Abstract
This article uses sociocultural theories of self-reflection to theorize how social representations are transformed. While there are several ways in which social representations change, we focus on one way that entails interactions with alterity, that is, other people, groups and representations. We use sociocultural psychology to explore how social representations can shift from being the medium of thought and action to becoming the object of thought and action. This process, we argue, entails alternative representations becoming the new medium of thought and action. Although this account relies upon the psychological process of self-reflection, it avoids psychological reductionism, because the psychological process is based on social and sociological processes. Self-reflection, however, is more of an exception than a rule, and the ways in which self-reflection is blocked are also examined. Future research, it is argued, should examine the ways in which self-reflection arises through the interaction of representations within situated contexts, thus forging a third way between psychological and sociological reductionism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreouli, E., Skovdal, M., & Campbell, C. (2013). “It made me realise that I am lucky for what I got”: British young carers encountering the realities of their African peers. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(8), 1038–1053.
Arthi. (2012). Representing Mental Illness: A case of Cognitive Polyphasias. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 5.1–5.26.
Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The Language of “Race” and Prejudice. A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-Practical Politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.
Aveling, E.-M., & Gillespie, A. (2008). Negotiating multiplicity: Adaptive asymmetries within second-generation Turks’ “society of mind”. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 21, 1–23.
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 29, 163–186.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric, and attitudes. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Coudin, G. (2013). The Breakdown of the Hegemonic Representation of Madness in Africa. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43, 23–44.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(July), 357–370.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford: Pergamon
Duveen, G. (2002/2013). Construction, Belief, Doubt . In S. Moscovici, S. Jovchelovitch and B. Wagoner (Eds.). Development as a Social Process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen (pp. 112–123). London: Routlege.
Duveen, G. (2007). Culture and Social Representations. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 543–559). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duveen, G., & De Rosa, A. (1992). Social representations and the genesis of social knowledge. Ongoing Production on Social Representations, 1, 94–108.
Duveen, G., & Lloyd, B. (1990). Social Representations as a Genetic Theory. In S. Moscovici, S. Jovchelovitch, & B. Wagoner (Eds.), Development as a social process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen (pp. 173–181). London: Routlege.
Farr, R. M. (1999). The curved nature of the Earth’s surface: The Apollo 11 mission to land a man on the moon. Paper presented at the Department of Social. London School of Economics: Psychology.
Gillespie, A. (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Gillespie, A. (2007). The social basis of self-reflection. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 678–691). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 376–391.
Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position Exchange Theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using resources: Conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture and Psychology, 16, 37–62.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture and Psychology, 19, 518–532.
Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on “social representations”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 195–209.
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routlege.
Jovchelovitch, S., & Gervais, M.C. (1999). Social representations of health and illness: the case of the Chinese community in England. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Kadianaki, I. (2014). The transformative effects of stigma: coping strategies as meaning-making efforts for immigrants living in Greece. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 125–138.
Kadianaki, I., Gillespie, A., & O’Sullivan-Lago (2014). Identity transformations in intercultural encounters: A dialogical analysis. In F. Dervin & K. Risager (Eds.), Identity and Interculturality: Reflexivity in Research Methodology. London: Routlege.
Klitzman, R. (2007). When doctors become patients. Oxford University Press
Leman, P. J., & Duveen, G. (1999). Representations of authority and children’s moral reasoning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 557–575.
Marková, I. (1987). On the integration of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 279–299.
Marková, I. (1996). Towards an Epistemology of Social Representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 26, 177–196.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations: the Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKinlay, A., & Potter, J. (1987). Social representations: A conceptual critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17(4), 471–487.
Mead, G. H. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy, 19(6), 157–163.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Edited by C.W. Morris). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moscovici, S. (1961/2008). Psychoanalysis. Its image and its public. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Moscovici, S. (1972). Theory and society in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), Context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17–68). London: Academic.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moscovici, S. (1992). Communication introductive a la premiere conference internationale sur les representations sociales. Ravello: Italy
Orfali, B. (2002). Active Minorities and Social Representations: Two Theories, One Epistemology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 395–416.
Parker, I. (1987). Social representations: Social psychology’s (mis) use of sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17(4), 447–470.
Peirce, C.S. (1878/1998). Charles S. Peirce: The essential writings (Edited by Edward C. Moore). New York: Prometheus Books.
Philogène, G., & Deaux, K. (2001). Introduction. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 3–7). Oxford: Blackwell
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Cannichael ’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1999). Social representations and discursive psychology: From cognition to action. Culture and Psychology, 5(4), 447–458.
Potter, J., & Litton, I. (1985). Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 81–90.
Psaltis, C., & Duveen, G. (2006). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation types and representations of gender. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(3), 407–430.
Sammut, G., Clark, M., & Kissaun, G. D. (2014). Dialogue, linguistic hinges and semantic barriers: Social psychological uses and functions of a vulgar term. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.
Sammut, G., & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective‐Taking and the Attribution of Ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(2), 181–200.
Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: a British debate. Culture and psychology, 11(4), 431–454.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Volume 4, edited by R.W. Riebern (Translated by M.J. Hall). New York: Plenum Press.
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Verma, J., & Themel, M. (2000). ‘I have some faith and at the same time I don’t believe’: Cognitive polyphasia and cultural change in India. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 301–314.
Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F., & Lahnsteiner, I. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum: Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 671–688.
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development. Human Development, 50, 208–229.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kadianaki, I., Gillespie, A. Alterity and the Transformation of Social Representations: A Sociocultural Account. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 73–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9285-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9285-z