Theories of Attachment: The Long and Winding Road to an Integrative Developmental Science

Abstract

Although traditional accounts of attachment theory attempted to partition the organism’s attachment and separation responses into those that were instinctive and those that were the result of the developmental environment, recent findings from epigenetics are indicating that no such partitioning is possible, even in principle. Rather than assuming the expression of a given behavioral trait is based on some set of instincts (as Bowlby and many of his colleagues did for attachment and separation responses), behavioral development is now seen as a self-organizing, probabilistic process in which pattern and order emerge and change as a result of ongoing co-actions among developmentally relevant components both internal (e.g., genes, hormones, neural networks) and external (e.g., temperature, diet, social interaction) to the organism. Exploring the specific prenatal and postnatal features of the mother–infant interaction system is providing a new appreciation of the complexity of the origins and maintenance of early attachment and its long-term consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Lachmann, F., Feldstein, S., Crown, C., & Jasnow, J. (2000). Systems models in development and psychoanalysis: the case of vocal rhythm coordination and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 21, 99–122. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(200001/04)21:1/2<99::AID-IMHJ11>3.0.CO;2-#.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., Markese, S., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., et al. (2008). Microanalysis of mother–infant interaction at 4-months predicts 12-month attachment. Attachment and Human Development (in press).

  3. Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 33, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, vol. 1. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cairns, R. B. (1998). The making of developmental psychology. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, vol 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 25–106). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, J., Fouse, S., & Fan, G. (2007). Epigenetic regulation of neural gene expression and neural function. Pediatric Research, 61, 58R–63R. doi:10.1203/pdr.0b013e3180457635.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fish, E. W., Shahrokh, D., Bagot, R., Caldji, C., Bredy, T., Szyf, M., & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epepigenetic programming of stress responses through variations in maternal care. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 167–180. doi:10.1196/annals.1330.011.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, N., & Card, J. A. (1999). Psychophysiological measures in the study of attachment. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., & Meaney, M .J. (1999). Nongenomic transmission across generations in maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science, 286, 1155– 1158.

  11. Gottlieb, G. (1971). Development of Species identification in birds. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature–nurture: Prenatal origins of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gottlieb, G., & Lickliter, R. (2004). The various roles of animal models in understanding human development. Social Development, 13, 311–325. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.000269.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haraway, M. M., & Maples, E. G. (1998). Species-typical behavior. In Comparative psychology: A handbook (pp. 191–197). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hofer, M. A. (1994). Early relationships as regulators of infant physiology and behavior. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway), 397, 9–18. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13260.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofer, M. A. (2006). Psychobiological roots of early attachment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 84–88. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00412.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson-Pynn, J., Fragaszy, D. M., & Cummin-Sebree, S. (2003). Common territories in comparative and developmental psychology: quest for shared means and meanings in behavioral investigations. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston, T. D., & Edwards, L. (2002). Genes, interactions, and development. Psychological Review, 109, 26–34. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnston, T. D., & Gottlieb, G. (1981). Development of visual species identification in ducklings: what is the role of imprinting? Animal Behaviour, 29, 1082–1099. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80061-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levenson, J. M., & Sweatt, J. D. (2005). Epigenetic mechanisms in memory formation. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6, 108–118. doi:10.1038/nrn1604.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lickliter, R. (2005). Prenatal sensory ecology and experience: implications for perceptual and behavioral development in precocial birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 235–274. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(05)35006-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260–280. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.260.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lickliter, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2007). Thinking about development: the value of animal-based research for the study of human development. European Journal of Developmental Science, 1, 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lickliter, R., & Gottlieb, G. (1985). Social interaction with siblings is necessary for the visual imprinting of species-specific maternal preference in ducklings. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 99, 371–378. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.99.4.371.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorenz, K. (1937). The companion in the bird’s world. The Auk, 54, 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506. doi:10.1126/science.134.3489.1501.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Michel, G., & Moore, C. (1995). Developmental psychobiology: An integrative science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, D. B. (1997). The effects of nonobvious forms of experience on the development of instinctive behavior. In C. Dent-Reed, & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development (pp. 457–507). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moffit, T. E. (2005). The new look of behavioral genetics in developmental psychopathology: gene–environment interplay in antisocial behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 533–554. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Polan, H. J., & Hofer, M. A. (1999). Psychobiological origins of infant attachment and separation responses. In J. Cassidy, & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (pp. 162–180). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shanahan, M. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2005). Social context in gene–environment interactions: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Gerontology, 60B, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weaver, C. G., Diorio, J., Seckl, M. R., Szyf, M., & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Environmental regulation of hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor gene expression: characterization of intracellular mediators and potential genomic targets. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1024, 182–212. doi:10.1196/annals.1321.099.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. West, M. J., King, A. P., & White, D. J. (2003). The case for developmental ecology. Animal Behaviour, 66, 617–622. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Lickliter.

Additional information

The writing of this commentary was supported by NICHD grant RO1 HD048432. I thank Lorraine Bahrick for constructive comments on a draft of the commentary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lickliter, R. Theories of Attachment: The Long and Winding Road to an Integrative Developmental Science. Integr. psych. behav. 42, 397–405 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9073-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Attachment
  • Comparative psychology
  • Animal models
  • Epigenetics