A Note on Selection and Gender Unemployment Gaps
Previous research has documented the impact of positive selection into employment on the ranking of countries by gender wage gaps. This note focuses on the impact of selection into labor force on cross-country differences in gender unemployment gaps. We construct the Manski bounds for the selection-free gender unemployment gaps in 26 EU countries and show that - without additional assumptions - the observed gender unemployment gaps carry little information about the selection-free gender differences in unemployment. Contrary to the common assumption of positive selection into labor force (similar to positive selection into employment documented in the gender wage gap research), we also point at an example of negative-selection bias. We show that labor force withdrawal of mothers on job-protected family leaves may lead to an overestimation of the selection-free gender unemployment gaps by as much as 1 p.p.
KeywordsSelection bias Manski bounds Gender unemployment gap
JEL ClassificationJ13 J21 J71
I would like to thank Nikolas Mittag and Štěpán Jurajda for useful comments. This project was financially supported by the Czech Science Foundation, grant number 14-36154G.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Bičáková A (2016) Gender unemployment gaps in the EU: blame the family. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 22(5):1–31Google Scholar
- Manski CF (1989) Anatomy of the selection problem. J Hum Resour 24(3):343–360Google Scholar
- Manski CF (1990) Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Am Econ Rev 80(2):319–323Google Scholar
- Olivetti C, Petrongolo B (2008) Unequal pay or unequal employment? A cross-country analysis of gender gaps. J Labor Econ 26(4):621–654Google Scholar