Advertisement

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 299–321 | Cite as

The Dialogical Dance: Self, Identity Construction, Positioning and Embodiment in Tango Dancers

Regular Article

Abstract

Argentine tango is a complex phenomenon, involving music, dancing and lifestyle, today practiced by hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. This is already a good reason for psychology to make it an object of study. Besides, studying tango could also help to develop a dialogical way of theorizing and a dialogical methodology, taking into account both the genetic historical and eso-systemic dimensions and the individual experiencing. As any other product of human psyche, tango creates an universal and abstract representation of life starting from very situated and individual acts. Such institutionalized representation, which is at the same time epistemological, ethical and aesthetical, becomes a tradition -that is the framework distanced from the individual immediate experience- within which the meaning of the experiences to be make sense in return. To illustrate this epistemological and methodological stance, a history of the development of tango as dialogical social object first is sketched. Then, an ethnographic study about the Self actuation in a community of Italian tango dancers is presented. Results show how participants construct and actuate their identities in a dialogue between their I-positions inside and outside tango community.

Keywords

Argentine tango Self actuation Identity Embodied knowledge Dialogic epistemology I-positioning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by the Marie Curie IEF-2012 grant “EPICS. Epistemology in psychological science, the heritage of Giambattista Vico and the cultural psychology” at Aalborg University (Denmark).

References

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. (2006). Rescuing autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azzi, M. S. (1991). Antropologia del tango. Los protagonistas. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de Olavarria.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrionuevo Anzaldi, F. (2012). The transformation of popular culture into a touristic “experience economy”. Paper presented at the 2nd ISA Forum of Sociology, Social Justice and Democratization, Buenos Aires, 1–4 August 2014, 1–22.Google Scholar
  6. Budgeon, S. (2003). Identity as an embodied event. Body & Society, 9(1), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cámara De Landa, E. (2007). Three perspectives for the study of hybridization in the Italian tango. Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, XIV(2), 145–166.Google Scholar
  8. Castro, D. S. (1991). The Argentine tango as social history, 1880–1955. Lewinston: Mellen.Google Scholar
  9. Collier, S., Cooper, A., Azzi, M. S., & Martin, R. (1995). Tango! The dance, the song, the story. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  10. Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies interventions and radical research. The Drama Review, 46(2), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dejours, C. (1989). Recherches psychanalytiques sur le corps. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  12. Dibbel-Hope, S. (2000). The use of dance/movement therapy in psychological adaptation to breast cancer. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 27(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. dos Santos, E. (1978). La historia del tango: Las cantantes 13. Buenos Aires: Corregidor.Google Scholar
  14. Duranti, A. (1997). Indexical speech across Samoan communities. American Anthropologist, 99(2), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrer, H. A. (1960). El tango: Su historia y evolucion. Buenos Aires: A. Pena Lillo.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrer, H. A. (1980). El libro del tango: Arte popular de Buenos Aires. Tomo I: Cronica del tango. Barcelona: Antonio Tersol.Google Scholar
  17. Fieiro Pompo, M. (1991). Goce analitico del tango. Buenos Aires: Gmpo Editor Latinoamericarto.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Gobello, J. (1980). Cronica general del tango. Buenos Aires: Editorial Fraterna.Google Scholar
  21. Gobello, J. (1999). Breve historia crítica del tango. Buenos Aires: Corregidor.Google Scholar
  22. Haboush, A., Floyd, M., Caron, J., LaSota, M., & Alvarez, K. (2006). Ballroom dance lessons for geriatric depression: an exploratory study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 33, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamera, J. (2005). All the (dis)comforts of home: place, gendered self-fashioning, and solidarity in a ballet studio. Text and Performance Quarterly, 25(2), 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayano, D. M. (1982). Poker faces: The life and work of professional card players. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hermans, J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: from information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hess, R. (1996). Le tango. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  27. Jodelet, D. (2005). Formes et figures de l’altérité. In M. Sanchez-Mazas & L. Licata (Eds.), L’Autre: Regards psychosociaux (pp. 23–47). Grenoble: Les Presses de l’Université de Grenoble.Google Scholar
  28. Kohan, P. (2007). Carlos Vega y la teoría hispanista del origen del tango. Espacios de Crítica y Producción, 34, 74–85.Google Scholar
  29. Labraña, L., & Sebastiàn, A. (2000). Tango, una historia. Buenos Aires: Corregidor.Google Scholar
  30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Low, S. M. (2003). Embodied space(s): anthropological theories of body, space, and culture. Space and Culture, 6(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luckmann, T. (2008). On social interaction and the communicative construction of personal identity, knowledge and reality. Organization Studies, 29(2), 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynn Gray, A. E. (2001). The body remembers: dance/movement therapy with an adult survivor of torture. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 23(1), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marechal, L. (1970). Megafón o la guerra. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta y Perfil Libros.Google Scholar
  35. Markova, I. (2003). Dialogical triads and three-component processes. In I. Markova (Ed.), Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind (pp. 147–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Markova, I. (2006). On “The Inner Alter” in dialogue. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1(1), 125–147.Google Scholar
  37. McKibben, H. (1988). Dance-movement therapy with the medical population. Presentation at the 23rd National Conference of ADTA, November 1988, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  38. McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moscovici, S. (Ed.). (1984). Psychologie social. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  40. Olsewski, B. (2008). El Cuerpo del Baile: the kinetic and social fundaments of tango. Body & Society, 14(2), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinniger, R., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Brown, R. F., & McKinley, P. (2013). Tango dance can reduce distress and insomnia in people with self-referred affective symptoms. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 35, 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollock, D. (2007). The performative “I”. Cultural Studies–Critical Methodologies, 7(3), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosa, A. (2007). Acts of psyche: Actuation as synthesis of semiosis and action. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 205–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salas, H. (1996). El tango: Una guía definitiva. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.Google Scholar
  45. Salmon, R. O. (2000). The tango: its origins and meaning. Journal of Popular Culture, 10(4), 859–866.Google Scholar
  46. Savigliano, M. E. (1995a). Whiny ruffians and rebellious broads: tango as spectacle of eroticized social tension. Theatre Journal, 47(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Savigliano, M. E. (1995b). Tango and the political economy of passion. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  48. Siegman, J. (2006). El Tao del tango. Victoria: Editorial Trafford.Google Scholar
  49. Simão, L. (2010). Ensaios dialógicos: Compartilhamento e diferença nas relações eu-outro. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.Google Scholar
  50. Sudnow, D. (1981). Ways of the hand: The organization of improvised conduct. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  51. Targhetta, R., Napals, B., & Perney, P. (2013). Argentine tango: another behavioral addiction? Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ulloa, N. (1982). Tango, rebelion y nostalgia. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de America Latina.Google Scholar
  53. Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Valsiner, J. (2007). Locating the self…looking for the impossible? Or maybe the impossible is the only possibility. Paper presented at the conference “Culturalization of the Self”, Chemnitz, DE, December 1, 2007.Google Scholar
  55. Viladrich, A. (2006). Neither virgins nor whores: tango lyrics and gender representations in the tango world. The Journal of Popular Culture, 39(2), 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Villa, P.-I. (2006). Sexy bodies: Eine soziologische reise durch den geschlechtskörper. Berlin: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations