Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Future of Qualitative Research in Psychology - A Discussion with Svend Brinkmann, Günter Mey, Luca Tateo, and Anete Strand

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In May 2014, a workshop on “The future of qualitative research in psychology” took place at Aalborg University (Denmark), Department of Communication & Psychology organized by Carolin Demuth. Participants from Aalborg University engaged in a lively exchange with the two invited discussants Svend Brinkmann (Aalborg University) and Günter Mey (Stendal University of Applied Science). The discussion started out by addressing the specifics of qualitative research in the field of psychology, its historical development and the perils of recent trends of standardization and neo-positivistic orientations. In light of the discrepancy of what could be potentially achieved with qualitative methods for psychological research and how they are actually currently applied, an emphasis was made that we need to return to an understanding of qualitative methods as a craft skill and to take into account the subjectivity of the researcher in the process of scientific knowledge production. Finally, a re-focus on experience as the genuine object of psychological research, as well as a transdisciplinary approach to our understanding of human psychological functioning within a socially co-constructed, biological, as well as material world was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Dahrendorf, R., Pilot, H., Albert, H., Habermas, J., & Popper, K. (1976). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Luchterhand. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, M. (2012). In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 77–94). Washington: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2015). Perils and potentials in qualitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2). DOI 10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z.

  • Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti, L., Witzel, A. & Bishop, L. (2005). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/13.

  • Demuth, C. (2015a in press). New directions in qualitative research in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2).

  • Demuth, C. (2015b in press). “Slow food” post-qualitative research in psychology: Old craft skills in new disguise? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2).

  • Ellis, C., Adams, T.E. & Bochner, A.P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.

  • Flick, U., von Kardorff, E. & Steinke, I. (Eds.) (2014), A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage

  • Hitzler, R. (2007). Wohin des Wegs? Ein Kommentar zu neueren Entwicklungen in der deutschsprachigen “qualitativen” Sozialforschung [31 Absätze]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), Art. 4, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs070344.

  • Jones, K., Gergen, M., Guiney Yallop, J. J., Lopez de Vallejo, I., Roberts, B. & Wright, P. (Hrsg.). (2008). Performative social science. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/10.

  • Knoblauch, H. (2014). Qualitative methods at the crossroads: recent developments in interpretive social research [31 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(3), Art. 12, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1303128.

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopásek, Z. (2008). Making thinking visible with Atlas.ti: Computer assisted qualitative analysis as textual practices [62 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 12, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802124.

  • Mey, G. (2000). Qualitative Research and the Analysis of Processes. Considerations towards a “qualitative developmental psychology”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 10, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001107.

  • Mey, G. (2010). Qualitative developmental psychology. In T. Aaro & V. Jaan (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. S.209–230). Charlotte: NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, G. & Mruck, K. (2007). Qualitative research in Germany: A short cartography. International Sociology, 22(2) [Issue: International Sociology Review of Books], 138-154.

  • Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative Forschung. Analysen und Diskussionen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mruck, K., & Mey, G. (2010). Grounded Theory and reflexivity. In B. Anthony & C. Kathy (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Paperback Version (pp. 487–510). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, P.S. & Mey, G. (2015 in press). Grounded-Theory-Methododology – Narrativity revisited. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2)

  • Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (Eds.) (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. (Critical Theory and Practice in Psychology and the Human Sciences).

  • Shotter, J. (2013). Reflections on sociomateriality and dialogicality in organization studies: from ‘inter-’ to ‘intra-thinking’ … in performing practices. In: Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas: How matter matters: objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.003.0003.

  • Soeffner, H.-G. (2014). Interpretative Sozialwissenschaft. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Qualitative Forschung. Analysen und Diskussionen (pp. 33–51). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2013). Generalization as creative and reflective act: revisiting Lewin’s conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 23(4), 518–536. doi:10.1177/0959354313488844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2015 in press). Gulliver’s eggs: why methods are not an issue in qualitative research. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2).

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkildsen, T. & Petersen, S. (2015 in press). The future of qualitative research in psychology - a students’ perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Vol. 49 (2).

  • Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: BiographicnNarrative and semi-structured Method. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, A., & Reiter, H. (2012). The Problem-Centred Interview. Principles and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Kroghstræde 3, Aalborg, Øst, 9220, Denmark

    Carolin Demuth & Thomas Terkildsen

Authors
  1. Carolin Demuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Terkildsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Demuth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demuth, C., Terkildsen, T. The Future of Qualitative Research in Psychology - A Discussion with Svend Brinkmann, Günter Mey, Luca Tateo, and Anete Strand. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 135–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9297-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9297-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation