Skip to main content
Log in

Communication and Cognition: The Social Beyond Language, Interaction and Culture

  • Target Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognition theories describe the social with terms like language, interaction or culture, whose theoretical status has also been discussed in modern sociology. These concepts are not well-positioned to understand the emergence and autonomy of social orders. Sociological theory of self-referential systems can be useful to reconstruct the bottom-up process which contributes to the emergence of the social as communication as well as to describe the way in which society exerts downward causation upon cognitive phenomena. The core of this theory is the systemic category of meaning as a shared horizon for psychic and social systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baecker, D. (2005). Form und Formen der Kommunikation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. (2006). The social ontology of persons. In J. I. M. Carpendale & U. Muller (Eds.), Social interaction and the development of knowledge (pp. 111–132). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernilo, D. (2002). The theorization of social-coordinations in differentiated societies. British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 431–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. (2001). The significance of emergence. In B. Lower & G. Gillent (Eds.), Physicalism and its discontents (pp. 207–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmeche, C., Koppe, S., & Stjerfelt, F. (2000). Levels, emergence, and three versions of downward causation. In P. Bogh, C. Emmeche, N. Finnemann, & P. Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation. Minds, bodies and matter (pp. 13–33). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Hofkirchner, W. (2005). The dialectic of bottom-up and top-down emergence in social systems. Triple C, 1(1), 28–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. (1983). Synergetics. An introduction. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, A. (2006). Complejidad y cognición. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Psychology: Universidad Católica de Chile.

  • Ibáñez, A. (2007). Complexity and cognition: A metha-theoretical analysis of the mind and brain as a topological dynamical system. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 11(1), 51–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R. (1991). Jean Piaget: The unknown sociologist? British Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1971). Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie. In J. Habermas & N. Luhmann (Eds.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? (pp. 25–100). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1985). Die Autopoiesis des Bewußtseins. Soziale Welt, 36(4), 402–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1991). Erleben und Handeln. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 3 (pp. 67–80). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Intersubjektivität oder Kommunikation: Unterschiedliche Ausganspunkte soziologischer Theoriebildung. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 6 (pp. 169–188). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascareño, A. (2007). Sociología de la cultura. La deconstrucción de lo mapuche. Estudios Públicos, 105, 61–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyering, T. (2000). Physicalism and downward causation in psychology and the special sciences. Inquiry, 43, 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., & Read, S. (1998). Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijnck, W. (2004). Two types of mental causation. Philosophical Explorations, 7(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (2000). A macro cultural–psychological theory of emotions. In P. Schultz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in education (pp. 85–100). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva, G. (2006). Being-in-the-world-with: Presence meets social and cognitive neuroscience. In G. Riva, M. Anguera, B. Wiederhold, & F. Mantovani (Eds.), From communication to presence: cognition, emotion and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli (pp. 47–80). Amsterdam: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. (2001). Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 551–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. (2002). Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory, 20(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, J. (1998). Emergence: Non-deductibility or downwards causation? The Philosophical Quarterly, 48(193), 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P. (1999). Complexity theories, social theory, and the question of social complexity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31(3), 323–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Brown, G. (1979). Laws of form. New York: H.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P. (2000). The dialogical integration of the brain in social semiosis: Edelman and the case for downward causation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1990). Conocer. Barcelona: Gedisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six view of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 625–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Agustín Ibáñez for his generosity with bibliographical references and his knowledge, Dr. Diego Cosmelli for his helpful critical remarks and Dr. Daniel Chernilo for several discussions on the theory of symbolically generalized communication media.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Mascareño.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mascareño, A. Communication and Cognition: The Social Beyond Language, Interaction and Culture. Integr. psych. behav. 42, 200–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9046-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9046-3

Keywords

Navigation