Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 443–460 | Cite as

Workers, Unions, and Takeovers



How do takeovers affect workers’ wages and job security in the short-run? What role does the labor union play in mitigating these effects? I answer these two questions by analyzing wage and employment outcomes of over 4,000 public firms that were acquired between 1981 and 2002, using establishment-level data from the U.S. Census Bureau. I find that target establishments exhibit a net contraction in wages and employment, relative to comparable establishments after takeovers. Targets’ establishments in more unionized industries experience worse wage and employment outcomes after takeovers. These adverse effects are exacerbated when the establishment is located in a state with Right-to-work laws where unions face a less favorable bargaining environment. These findings indicate that target firms’ employees are negatively affected by takeovers and that their labor unions do not mitigate these negative effects.


Wage Employment Takeovers Labor unions 


  1. Becker B (1995) Union rents as a source of takeover gains among target shareholders. Ind Lab Relat Rev 49:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown C, Medoff JL (1988) The impact of firm acquisition on labor. In: Auerbach AJ (ed) Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen H, Kacperczyk M, Ortiz-Molina H (2009) Labor unions, operating flexibility, and the cost of equity. J Finan Quant Anal 46:25–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis SJ, Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Lerner J, Miranda J (2009) Private equity and employment. Working paper, U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  5. DiNardo JE, Lee DS (2004) Economic impacts of new unionization on private sector employers: 1984–2001. Q J Econ 119:1383–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellwood DT, Fine G (1987) The impact of right-to-work laws on union organizing. J Polit Econ 95:250–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farber H (1984) Right-to-work laws and the extent of unionization. J Labor Econ 2:319–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman RB, Medoff JL (1984) What do unions do? Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirsch BT, Macpherson DA (2003) Union membership and coverage database from the current population survey: Note. Ind Lab Relat Rev 56:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarmin R, Miranda J (2002) The longitudinal business database. Working paper, U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaplan S (1989) The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value. J Finan Econ 24:217–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lichtenberg FR, Siegel D (1990) The effect of ownership changes on the employment and wages of central office and other personnel. J Law Econ 33:383–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maksimovic V, Phillips G, Prabhala NR (2011) Post-merger restructuring and the boundaries of firms. J Finan Econ 102:317–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGuckin R, Nguyen SV (2001) The impact of ownership changes: a view from labor markets. Int J Ind Organ 19:739–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pagano M, Volpin PF (2005) Managers, workers, and corporate control. J Finance 60:841–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosett JG (1990) Do union wealth concessions explain takeover premiums? J Finan Econ 27:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shleifer A, Summers L (1988) Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In: Auerbach AJ (ed) Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cheung Kong Graduate School of BusinessBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations