Skip to main content
Log in

“Homophobia”: A Dialogical-Semiotic Approach

  • Commentaries
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The target article from Madureira—The psychological basis of homophobia: Construction of a cultural barrier—is a very rich theoretical proposal, drawing on from different fields, from cultural psychology to the dialogical theories of the self. Despite its richness, in this commentary we will question some of its implicit and explicit assumptions. It seems to us that the author treats “homophobia” as a hegemonic cultural discourse, ignoring that a mixture of opposing discourses are nowadays available at a cultural level towards lesbians and gays, with important consequences at interpersonal and intrapersonal level. In addition, the very concept of “homophobia” (with its implicit assumptions from the field of psychopathology: “phobia”) suggests a very static and intrapersonal way of understanding the diversity of the social mechanisms that underlie sexual prejudice. The way the author describes and tries to clarify the semiotic processes implied in the construction of the interpersonal and psychological barrier involved in “homophobia”, in our opinion, also needs to be further developed. The use of the opposition between HEIMWEH and FERNWEH in the explanation of the barrier it is not, from our view, a description of a (semiotic) process but more a description of an outcome. In order to overcome these problems, we suggest some possible ways to approach this phenomenon from a semiotic and dialogical perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. E.g., “Philadelphia”, “Brokeback Mountain”, “Capote”, “Queer eye for the straight guy”, “Will and Grace”, “The L word” are just some examples of films, reality shows and TV series that include gay and lesbian characters in leading roles and that received high public attention and, in some cases, praise.

References

  • Bastos, S. P. (1997). O Estado Novo e os seus vadios. Contribuição para o estudo das identidades marginais e da sua repressão. Lisboa: Dom Quixote.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1999). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (originally published in 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1996). In search of respect—Selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. (1993). Goliath: Britain’s dangerous places. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. (1995). They say you’re crazy: How the world’s most powerful psychiatrists decide who’s normal. Massachusetts: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, C. (2007). Constructing organization through multiplicity: A microgenetic analysis of self-organization in the Dialogical Self. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2 (in press).

  • Dawla, A. S. (2000). Reproductive rights of Egyptian women: Issues for debate. Reproductive Health Matters, 8, 45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, F., & Gonçalves, M. M. (2007). Negotiating motherhood: A dialogical approach. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2 (in press).

  • Duarte, F., Rosa, C., & Gonçalves, M. (2006). Self and dialogical articulation of multivocality: Proposal of an analysis model. International Journal of Idiographic Science, Article 2. (www.valsiner.com/articles/molenvals.htm).

  • Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the ‘other’. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation. Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 223–290). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. (2001). Masculinities. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (pp. 172–174). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephs, I., & Valsiner, J. (1998). How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy: DSM—The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, R. (2001). Culture and family violence. Washington: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, C., & Valsiner, J. (1992). Parental belief systems under the influence: Social guidance of the construction of personal cultures. In I. Sigel, A. McGillicuddy-DeLisi, & J. Goodnow (Eds.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 393–414). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madureira, A. F. (2007). The psychological basis of homophobia: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9024-9.

  • Moritz, M. J. (1995). The gay agenda: Marketing hate speech to main stream media. In R. K. Whillock & D. Slayden (Eds.), Hate speech (pp. 55–79). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. J., & Addison, R. B. (1989). Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1997). On the futility of psychiatric diagnostic manuals (DSMs) and the return of personal agency. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychology, 46, 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (1997). Insanity: The idea and its consequences. (2nd ed.) New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomsen, S. (1997). A top night. Social protest, masculinity and the culture of drinking violence. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2000a, June). Making meaning out of mind: Self-less and self-full dialogicality. Paper presented at the First International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

  • Valsiner, J. (2000b). Culture and human development: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2004, July). The promoter sign: Developmental transformation within the structure of dialogical self. Paper presented at Symposium Developmental aspects of the dialogical self, Gent, Belgium.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Gena Rodrigues for her assistance with the language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel M. Gonçalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonçalves, M.M., Machado, C. “Homophobia”: A Dialogical-Semiotic Approach. Integr. psych. behav. 41, 262–271 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9034-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9034-7

Keywords

Navigation