Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 52–74 | Cite as

The Gender Pay Gap in the US: Does Sector Make a Difference?

  • Paul W. MillerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Analyses of data from the 2000 US Census show that the gender pay gap differs by sector of employment and according to the part of the earnings distribution that is considered. The gender pay differential in the private sector in the US does not display either the glass ceiling or sticky floor effects that have been reported for many other countries. The government sector is, however, characterized by a distinct sticky floor effect in the female–male pay differential. Regardless of the sector of employment, females have lower hourly rates of pay than men across the entire earnings distribution.

Keywords

Earnings Gender Glass ceiling Sticky floor Sector 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges financial support from the Australian Research Council, and the research assistance of Derby Voon.

References

  1. Albrecht J, Björklund A, Vroman S (2003) Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden? J Labor Econ 21:145–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabsheibani GR, Rees H (1998) On the weak vs strong version of the screening hypothesis: a re-examination of the P-Test for the U.K.. Econ Educ Rev 17:189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arulampalam W, Booth A, Bryan M (2007) Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wages distribution. Ind Labor Relat Rev 60:163–186Google Scholar
  4. Autor D H, Katz L F, Kearney M S (2005) Rising wage inequality: the role of composition and prices. mimeo MITGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedard K (2003) School quality and the distribution of male earnings in Canada. Econ Educ Rev 22:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belman D, Heywood JS (1989) Government wage differentials: a sample selection approach. Appl Econ 21:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackaby D, Murphy P, O’Leary N (1999) The payment of public sector workers in the UK: reconciliation with North American findings. Econ Lett 65:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blau FD (1998) Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. J Econ Lit 36:113–165Google Scholar
  9. Blau FD, Kahn LM (1997) Swimming upstream: trends in the gender wage differential in the 1980s. J Labor Econ 15:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blau FD, Kahn LM (2000) Gender differences in pay. J Econ Perspect 14:75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau FD, Kahn LM (2006) The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990s: slowing convergence. Ind Labor Relat Rev 60:45–66Google Scholar
  12. Booth AL, Francesconi M, Frank J (2003) A sticky floors model of promotion, pay and gender. Eur Econ Rev 47:295–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borland J, Hirschberg J, Lye J (1998) Earnings of public sector and private sector employees in Australia: is there a difference? Econ Rec 74:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bridges WP, Nelson RL (1989) Markets in hierarchies: organizational and market influences on gender inequality in a state pay system. Am J Sociol 93:616–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchinsky M (1998a) Recent advances in quantile regression models: a practical guideline for empirical research. J Hum Resour 33:88–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buchinsky M (1998b) The dynamics of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: a quantile regression Approach. J Appl Econ 13:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiswick BR, Le AT, Miller PW (2008) How Immigrants Fare Across the Earnings Distribution: International Analyses. Ind Labor Relat Rev 61:353–373Google Scholar
  18. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2007) The economic costs to native-born americans of limited english language proficiency. In: Chiswick BR, Miller PW (eds) The economics of language: international analyses. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiswick BR, Miller PW (2008) Why is the payoff to schooling smaller for immigrants? Labour Econ (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Choudhury S (1994) New evidence on public sector wage differentials. Appl Econ 26:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fogel W, Lewin D (1974) Wage determination in the public sector. Ind Labor Relat Rev 27:410–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fry R, Lowell BL (2003) The value of bilingualism in the US labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 57:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gregory RG, Borland J (1999) Recent developments in public sector labor markets. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics. vol. 3. Elsevier Science, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  24. Gyourko J, Tracy J (1988) An analysis of public- and private-sector wages allowing for engogenous choices of both government and union status. J Labor Econ 6:229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halvorsen R, Palmquist R (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 70:474–475Google Scholar
  26. Hartog J, Oosterbeek H (1993) Public and private sector wages in the Netherlands. Eur Econ Rev 37:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. He X, Hu F (2002) Markov chain marginal bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc 97:783–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Healy J, Richardson S (2006) An updated profile of the minimum wage workforce in Australia. Australian Fair Pay Commission, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyder A, Reilly B (2005) The public and private sector pay gap in Pakistan: a quantile regression analysis. Pak Dev Rev 44:271–306Google Scholar
  30. Juhn C, Murphy KM, Pierce B (1991) Accounting for the slowdown in black–white wage convergence. In: Kosters M (ed) Workers and their wages. AEI Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Kee HJ (2006) Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Exploring the Australian gender pay gap. Econ Rec 82:408–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le AT, Miller PW (2008) Glass ceiling and double disadvantage effects: women in the US Labor market. Appl Econ (in press)Google Scholar
  33. Lee L (1983) Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 51:507–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewin D (2003) Incentive compensation in the public sector: evidence and potential. J Labor Res 24:597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Machado JA, Mata J (2005) Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression. J Appl Econ 20:445–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martins P, Pereira P (2004) Does education reduce wage inequality? Quantile regression evidence from 16 countries. Labour Econ 11:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyersson Milgrom EM, Petersen T, Snartland V (2001) Equal pay for equal work? Evidence from Sweden and a comparison with Norway and the U.S. Scand J Econ 103:559–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller PW (2005) The role of gender among low-paid and high-paid workers. Aust Econ Rev 38:405–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pham TH, Reilly B (2007) The gender pay gap in Vietnam, 1993–2002: a quantile regression approach. Journal of Asian Economics 18:775–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polachek SW, Robst J (2001) Trends in the male–female wage gap: the 1980s compared with the 1970s. South Econ J 67:869–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Puhani PA (2000) The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. J Econ Surv 14:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Regan TL, Oaxaca RL (2006) Work experience as a source of specification error in earnings models: implications for gender wage decompositions. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1920, BonnGoogle Scholar
  43. Sakellariou C (2004) Gender earnings differentials using quantile regressions. J Labor Res 25:457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shapiro D, Stelcner M (1981) Male–female earnings differentials and the role of language in Canada, Ontario and Quebec, 1970. Can J Econ 14:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith SP (1976a) Government wage differentials by sex. J Hum Resour 11:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith SP (1976b) Pay differentials between federal government and private sector workers. Ind Labor Relat Rev 29:179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tansel A (2005) Public–private employment choice, wage differentials, and gender in Turkey. Econ Dev Cult Change 53:453–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations