Skip to main content
Log in

Culture of Science: Strange History of the Methodological Thinking in Psychology

  • Target Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In pre-World-War-II psychology, two directions in methodological thought—the German–Austrian and North American ways—could be differentiated. After the war, the German–Austrian methodological orientation has been largely abandoned. Compared to the pre-WWII German–Austrian psychology, modern mainstream psychology is more concerned with accumulation of facts than with general theory. Furthermore, the focus on qualitative data—in addition to quantitative data—is rarely visible. Only external–physical or statistical-rather than psychological controls are taken into account in empirical studies. Fragments—rather than wholes—and relationships are studied, and single cases that contradict group data are not analyzed. Instead of complex psychological types simple trait differences are studied, and prediction is not followed by thorough analysis of the whole situation. Last (but not least), data are not systematically related to complex theory. These limits have hindered the growth of knowledge in the behavioral sciences. A new return to an updated version of the German–Austrian methodological trajectory is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash, M. G. (1992). Cultural contexts and scientific change in psychology. Kurt Lewin in Iowa. American Psychologist, 47(2), 198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. G. (1999). Scientific changes in Germany 1933, 1945, 1990: Towards a comparison. Minerva, 37, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blount, C., Evans, C., Birch, S., Warren, F., & Norton, K. (2002). The properties of self-report research measures: Beyond psychometrics. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Rennicke, C., & Dekel, S. (2005). Self-enhancement among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attack: Resilience or social maladjustment? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 984–998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2005). Children’s perceptions of discrimination: A developmental model. Child Development, 75(3), 533–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., & Wirth, R. J. (2004). Interindividual differences in intraindividual variation: Balancing internal and external validity. Measurement, 2(4), 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex, C., & Smythe, W. E. (1999). Between numbers and notions. A critique of psychological measurement. Theory and Psychology, 9(6), 739–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujinaga, N., Muramatsu, T., Ogano, M., & Kato, M. (2005). A 3-year follow-up study of “orientation agnosia.” Neuropsychologia, 43, 1222–1226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C. (2001). On the failure of operationism. Theory and Psychology, 11(1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. B., & Markman, E. M. (2005). Appearance questions can be misleading: A discourse based account of the appearance-reality problem. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 233–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshmand, L. T. (2003). Can lessons of history and logical analysis ensure progress in psychological science? Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwing, P., & Lynn, R. (2005). Sex differences in means and variability on the progressive matrices in university students: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 96(4), 505–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S. (1988). Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S., & Byers, B. (1996). Reliability shifts in measurement reactivity: Driven by content engagement or self-engagement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1080–1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangolo, P., Piras, F., & Fias, W. (2005). I can write seven but I can't say it: A case of domain-specific phonological output deficit for numbers. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1177–1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsella, A. J., Dubanoski, J., Hamada, W. C., & Morse, H. (2000). The measurement of personality across cultures. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2003). Positivism, quantification and the phenomena of psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science, and psychometrics. Theory and Psychology, 10(5), 639–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2003a). Pragmatism, positivism and the quantitative imperative. Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2003b). The quantitative imperative. Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2004). Item response models, pathological science and the shape of error. Theory and Psychology, 14(1), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A Manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2005). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. International Journal of Idiographic Science, Article 1. Retrieved October 25, 2005 from http://www.valsiner.com/articles/molenvals.htm.

  • Newman, D. L. (2005). Ego development and ethnic identity formation in rural American Indian adolescents. Child Development, 76(3), 734–746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Notterman, J. M. (2004). Persistent conceptual issues in psychology. A selective update. Theory and Psychology, 14(2), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann, J. (2005). Representations of attachment relationships in children of incarcerated mothers. Child Development, 76(3), 679–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (2002). What IQ tests test. Theory and Psychology, 12(3), 283–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds. The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, D. (1999). Experimental effects. Are they constant or variable across individuals? Theory and Psychology, 9(5), 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (1994). Context and serial-order effects in personality measurement: Limits on the generality of measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2001). The consequences of pairing questions: Context effects in personality measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 332–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind: Multiple-factor analysis for the isolation of primary traits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A., Tomberg, T., Orasson, A., Tikk, A., & Nômm, M. (1999). Paradoxical facilitation of a free recall of nonwords in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain and Cognition, 39, 187–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troop-Gordon, W., & Asher, S. R. (2005). Modifications in children's goals when encountering obstacles to conflict resolution. Child Development, 76(3), 568–582.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A. (2004). The treasures of Pandora’s box. Measurement, 2(4), 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. (Originally published in 1929). In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 57–72). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. (Originally written in 1930). In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1934). Psychology in Germany and Austria. Psychological Bulletin, 31(10), 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Estonian Science Foundation Grant No. 5388.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaro Toomela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toomela, A. Culture of Science: Strange History of the Methodological Thinking in Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 41, 6–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0

Keywords

Navigation