Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 1–44 | Cite as

Sexual Orientation, Unemployment and Participation: Are Gays Less Employable than Straights?

  • Thierry Laurent
  • Ferhat Mihoubi
Article

Abstract

This paper is the first attempt to assess, in a unified econometric framework, the existence and the magnitude of both the sexual orientation participation gap and the sexual orientation unemployment gap. Having identified male same-sex couples using the Employment Survey, we use a bivariate probit selection model where the labor supply and the employment equation are jointly estimated for the French labor market. The results show that both participation and employment probabilities are significantly lower for gay employees compared to their heterosexual counterparts. Further investigations indicate that young gay workers, particularly, are more exposed to the unemployment risk than older ones. The beginning of a professional career and the subsequent entry to the labor market appear to be difficult steps to overcome for gay workers who spend more time than their heterosexual counterparts to find the good job.

Keywords

Employment discrimination Sexual orientation Queer economics 

JEL classification

J7 J15 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank an anonymous referee for his helpful comments and suggestions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adam B (1981) Stigma and employ ability: discrimination by sex and sexual orientation in the Ontario legal profession. Can Rev Sociol 18(2):216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed AM, Hammarstedt M (2009) Sexual orientation and earnings: a register data based approach to identify homosexuals. J Popul Econ 23(3):835–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed AM, Andersson L, Hammarstedt M (2011) Sexual orientation and occupational rank. Econ Bull 31(3):2422–2433Google Scholar
  4. Antecol H, Steinberger M (2009) Female labor supply differences by sexual orientation: a semi-parametric decomposition approach. IZA Discussion Paper n°4029, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  5. Arrow K (1973) The theory of discrimination. In: Ashenfelter O, Rees A (eds) Discrimination in labor markets. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  6. Badgett L, Donnelly C, Kibbe J (1992) Pervasive patterns of discrimination against lesbians and gay men: evidence from surveys across the United States. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Badgett L, Lau H, Sears B, Ho D (2007) Bias in the workplace: consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. The Williams Institute, University of California Los Angeles, UCLA, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker GS (1957) The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75(299):493–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker GS (1981) A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell AP, Weinberg MS (1978) Homosexualities: a study of diversity among men & women. Simon and Schuster, N.YGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter CS (2004) New evidence on gay and lesbian household incomes. Contemp Econ Policy 22(1):78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiappori P-A (1988) Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56:63–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiappori P-A (1992) Collective labor supply and welfare. J Polit Econ 100:437–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colvin R (2004) The extent of sexual orientation discrimination in Topeka, KS. Policy Brief, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy InstituteGoogle Scholar
  16. Crow SM, Fok LY, Hartman SJ (1998) Who is at greatest risk of work-related discrimination—women, blacks, or homosexuals? Employ Responsib Rights J 11(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Ven V, Praag V (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance. J Econ 17:229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Digoix M, Festy P, Garnier B (2004) What if same-sex couples exist in France after all? In: Digoix M, Festy P (eds) Same-sex couples, same-sex partnerships & homosexual marriages: a focus on cross-national differentials. Ined, Working Paper n°124Google Scholar
  19. Diplacido J (1998) Minority stress among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: a consequence of heterosexism, homophobia, and stigmatization. In: Herek G (ed) Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues, stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals, vol 4. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 138–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drydakis N (2009) Sexual orientation discrimination in the labour market. Labour Econ 16:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drydakis N (2011) Women’s sexual orientation and labor market outcomes in Greece. Fem Econ 17(1):89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drydakis N (2012) Sexual orientation and labour relations: new evidence from Athens. Appl Econ 44(20):2653–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drydakis N (2014) Sexual orientation discrimination in the Cypriot labour market. Distastes or uncertainty? Int J Manpow 35(5):720–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubin JA, Rivers D (1990) Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models. In: Fox J, Long JS (eds) Modern methods of data analysis. Publications, pp 410–443Google Scholar
  25. Elmslie B, Tebaldi E (2007) Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. J Lab Res 28(3):436–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Empire State Pride Agenda (2001) Anti-Gay/Lesbian Discrimination in New York State: analysis of a statewide survey conducted by the Empire State Pride Agenda. www.prideagenda.org/portals/0/pdfs/survey.pdfGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldberg NG, Badgett L, Ramos C (2010) The impact of employment nondiscrimination legislation in South Dakota. Report of the Williams Institute. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Goldberg-Badgett-Ramos-SouthDakota-ENDA-Jan-2010.pdf
  28. Gordon NM, Morton TE (1974) A low mobility model of wage discrimination with special reference to sex differentials. J Econ Theory 7:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (2001) Inside-out: a report on the experiences of lesbians, gays and bisexuals in America and the. Public’s Views on Issues and Policies Related to Sexual OrientationGoogle Scholar
  31. Herek GM (2009) Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United Sates: prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. J Interpers Violence 24(1):54–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herek G, Chopp R, Strohl D (2007) Sexual stigma: putting sexual minority health issues in context. In: Meyer I, Northridge M (eds) The health of sexual minorities: public health perspectives on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations. Springer, New York, pp. 171–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holm A, Jæger MM (2011) Dealing with selection bias in educational transition models: the bivariate probit selection model. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2011.02.002 Google Scholar
  34. Horvath M, Ryan AM (2003) Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles 48(3/4):115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hull K (2005) Employment discrimination based on sexual orientation: dimensions of difference. Rights and Realities, Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research, pp 167–187Google Scholar
  36. Karp B (1997) Gainesville/Alachua county gay and lesbian community survey. Human RightsCouncil of North Central Florida, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  37. Klawitter M, Flatt V (1998) The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbi. J Policy Anal Manag 17(4):658–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lau H, Stotzer RL (2010) Employment discrimination based on sexual orientation: a Hong Kong study. Employ Responsib Rights J 23(1):17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laurent T, Mihoubi F (2012) Sexual orientation and wage discrimination in France: the hidden side of the rainbow. J Lab Res 33:487–527. doi: 10.1007/s12122-012-9145-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leonard A (1985) Employment discrimination against persons with AIDS. Univ Dayton Law Rev 10(3):681–703Google Scholar
  41. Leppel K (2008) Labour force status and sexual orientation. Economica 76(301):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine MP (1979) Employment discrimination against gay men. Int Rev Mod Sociol 9, n°5–7:151–163Google Scholar
  43. Levine MP, Leonard R (1984) Discrimination against lesbians in the work force. Signs 9(4):700–710 The Lesbian IssueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Madon S (1997) What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles 37:663–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mays V, Cochran S (2001) Mental health correlates of perceived discrimination among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. Am J Public Health 91(11):1869–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mihoubi F (2014) Computation of the marginal effects and their variance-covariance matrix for a bivariate probit model with sample selection estimated on survey Data. Department of Economics, Paris-Est Créteil University, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  47. New Jersey Supreme Court (2001) Task force on sexual orientation issues: Final Report. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Task Force on Gay and Lesbian Issues, TrentonGoogle Scholar
  48. Oreffice S (2011) Sexual orientation and household decision making: Same-sex couples’ balance of power and labor supply choices. Labour Econ 18(2):145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oswald A. (1996) A conjecture on the explanation for high unemployment in the industrialized nations: part I. Warwick economics research paper, 475, University of WarwickGoogle Scholar
  50. Out & Equal Workplace Advocates (2003) Gays and lesbians face persistent workplace discrimination and hostility despite improved policies and attitudes in corporate America, findings of new national survey by Out & Equal. Witeck-Combs Communications and Harris Interactive, Out & Equal Workplace Conference, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  51. Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Am Econ Rev 62:659–661Google Scholar
  52. Ramos C, Badgett L, Sears B (2008) Evidence of employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity: complaints filed with state enforcement agencies 1999–2007. The Williams Institute. http://research.policyarchive.org/15682.pdf
  53. Rosky C, Mallory C, Smith J, Badgett L (2011) Employment discrimination against LGBT Utahns. The Williams Institute, January. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Rosky-Mallory-Smith-Badgett-Utah-Emp-Discrim-Jan-11.pdf
  54. Saghir M, Robins E (1973) Male and female homosexuality: a comprehensive investigation. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneider BE (1981) Coming out at work: detriments and consequences of lesbians’ openness at their workplaces, paper delivered at the annual meeting of the society for the study of social problems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  56. Sears B, Mallory C (2011) Documented evidence of employment discrimination and its effects on LGBT people, University of California Los Angeles. UCLA, The Williams InstituteGoogle Scholar
  57. Tebaldi E, Elmslie B (2006) Sexual orientation and labour supply. Appl Econ 38:549–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tilcsik A (2011) Pride and prejudice: employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. Am J Sociol 117(2):586–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Toulemon L, Vitrac J, Cassan F (2005) Le difficile comptage des couples homosexuels d’après l’enquête EHF. In: “Histoires de familles, histoires familiales”, sous la direction de Lefèvre C, Filhon A, Ined, les Cahiers de l’Ined, n° 156, partie IX.32, pp 589–602Google Scholar
  60. Van der Meer PH (2014) Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Soc Indic Res 115(1):23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vest MJ, Carr JC, Tarnoff KA, Vest JM (2006) The influence of fear of aids and expectancies about employees with aids on the decision to fire employees with aids. J Appl Biobehav Res 11(1):44–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ward J (2009) Lesbian stereotypes. In: O’Brien J (ed) Encyclopedia of gender and society. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 492–495Google Scholar
  63. Weichselbaumer (2003) Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Econ 10:629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weichselbaumer D (2004) Is it sex or personality? The impact of sex stereotypes on discrimination in applicant selection. East Econ J 30(2):159–186Google Scholar
  65. Weinberg M, Williams C (1974) Male homosexuals, their problems and adaptations. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies (EPEE)University Evry-Val d’EssonneEvry cedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Economics, ERUDITEUniversity Paris-Est CréteilCréteil cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations