Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 239–269 | Cite as

Common Sense of Experts

Social Representations of Justice Amongst Professionals
Regular Article


The dialectics between different modes of knowledge is at the very core of social sciences. In particular, the theory of social representations looks at expert and lay modes as they were not peculiar of specific domains but rather as they were mutually interdependent. Based on the conceptual distinction between reified and consensual universes, this article explores the interplay between these two sources of knowledge through the analysis of the social representations of justice produced by justice professionals. In particular, the exploration of the social representations of justice amongst experts offers intriguing clues to overtake the idea that the lay understanding of justice is somehow opposed to the expert viewpoint and to accept the polyphasic understanding of this complex object. The article reports the findings of a qualitative investigation of the social representations of justice amongst professionals. The staff members of the Youth Social Services (YSS) and the Juvenile Classification Home and Residential Community (JCHRC) were interviewed, and transcriptions were content analysed. The findings indicated that professionals generate multiple theories of justice with each presenting a particular articulation of the basic interplay between expert and lay viewpoints. Most important, findings indicate that the context of everyday working practice has a significant symbolic valence that goes beyond the boundaries of the reified context of institutional justice system.


Social representations Common sense Expert knowledge Lay knowledge Justice 


  1. Abric, J.-C. (1994). Pratiques sociales et representations [Social practices and representations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  2. Augoustinos, M. (2001). Social categorisation: Toward Theoretical Integration. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the Social: bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Augoustinous, M., & Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bangerter, A. (1995). Rethinking the relation between science and common sense: A comment of the current state of SR theory. Papers on Social Representations, 4(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
  6. Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2009). A Social Representations approach to the communication between differentspheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 415–433.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research in social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
  8. Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: a progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 38(4), 335–353.Google Scholar
  9. Berti, C., Mestitz, A., Palmonari, A., & Sapignoli, M. (1998). Avvocati, magistrati e processo penale. Analisi socio-psicologica di una fase di transizione [Lawyers, magistrates, and penal proceeding. Socio-psychological analysis of a transitional phase]. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
  10. Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric, and attitudes. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  11. Brisbin, R. A., & Hunter, S. (1992). Perceptions of Justice: clientele evaluations of conflict adjustment by a utility regulatory agency. Social Justice Research, 5(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
  12. Bruner, J. S. (1992). A Psychologist and the Law. New York Law School Law Review, 37, 173–183.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. S. (2002). La fabbrica delle storie. Diritto, letteratura, vita [The factory of stories. Law, literature, life]. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S. (2004). Life as a Narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710.Google Scholar
  15. Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community, and development: towards a social psychology of participation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 255–270.Google Scholar
  16. Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Castro, P., & Batel, S. (2008). Social representation, change and resistance: On the difficulties of generalizing new norms. Culture & Psychology, 14(4), 475–497.Google Scholar
  18. Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1995). La représentation sociale de la justice: une approche des droits dans la pensée ordinaire [Social representation of justice : a legal approach within the everyday thinking]. L’Année Sociologique, 45, 371–400.Google Scholar
  19. Corsaro, W. A. (1986). Routines in Peer Culture. In J. Cook-Gumperz, W. A. Corsaro, & J. Streeck (Eds.), Children’s worlds and children’s language (pp. 231–252). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current directions in psychological science, 1, 10–13.Google Scholar
  21. Darley, J. M., & Gromet, D. M. (2010). The psychology of punishment: Intuition and reason, retribution and restoration. In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 229–249). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659–683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Darley, J., Fulero, S., Haney, C., & Tyler, T. (2002). Psychological Jurisprudence. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into twenty-first century (pp. 35–59). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. de Morais Shimizu, A., & de Stefano Menin, M. S. (2004). Representações sociais de lei, justiça e injustiça : uma pesquisa com jovens argentinos e brasileiro utilizando a técnica de evocação livre de palavras [Social Representations of law, justice, and injustice : a research with young people from Argentina and Brazil through the technique of free associations. Estudos de Psicologia, 9(2), 239–247.Google Scholar
  25. de Rosa, A. (1994). From theory to metatheory in social representations: The lines of argument of a theoretical-methodological debate. Social Science Information, 33(2), 273–304.Google Scholar
  26. Demazière, D., & Dubar, C. (2000). Dentro le storie. Analizzare le interviste biografiche [Into the stories. The analysis of biographical interviews]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
  27. Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441.Google Scholar
  28. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis. A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Di Masso, A. (2012). Grounding Citizenship: Toward a Political Psychology ofPublic Space. Political Psychology, 33(1), 123–143.Google Scholar
  30. Doise, W. (2003). Human Rights: Common Meaning and Differences in Positioning. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 19(3), 201–210.Google Scholar
  31. Doise, W. (2010). Confini ed Identità. La costruzione sociale dei diritti umani [Boundaries and Identity. The Social Contruction of Human Rights]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  32. Doise, W., & Papastamou, S. (1987). Représentations sociales des causes de la délinquance : croyances générales et cas concrets. Déviance et Société, 11, 153–162.Google Scholar
  33. Doise, W., Spini, D., & Clémence, A. (1999). Human Rights studied as social representations in a cross national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  34. Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dubouchet, J. (2002). Les représentations sociales de la justice pénale. Retour sur un chantier abandonné [Social Representations of criminal justice. Coming back to a deserted building site]. Déviance & Société, 28(2), 179–194.Google Scholar
  36. Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the Knowledge of Politics and the Politics of Knowledge: How a Social Representations Approach Helps Us Rethink the Subject of Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 32(5), 729–758.Google Scholar
  37. Elster J. (1995a). Giustizia Locale. Come le istituzioni assegnano i beni scarsi e gli oneri necessari. Bologna: Feltrinelli [trad. it. Local Justice. How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens].Google Scholar
  38. Elster, J. (1995b). The Empirical Study of Justice. In D. Miller & M. Walzer (Eds.), Pluralism, Justice and Equality (pp. 81–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Feather, N., & Boeckmann, R. (2013). Perceived legitimacy of judicial authorities in relation to degree of value discrepancy with public citizens. Social Justice Research, 26(2), 193–217.Google Scholar
  41. Finkel, N. J. (1995). Commonsense Justice: Jurors’ notions of the Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Finkel, N. J. (1997). Commonsense Justice, Psychology, and the Law. Prototypes that are common, sensful and not. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 2(3), 461–489.Google Scholar
  43. Finkel, N. J. (2000a). Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(3), 591–628.Google Scholar
  44. Finkel, N. J. (2000b). Is justice just to us? A symposium on the use of social science to inform the substantive criminal law: commonsense justice, culpability, and punishment. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 669–705.Google Scholar
  45. Finkel, N., Harre, R., & Lopez, J. R. (2001). Commonsense morality across cultures. Notions of fairness, justice, honor and equity. Discourse Studies, 3(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
  46. Flick, U. (1998). Everyday knowledge in social psychology. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Psychology of the Social (pp. 41–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Flick, U. (2000). Qualitative Research-state of the art. Social Science Information, 41(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  48. Flick, U. (2002). Qualitative Inquiry into social representation of health. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 315–324.Google Scholar
  49. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  50. Folger, R. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice: Multi-faceted meanings and interrelations. Social Justice Research, 9, 395–416.Google Scholar
  51. Foster, J. (2003). Representational projects and interacting forms of knowledge. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(3), 231–244.Google Scholar
  52. Galanter, M. (2006). Law, anti-law and social science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
  53. Galli, I., & Fasanelli, R. (1995). Health and Illness: A contribution to the research in the field of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 4(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  54. Gillespie, A. (2008). Social representations, alternative representations and semantic barriers. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 375–391.Google Scholar
  55. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Restoration and Retribution: How Including Retributive Components Affects the Acceptability of Restorative Justice Procedures. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 395–432.Google Scholar
  57. Hammack, P. L., & Pilecki, A. (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for political psychology. Political Psychology, 33(1), 75–103.Google Scholar
  58. Hammer, R., Nills-Robert, C., & Widmer, E. D. (2009). Subjective proximity to crime or social representations? Explaining sentencing attitudes in Switzerland. Social Justice Research, 22(4), 351–368.Google Scholar
  59. Howarth, C. (2006a). A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 65–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Howarth, C. (2006b). How social representations of attitudes have informed attitude theories: The consensual and the reified. Theory and psychology, 16(5), 691–714.Google Scholar
  61. Howarth, C. (2007). Racialisation, Re-presentation and Resistance. In G. Moloney & I. Walker (Eds.), Within applied representation: Identity as content, process and power (pp. 131–156). Palgrave Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
  62. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Jahoda, G. (1988). Critical notes and reflections on “social representations”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 195–209.Google Scholar
  64. Jasso, G. (2005). Culture and the sense of justice. A comprehensive framework for analisys. Journal of cross – Cultural Psychology, 36, 14–47.Google Scholar
  65. Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and Social Representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  66. Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and ‘The Other’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Joffe, H. (2002). Social Representations and Health Psychology. Social Science Information, 41(4), 559–580.Google Scholar
  68. Jovchelovitch, S. (2001). Social Representations, Public Life, and Social Constructionism. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the Social: bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 165–182). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Jovchelovitch, S. (2002a). Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation. Psychologie et société, 5(1), 121–138.Google Scholar
  70. Jovchelovitch, S. (2002b). Social representations and narratives : stories of public life in Brazil. In J. Lazlo & W. Rogers (Eds.), Narrative and social psychology. Budapest, Hungary: Budapest University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Kirchler, E., Maciejovsky, B., & Schneider, F. (2003). Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and tax flight: Do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 535–553.Google Scholar
  72. Languin, N., Widmer, E., Kellerhals, J., & Robert, C.-N. (2004). Les représentations sociales de la justice pénale : une trilogie [Social representations of criminal justice : a trilogy]. Déviance & Société, 28(2), 159–178.Google Scholar
  73. László, J. (1997). Narrative organisation of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 6(2), 155–172.Google Scholar
  74. Laxminarayan, M. (2012). The effect of retributive and restorative sentencing on psychological effects of criminal proceedings. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, XX, 1–18.Google Scholar
  75. Lerner, M. J. (2003). The justice motive: where social psychology found it, how they lost it, and why they may not find it again. Personality and Social psychology Review, 7(4), 388–399.Google Scholar
  76. Lind, E. A., Ambrose, M., de Vera Park, M., & Kulik, C. (1990). Perspective and procedural Justice. Attorney and Litigant Evaluations of Court Procedures. Social Justice Research, 4(4), 325–336.Google Scholar
  77. Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 1–43). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  78. Markovà, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations. The dynamic of mind (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Marková, I. (2008). The Epistemological Significance of the Theory of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 461–487.Google Scholar
  80. McKinlay, A., & Potter, J. (1987). Social Representations: A conceptual critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17(4), 471–487.Google Scholar
  81. Melton, G. B. (1990). Law, science, and humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 315–332.Google Scholar
  82. Melton, G. B. (1992). The law is a good thing (Psychology, is too): Human Rights in Psychological Jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 381–398.Google Scholar
  83. Melton, G. B. (2000). Community change, community stasis, and the law. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 523–540). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  84. Morant, N. (1995). What is mental illness? Social representations of mental illness among British and French mental health professionals. Papers on social representations, 4(1), 41–52.Google Scholar
  85. Morant, N. (2006). Social representations and professional knowledge: The representation of mental illness among mental health practitioners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 817–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Morant, N., & Edwards, E. (2012). Police Responses to Diversity: A Social Representational Study of Rural British Policing in a Changing Representational Context. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 281–296.Google Scholar
  87. Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition (pp. 181–210). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  88. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, Paris: Cambridge University, Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
  89. Moscovici, S. (1992, October). Discorso presentato alla prima Conferenza Internazionale sulle Rappresentazioni Sociali [Lecture presented at the 1° International Conference on Social Representations], Ravello, IT. Retrieved from:
  90. Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: from the “naïve” to the “amateur” scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions (pp. 98–125). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  91. Moscovici, S., & Markovà, I. (2000). Ideas and their development: A dialogue between Serge Moscovici and Ivana Marková. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology (pp. 224–286). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  92. Muhr, T. (1994). Atlas.ti computer aided text interpretation and theory building. User’s manual. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
  93. Muhr, T. (1997a). Visual qualitative data analysis management model building in education research and business. User’s manual and reference. New version 4.1 designed for Windows 95 and Windows NT. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
  94. Muhr, T. (1997b). Atlas.ti – The knowledge workbench. Visual qualitative data analysis management model building. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.Google Scholar
  95. Nuno-Gutierrez, B. L., Alvarez-Nemegyei, J., & Rodriguez-Cerda, O. (2008). Social representations used by the parents of Mexican adolescent drug users under treatment to explain their children’s drug use: gender differences in parental narratives. Adolescence, 43(170), 351–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Palmonari, A., & Emiliani, F (2009). Paradigmi delle rappresentazioni sociali [Pharadigmes of Social Representations]. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  97. Patrizi, P., Bussu, A., & De Gregorio, E. (2005). Rappresentazioni e percezioni dell’opinione pubblica sull’apparato giudiziario. Indagine su due valori a confronto: difesa dei diritti del cittadino e i doveri del Servizio Giustizia [Representations and public opinion perceptions of the justice system. An investigation on two values: the defence of citizens’ rights vs. the duty of Justice Services]. Unpublished Paper presented at the Annual Meeting “Il Valore dei Valori”, Catania/Enna, 7–8 October.Google Scholar
  98. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  99. Pirttilä‐Backman, A.-M., Kassea, R., & Sakki, I. (2009). Human and peoples’ rights: Social representations among Cameroonian students. International Journal of Psychology, 44(6), 459–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research. Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  101. Purkhardt, S. C. (1993). Transforming social representations: a social psychology of common sense and science. London New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Robinson, P. H. (2006). Competing conceptions of modern desert: vengeful, deontological, and empirical. University of Pennsylvania Law School, Paper no. 104. Retrieved from:
  103. Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability and blame: Community views and criminal laws. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  104. Sanders, T., & Roberts, J. V. (2000). Public attitudes toward conditional sentencing: Results of a national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 32(4), 199–207.Google Scholar
  105. Silbey, S. S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323–368.Google Scholar
  106. Silbey, S. S. (2010). Legal culture and cultures of legality. In J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M.-C. Lo (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Sociology (pp. 470–479). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Sonn, C. C. (2012). Speaking Unspoken Memories: Remembering Apartheid Racism in Australia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18(3), 240–251.Google Scholar
  108. Spini, D., & Doise, W. (1998). Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603–622.Google Scholar
  109. Staerklé, C., & Clémence, A. (2004). Why People are Committed to Human Rights and Still Tolerate Their Violation: A Contextual Analysis of the Principle-Application Gap. Social Justice Research, 17, 389–406.Google Scholar
  110. Stalans, L. J. (1992). Citizens’ procedural expectations about their upcoming audit: Their nature and formation. Social Justice Research, 5(1), 93–107.Google Scholar
  111. Stalans, L., & Lind, E. A. (1997). The meaning of procedural fairness: a comparison of taxpayers’ and representatives’ views of their tax audits. Social Justice Research, 10(3), 311–331.Google Scholar
  112. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  113. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 555–589.Google Scholar
  114. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  115. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall: Chigago.Google Scholar
  116. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Why people obey the law. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  117. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Restorative justice and procedural justice: dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 307–326.Google Scholar
  118. Verkuyten, M., Rood-Pijpers, E., Elffers, H., & Hessing, D. J. (1994). Rules for breaking formal rules: social representations and everyday rule-governed behaviour. The Journal of Psychology, 128(5), 485–497.Google Scholar
  119. Vermunt, R., & Törnblom, K. (1996). Introduction: Distributive and Procedural Justice. Social Justice Research, 9(4), 305–310.Google Scholar
  120. Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: a British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11(4), 431–454.Google Scholar
  121. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Themel, M., & Verma, J. (1999a). The modernisation of tradition: Thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture and Psychology, 5, 413–445.Google Scholar
  122. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Marková, I. (1999b). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 59–89.Google Scholar
  123. Walmsley, C. J. (2004). Social representations and the study of professional practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(4), 1–18.Google Scholar
  124. Wenzel, M., & Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 450–470.Google Scholar
  125. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History, Society and Human StudiesUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations