2008). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Demuth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demuth, C. New Directions in Qualitative Research in Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 125–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9303-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9303-9

Keywords

Navigation