Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 115–126 | Cite as

The 150-hour rule as a barrier to entering public accountancy

  • Charles G. Carpenter
  • E. Frank Stephenson
Articles

Abstract

In many states, CPA licensure now requires 150 credit hours of college coursework thereby adding an extra semester or year of schooling beyond typical undergraduate degree requirements. Thus, the “150-hour rule” should increase the cost of becoming a CPA and, consequently, reduce the supply of new CPAs. We test this hypothesis using panel data on the number of first-time candidates for the CPA exam in each state over the years 1985 to 2002. We find that the imposition of the 150-hour education requirement reduces the number of candidates sitting for the CPA exam by 60 percent and that the “grandfathering” provisions of the 150-hour rule produce a substantial transitory increase in the number of candidates sitting for the exam in the year prior to the rule’s effective date. Examination of candidates’ pass rates on the exam also finds behavior consistent with the hypothesis that the 150-hour rule is a barrier to entry.

Keywords

Percent Level Pass Rate Percentage Point Increase Transitory Effect Certified Public Accountant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, A. Frank, John D. Jackson, and Robert B. Ekelund, Jr. “Occupational Licensing in a ‘Competitive’ Labor Market: The Case of Cosmetology.” Journal of Labor Research 23 (Spring 2002): 261–78.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, A. Frank, Robert B. Ekelund, Jr., and John D. Jackson. “Occupational Licensing of a Credence Good: The Regulation of Midwifery.” Southern Economic Journal 69 (January 2003): 659–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianco, David P., ed. Professional and Occupational Licensing Directory, 2nd ed. Detroit, MI: Gale Research, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Byrnes, Nanette. “Where Have All the Accountants Gone?” Business Week (March 27, 2000): 203-204.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, Milton and Simon Kuznets. Income from Independent Professional Practice. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1945.Google Scholar
  6. Frieswick, Kris. “Where Have All the CPAs Gone?” CFO 16 (December 2000): 101–103.Google Scholar
  7. Halvorsen, Robert and Raymond Palmquist. “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.” American Economic Review 70 (June 1980): 474–75.Google Scholar
  8. Kleiner, Morris M. “Occupational Licensing.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (Fall 2000): 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —, Robert Gay, and Karen Greene. “Barriers to Labor Migration: The Case of Occupational Licensing.” Industrial Relations 21 (Fall 1982): 383–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kleiner, Morris M. and Robert T. Kudrle. “Do Tougher Licensing Provisions Limit Occupational Entry? The Case of Dentistry.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3984, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. —. “Does Regulation Affect Economic Outcomes? The Case of Dentistry.” Journal of Law and Economics 43 (October 2000): 547–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, Chi-Wen Jevons, Chiawen Liu, and Taychang Wang. “The 150-Hour Rule.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 27 (April 1999): 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leffler, Keith B. “Physician Licenses: Competition and Monopoly in American Medicine.” Journal of Law and Economics 21 (April 1978): 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lueck, Dean, Reed Olsen, and Michael Ransom. “Market and Regulatory Forces in the Pricing of Legal Services.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 7 (January 1995): 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Association of State Boards of Accountancy. Candidate Performance on the Uniform CPA Examination, 1986–2003 editions.Google Scholar
  16. Pashigian, B. Peter. “Occupational Licensing and the Interstate Mobility of Professionals.” Journal of Law and Economics 22 (April 1979): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peltzman, Sam. “Toward a More General Theory of Economic Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (August 1976): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts, Robin W. and James M. Kurtenbach. “State Regulation and Professional Accounting Educational Reforms: An Empirical Test of Regulatory Capture Theory.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17 (Autumn 1998): 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schaefer, James and Michael Zimmer. “Occupational Licensure in the Accounting Profession: Effects of Public Regulations on Accountants’ Earnings.” Journal of Applied Business Research 11 (Spring 1995): 9–16.Google Scholar
  20. Shepard, Lawrence. “Licensing Restrictions and the Cost of Dental Care.” Journal of Law and Economics 21 (April 1978): 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stigler, George J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science 1 (Spring 1971): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Titard, Pierre L. and Keith A. Russell. “Factors Affecting CPA Examination Success.” Accounting Horizons 3 (September 1989): 53–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles G. Carpenter
    • 1
  • E. Frank Stephenson
    • 2
  1. 1.Francis Marion UniversityFlorence
  2. 2.Berry CollegeMount Berry

Personalised recommendations