Abstract
We explore whether unionization affects tenure and promotion outcomes. Using data on 4,276 faculty from seven Ohio public universities, we find that unionization increases the probability that an individual will be tenured. Unionization also increases (decreases) the probability that an individual will be a full (assistant) professor. Moreover, unionization may standardize the promotion process across disciplines. The largest effect on the promotion process is related to length of service. Faculty who are with an institution longer are more likely to be tenured or in higher ranks. This result occurs for two reaization (1) The tenure and promotion processes are directly related to the number of years an individual works at an institution. Tenure decisions usually have time limitations, and although promotion decisions are not as directly tied to time, one generally becomes a full professor after the attainment of tenure and the rank of an associate professor; (2) Controlling for other factors, senior union faculty are more likely to be tenured or full professors, and they appear to be able to obtain higher ranks more easily.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, Syed M. and Ahmad R. Karim. “An Empirical Examination of Determinants of Faculty Attitude Toward Collective Bargaining.” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 21 (1992): 79–91.
“The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession 1980–81.” Academe 67 (August 1981): 210–93.
“The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession 1995–96.” Academe 82 (March–April 1996): 14–108.
American Council on Education. 1989–90 Fact Book on Higher Education. New York: Maxmillan Publishing, 1989.
Bacharach, Samuel B., Timothy P. Schmidle, and Scott C. Bauer. “Higher Education.” In Collective Bargaining in American Industry: Contemporary Perspectives and Future Decisions. D. Lipskey and C. Donn, eds. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1987.
Barbezat, Debra. “The Effect of Collective Bargaining on Salaries in Higher Education.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 (April 1989): 443–55.
Blau, Francine and Andrea Beller. “Trends in Earnings Differentials by Gender, 1971–1981.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (July 1988): 513–29.
Benedict, Mary Ellen. “The Union Effect on the Earnings Distribution in Higher Education in Ohio.” American Economist (forthcoming): 1998.
Davidson, Russell and James G. Mackinnon. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Freeman, Richard. “Union Wage Practices and Wage Dispersion within Establishments.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (October 1982): 3–21.
Graf, Lee A., Masoud Hemmasi, Kenneth E. Newgren, and Warren R. Nielsen. “Profiles of Those Who Support Collective Bargaining in Institutions of Higher Learning and Why: An Empirical Examination.” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 23 (1994): 151–62.
Greene, William. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990.
---. Limdep, Version 6.0. New York: Econometric Software, 1992.
Hendry, David. Dynamic Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Julius, Daniel J. and Margaret K. Chandler. “Academic Bargaining Agents in Higher Education: Do Their Achievements Matter?” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 18 (1989): 9–58.
Kaufmann, Bruce. The Economics of Labor Markets. Orlando Fl.: Dryden Press, 1991.
Kemerer, Frank and J. Victor Baldridge. Unions on Campus. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
Kesselring, Randall G. “The Economic Effects of Faculty Unions.” Journal of Labor Research 12 (Winter 1991): 59–72.
Ladd, Evert, Jr. and Seymour Lipset. Professors, Unions, and American Higher Education. Berkeley: California Commission on Higher Education, 1973.
Maddala, G.S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
McKelvey, Richard D. and William Zavoina. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 (1975): 103–20.
Rees, Daniel. “The Effect of Unionization on Faculty Salaries and Compensation: Estimates from the 1980s.” Journal of Labor Research 14 (Fall 1993): 399–422.
Roworth, Wendy Wassyng. “Pandora’s Dilemma: Some Reflections on Peer Review.” Academe 83 (May/June 1997): 35–38.
Smith, Teresa. “The Impact of University Faculty Unionization on the Male-Female Wage Differential.” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 2 (1992): 101–10.
Williams, Gwen B. and Perry A. Zirkel. “Shift in Collective Bargaining Issues in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 18 (1989): 73–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Our thanks to the session participants at the 1996 Missouri Valley Economics Association Conference, to Professor Michael Magura of the University of Toledo who provided most of the data and to an anonymous referree for insightful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benedict, M.E., Wilder, L. Unionization and tenure and rank outcomes in Ohio Universities. J Labor Res 20, 185–201 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-999-1013-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-999-1013-y