Skip to main content

Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology

Abstract

Famously, Ebbinghaus declared that psychology has a long past, but only a short history. Psychology, as something implicit to human conduct, is as old as the human race, but the science, as an explicit investigative reflection upon that conduct, is a recent invention. Within the short history of psychology, we find an even shorter history of qualitative psychology specifically. Although most founding fathers (Freud, Piaget, Bartlett etc.) worked as “qualitative psychologists”, they found no need to thematize their methods of inquiry in this manner. Since around 1980, however, a field has established itself that can be called qualitative psychology. In this paper, I discuss how this field can move sensibly into the future, and I highlight two perils and two potentials. The perils stem from neo-positivism and a threatening “McDonaldization” of qualitative research, while the potentials are related to proliferation of new forms of inquiry and a transcending of disciplinary boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. The members of the research group include Anders Petersen, Mette Rønberg, Mikka Nielsen, and Ester Holte Kofod in addition to myself. The members’ backgrounds are in psychology, sociology, and social anthropology.

References

  • Andrieu, B. (2006). Brains in the flesh: prospects for a neurophenomenology. Janus Head, 9, 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1996). From pilgrim to tourist – or a short history of identity. In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2012a). Qualitative research between craftsmanship and McDonaldization. A keynote address from the 17th qualitative health research conference. Qualitative Studies, 3, 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2012b). Qualitative inquiry in everyday life: Working with everyday life materials. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 17–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, P., Rhodes, J., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics: An introduction the philosophy of science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J. (2006). Qualitative Inquiry, ethics and the politics of evidence: Working within these spaces rather than being worked over by them. Retrieved from: http://www.psy.au.dk/fileadmin/site_files/filer_psykologi/dokumenter/CKM/NB40/julianne_cheek.pdf

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1975). In G. Lenzzer (Ed.), Auguste Comte and positivism: The essential writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P. A. (1989). In pursuit of a scientific culture: science, art, and society in the Victorian age. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (2004). Staking our claim for qualitative psychology as science. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Chicago: Scranton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2008). Qualitative inquiry between scientistic evidentialism, ethical subjectivism and the free market. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M., & Nguyen, V.-K. (2010). An anthropology of biomedicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: positivism, naïve realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. (This edition 2000). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (2006). The politics of evidence. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge (pp. 79–92). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, C., Vir, J., & Barker, A. (2005). Ritzer’s McDonaldization and applied qualitative marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 8, 296–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. (2010). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2008). The McDonaldization of society (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Abi-Rached, J. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 611–625). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, F. (2014). Qualitative inquiry in the history of psychology. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svend Brinkmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brinkmann, S. Perils and Potentials in Qualitative Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 162–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9293-z

Keywords