Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 235–261 | Cite as

The Effects of Merit-Based Scholarships on Educational Outcomes

An Analysis of the Arizona AIMS Scholarship
  • Gregory B. UptonJr.


This paper analyzes the effect of a statewide merit-based scholarship program on educational outcomes in Arizona. It tests whether Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) scholarship has an effect on a comprehensive set of educational outcomes such as the number of applicants, student admissions, first-year first-time enrollment, ACT scores of entering freshman, retention rates, as well as on the level of tuition and fees at the three schools targeted by the program; Arizona State University, University of Arizona and Northern Arizona University. Both difference-in-differences estimation as well as synthetic control methods shows that AIMS has an economically and statistically significant effect enrollment. Enrollment effects are greatest among African American and Hispanic students and are significant for both men and women. While point estimates suggest that AIMS also lead to increases in tuition and fees, these results are not robust to placebo tests.


Educational economics Demand for schooling Student financial aid 


  1. Alberto A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Amer Stat Assoc 105(490):493–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery C, Minter Hoxby C (2004) Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In: Hoxby CM (ed) College choices: the economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. University of Chicago Press, pp 239–302Google Scholar
  3. Bettinger E (2004) College choices: the economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it, chap. How Financial Aid Affects Persistence. University of Chicago Press, pp 207–238.
  4. Berger MC, Kostal T (2002) Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education. Econ Educ Rev 21:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce DJ, Carruthers CK (2014) Jackpot? The impact of lottery scholarships on enrollment in Tennessee. J Urban Econ 81:30–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buglar DT, Henry GT, Rubenstein R (1999) An evaluation of Georgia HOPE scholarship program: effects of HOPE on Grade inflation. Academic Performance and College EnrollmentGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohodes SR, Goodman JS (2014) Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams Scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. Amer Econ J Appl Econ 6(4):251–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwell CM, Lee KH, Mustard DB (2005) Student responses to merit scholarship retention rules. J Human Resour 40(4):895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornwell CM, Mustard DB (2007) Merit-based college scholarships and car sales. Educ Financ Policy 2(2):133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwell Christopher M, Mustard DB, Sridhar DJ (2006) The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: evidence from georgia’s HOPE program. J Labor Econ 24(4):761–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dellas H, Koubi V (2003) Business cycles and schooling. Eur J Political Econ 19:843–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dellas H, Sakellaris P (2003) On the cyclicality of schooling: theory and evidence. Oxf Econ Pap 55(1):148–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dynarski S (2004) College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay For It, chap. The New Merit Aid. University of Chicago Press, pp 63–100.
  14. Fitzpatrick MD, Jones D (2012) Higher education, merit-based scholarships and post-baccalaureate migration. NBER Working Paper 18530Google Scholar
  15. Lee U (2010) The impact of labor market conditions on choice of college major. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Lovenheim MF (2011) The effect of liquid housing wealth on college enrollment. J Labor Econ 29(4):741–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovenheim MF, Reynolds CL (2013) The effect of housing wealth on college choices: evidence from the housing boom. J Human Resour 48(1):1–35Google Scholar
  18. Marianna B, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Q J Econ 119(1):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCollum MN, Upton GB (2014) Housing wealth and college enrollment. SSRN 2495449Google Scholar
  20. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience, and earnings. Columbia University Press.
  21. Rees DI, Mocan NH (1997) Labor market conditions and the high school dropout rate: evidence from new york state. Econ Educ Rev 16(2):103–09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott-Clayton J (2011) On Money and Motivation: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Financial Incentives for College Achievement. J Human Resour 46(3):614–646Google Scholar
  23. Sjoquist DL, Winters JV (2013) The effects of HOPE on post-college retention in the Georgia workforce. Reg Sci Urban Econ 43:479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sjoquist DL, Winters JV (2014) Merit aid and post-college retention in the state. J Urban Econ 80:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snyder TD, Dillow SA (2011) Digest of education statistics, 2010. Technical Report, National Center for Education StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang L, Ness EC (2012) Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain?. Educ Eval Policy Anal 32(143):143–165Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Energy Studies, Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations