Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 241–266 | Cite as

The impact of unions on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover

  • Tove Helland Hammer
  • Ariel Avgar
Article

Abstract

Conclusion The research on the exit-voice hypothesis, both in the United States and abroad, shows convincingly that most of the variance in the negative union effect on job satisfaction can be accounted for by job quality, industrial relation climate, and wages. Union members see their jobs as less attractive than do nonunion workers in terms of skill requirements, task complexity, the amount of autonomy or discretion available, and opportunities for promotion. Union members also perceive the supervision they receive and the labor-management relations they experience as less satisfactory. They are, however, clearly better off with respect to wages, benefits, and pensions. But when it comes to job satisfaction, the economic advantages of union jobs are not sufficient to compensate for job content and work environment factors. It comes as no surprise to the job satisfaction researcher that job content — the nature of the tasks people are given to do — weighs heavily in overall job satisfaction scores. While there are individual differences in the degree to which people prefer intrinsically interesting jobs, there is ample empirical evidence showing that autonomy, skill variety, complexity, challenge, and advancement are important determinants of people's affective reactions to their jobs (Deci, 1975; Hackman and Oldham, 1980; Kanfer, 1990). The relative importance of job content factors to overall job satisfaction is also mirrored in the most commonly used measures of job satisfaction (Weiss et al., 1967).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd, John M. and Henry S. Farber. “Job Queues and the Union Status of Workers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35 (April 1982): 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addison, John T. and Alberto C. Castro. “The Importance of Lifetime Jobs: Differences Between Union and Nonunion Workers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 (April 1987): 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Addison, John T. and John Chilton. “Models of Union Behavior.” In David Lewin, Daniel Mitchell, and Mahmood Zaido, eds. The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part II. Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press, 1997, pp. 157–196.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, Steven G. “Trade Unions, Absenteeism, and Exit-Voice.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 37 (April 1984):331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appelbaum, Eileen, Thomas Bailey, Peter Berg, and Arne L. Kalleberg. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Arvey, Richard D., Lauren M. Abraham, Thomas, J. Bouchard, and Nancy L. Segal. “Job Satisfaction: Environmental and Genetic Components.” Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (April 1989): 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barling, Julian, Clive Fullagar, and E. Kevin Kelloway. The Union and Its Members: A Psychological Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Batt, Rosemary and Eileen Appelbaum. “Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome and If So, Who Benefits?” British Journal of Industrial Relations 33 (September 1995): 353–378.Google Scholar
  9. Bender, Keith A. and Peter J. Sloane. “Job Satisfaction, Trade Unions, and Exit-Voice Revisited.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 51 (January 1998): 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, James T. and Bruce E. Kaufman. “Conclusion: The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the U.S. — Assessment and Forecast.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 395–385.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, James T. and Jason E. Taylor. “Labor Unions: Victims of Their Own Political Success?” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 245–259.Google Scholar
  12. Berger, Chris J., Craig A. Olson, and John W. Boudreau. “Effects of Unions on Job Satisfaction: The Role of Work-Related Values and Perceived Rewards.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 32 (June 1983): 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, Francine D. and Lawrence M. Kahn. “Unionism, Seniority, and Turnover.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 22 (Fall 1983): 362–373.Google Scholar
  14. Borjas, George J. “Job Satisfaction, Wages, and Unions.” Journal of Human Resources 14 (Spring 1979): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boroff, Karen E. and David Lewin. “Loyalty, Voice, and Intent to Exit a Union Firm: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 51 (October 1997): 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brett, Jeanne B. “Behavioral Research on Unions and Union-Management Systems.” In Barry Staw and Larry L. Cummings, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JA1 Press, 1980, pp. 177–214.Google Scholar
  17. Brett, Jeanne M. and Tove H. Hammer. “Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations.” In Thomas A. Kochan, Daniel J. B. Mitchell, and Lee Dyer, eds. Industrial Relations Research in the 1970s: Review and Appraisal. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1982, pp. 221–281.Google Scholar
  18. Brief, Arthur P. Attitudes in and around Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Bryson, Alex, Lorenzo Cappellari, and Laidio Lucifora. “Does Union Membership Really Reduce Job Satisfaction?” London: Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No. 569, London School of Economics, 2003.Google Scholar
  20. Carsten, Jeanne M. and Paul E. Spector. “Unemployment, Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Muchinsky Model.” Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (August 1987): 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cascio, Wayne F. Costing Human Resources. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, Susan G. and Diane E. Bailey. “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite.” Journal of Management 23 (3 1997): 219–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Costa, Paul T. and Robert R. McCrae. “Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on Subjective Well-Being: Happy and Unhappy People.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (April 1980): 668–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. — “Personality in Adulthood: A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Self-Reports and Spouse Ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (May 1988): 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cranny, C.J., Patricia C. Smith, and Eugene F. Stone. Job Satisfaction. How People Feel about Their Jobs and How It Affects Their Performance. New York: Lexington Books, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Cropanzano, Russell, Keith James, and Mary A. Konovsky. “Dispositional Affectivity as a Predictor of Work Attitudes and Job Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 14 (November 1993): 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deci, Edward L. Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  28. Ewen, Robert B. “Weighing Components of Job Satisfaction.” Journal of Applied Psychology 51 (January 1967): 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Farber, Henry S. “The Determination of the Union Status of Workers.” Econometrica 51 (September 1983): 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. — and Alan Kruger. “Union Membership in the United States: The Decline Continues.” In Bruce Kaufman and Morris Kleiner, eds. Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1993, pp. 105–134.Google Scholar
  31. Farber, Henry S. and Bruce Western. “Accounting for the Decline of Unions in the Private Sector.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector-Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 28–58.Google Scholar
  32. Fiorito, Jack. “Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for union Representation.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 205–226.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, Richard B. “Job Satisfaction as an Economic Variable.” American Economic Review 68 (May 1978): 135–141.Google Scholar
  34. — and Joel Rogers. What Workers Want. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  36. Fullagar, Clive and Julian Barling. “A Longitudinal Test of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Union Loyalty.” Journal of Applied Psychology 74 (April 1989): 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. George, Jennifer M. “Time Structure and Purpose As a Mediator of Work-Life Linkages.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21 (February 1991): 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. — “Trait and State Affect.” In Kevin R. Murphy, ed. Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 1996, pp. 145–174.Google Scholar
  39. Getman, Julius G., Stephen B. Goldberg, and Jeanne B. Herman. Union Representations Elections: Law and Reality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.Google Scholar
  40. Ghiselli, Edwin E., John P. Campbell, and Sheldon Zedeck. Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1981.Google Scholar
  41. Godard, John and John T. Delaney. “Reflections on the ‘High Performance’ Paradigm's Implications for Industrial Relations as a Field.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53 (April 2000): 482–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gordon, Michael E. and Angelo DeNisi. “A Rexamination of the Relationship Between Union Membership and Job Satisfaction.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48 (January 1995): 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gordon, Michael E. and Robert T. Ladd. “Dual Allegiance: Renewal, Reconsideration, and Recantation.” Personnel Psychology 43 (Spring 1990): 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gordon, Michael E., John W. Philpot, Robert E. Burt, Cynthia A. Thompson, and William E. Spiller. “Commitment to the Union: Development of a Measure and an Examination of Its Correlates.” Journal of Applied Psychology 65 (August 1980): 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Griffith, Roger W. and Peter W. Horn. Retaining Valued Employees. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
  46. Hackman, Richard J. and Greg R. Oldham. Work Redesign. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley, 1980.Google Scholar
  47. Hammer, Tove H. “Relationships Between Local Union Characteristics and Worker Behavior and Attitudes.” Academy of Management Journal 21 (December 1978): 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. — and Michael Berman. “The Role of Noneconomic Factors in Faculty Union Voting.” Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (August 1981): 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hammer, Tove H. and Jean F. Hartley. “Individual-Union-Organizational Relationships in a Cultural Context.” In P. Christopher Early and Miriam Erez, eds. New Perspectives on International Industrial/ Organizational Psychology. San Francisco: New Lexington Press, 1997, pp. 446–492.Google Scholar
  50. Hammer, Tove H., Jacqueline C. Landau, and Robert N. Stern. “Absenteeism When Workers Have a Voice.” Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (October 1981): 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hersch, Joni and Joe A. Stone. “Is Union Job Dissatisfaction Real?” Journal of Human Resources 25 (Autumn 1990): 736–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hirsch, Barry T. and David A. Macpherson. Union Membership and Earnings Data Book: Compilations from the Current Population Survey (2000 ed.). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 2000.Google Scholar
  53. Hirsch, Barry T. and Edward J. Schumacher. “Private Sector Union Density and the Wage Premium.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United Stales. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 92–128.Google Scholar
  54. Hirschman, Alberto O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  55. Hulin, Charles. “Adaptation, Persistence, and Commitment in Organizations.” In Marvin D. Dunnette and Laetta M. Hough, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1991, pp. 445–506.Google Scholar
  56. — Mary Roznowski and Donna Hachiya. “Alternative Opportunities and Withdrawal Decisions: Empirical and Theoretical Discrepancies and an Integration.” Psychological Bulletin 97 (March 1985): 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hunter, Larry W., John Paul MacDuffie, and Lorna Doucet. “What Makes Teams Take? Employee Reactions to Work Reforms.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55 (April 2002): 448–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. laffaldano, Michelle T. and Paul M. Muchinsky. “Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 97 (March 1985): 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Judge, Timothy A., Joyce E. Bono, Carl J. Thoresen, and Gregory K. Patton. “The Job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationship: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review.” Journal of Applied Psychology 127 (May 2001): 376–407.Google Scholar
  60. Kanfer, Ruth. “Motivation Theory and Industrial and Organizational Psychology.” In Marvin D. Dunnette and Laetta M. Hough, eds. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 1. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990, pp. 75–170.Google Scholar
  61. Kaufman, Bruce E. “What Do Unions Do: Insights from Economic Theory.” Journal of Labor Research 25 (Summer 2004): 351–382.Google Scholar
  62. Kinicki, Angelo J., Frances M. McKee-Ryan, Chester A. Schriesheim, and Kenneth P. Carson. “Assessing the Construct Validity of the Job Description Index: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (April 2002): 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kleiner, Morris M. “Intensity of Management Resistance: Understanding the Decline of Unionization in the Private Sector.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 292–316.Google Scholar
  64. Kochan, Thomas A. “On the Paradigm Guiding Industrial Relations Theory and Research.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53 (July 2000): 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. — and David E. Helfman. “The Effects of Collective Bargaining on Economic and Behavioral Job Outcomes.” In Ronald G. Ehrenberg, ed. Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981, pp. 321–365.Google Scholar
  66. Kochan, Thomas, A. and Paul Osterman. The Mutual Gains Enterprise. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  67. Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, and Robert B. McKersie. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  68. Leigh, Duane E. “Union Performance, Job Satisfaction, and the Union-Voice Hypothesis.” Industrial Relations 25 (Winter 1986): 65–71.Google Scholar
  69. Lincoln, James L. and Joan N. Boothe. “Unions and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan.” Industrial Relations 32 (Spring 1993): 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Locke, Edwin A. “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction.” In Marvin D. Dunnette, ed. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1976, pp. 1297–1349.Google Scholar
  71. Meng, Ronald. “The Relationship Between Unions and Job Satisfaction.” Applied Economics 22 (December 1990): 1635–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meyer, John P. and Natalie J. Allen. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
  73. Miller, Katherine I. and Peter R. Monge. “Participation, Satisfaction, and Productivity: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Academy of Management Journal 29 (December 1986): 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miller, Paul W. “Trade Unions and Job Satisfaction.” Australian Economic Papers 29 (December 1990): 226–248.Google Scholar
  75. — and Charles Mulvey. “Australian Evidence on the Exit-Voice Model of the Labor Market.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (October 1991): 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Motowidlo, Stephan J. “Orientation Toward the Job and Organization.” In Kevin R. Murphy, ed. Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass, 1996, pp. 175–208.Google Scholar
  77. Mowday, Richard T., Richard M. Steers, and Lyman W. Porter. “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 14 (October 1979): 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nunnally, Jum C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
  79. Osterman, Paul. “Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53 (January 2000): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pencavel, John H. “The Demand of Union Services: An Exercise.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 24 (January 1971): 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Labor Markets and Trade Unionism. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
  82. Petty, M. M., Gail W. McGee, and Jerry W. Cavender. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Individual Job Satisfaction and Individual Performance.” Academy of Management Review 9 (October 1984): 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Alison David-Blake. “Unions and Job Satisfaction: An Alternative View.” Work and Occupations 17 (August 1990): 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Polsky, Daniel. “Changing Consequences of Job Separation in the United States.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52 (July 1999): 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rees, Daniel I. “Grievance Procedure Strength and Teacher Quits.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (October 1991): 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Renaud, Stephane. “Rethinking the Union Membership/Job Satisfaction Relationship: Some Empirical Evidence in Canada.” International Journal of Manpower 23 (2 2002): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ross, Arthur M. Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  88. Rosse, Josph, G. and Terry W. Noel. “Leaving the Organization.” In Kevin R. Murphy, ed. Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996, pp. 451–506.Google Scholar
  89. Rubinstein, Saul A. and Thomas A. Kochan. Learning from Saturn. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  90. Schwochau, Susan. “Union Effects on Job Attitudes.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 (January 1987): 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith, Patricia Cain, Lorne M. Kendall, and Charles L. Hulin. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement: A Strategy for the Study of Attitudes. Chicago. IL.: Rand-McNally, 1969.Google Scholar
  92. Staw, Barry M. and Jerry Ross. “Stability in the Midst of Change: A Dispositional Approach to Job Attitudes.” Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (August 1985): 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tellegen, Auke. “Structures of Mood and Personality and Their Relevance to Assessing Anxiety, with an Emphasis on Self-Report.” In A.H. Tumas and J.D. Masters, eds. Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1985, pp. 681–709.Google Scholar
  94. — David T. Lykken, Thomas J. Bouchard, Kimberly J. Wilcox, Nancy L. Segal, and Stephen Rich. “Personality Similarity in Twins Reared Apart and Together.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (June 1988): 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Thieblot, Armand J. “The Fall and Future of Unionism in Construction.” In James T. Bennett and Bruce E. Kaufman, eds. The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002, pp. 149–171.Google Scholar
  96. Triandis, Harry C. Individualism and Collectivism. San Francisco: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  97. Vroom, Victor H. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
  98. Wagner III, John A. “Participation's Effects on Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration of Research Evidence.” Academy of Management Review 19 (April 1994): 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weiss, D. J., R. W. Dawis, G. W. England, and L. H. Lofquist. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis: Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, 1967.Google Scholar
  100. Zalesny, Mary D. “Comparison of Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Predicting Faculty Union Vote Preferences in a Union Representation Election.” Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (May 1985): 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tove Helland Hammer
  • Ariel Avgar
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthaca

Personalised recommendations