The effects of prevailing wage laws: A comparison of individual workers’ wages earned on and off prevailing wage construction projects

Abstract

I evaluate the effects of prevailing wage laws using a unique data set that shows the wages paid to workers on prevailing wage projects and the wages paid to the same workers during the same time period for work on projects not covered by prevailing wage regulations. The wage comparison shows that workers are generally paid more for work on prevailing wage projects than they are for work on nonprevailing wage projects. Thus, prevailing wage laws likely do increase the cost of public construction. In addition, to the extent that the quality of construction is improved, prevailing wage laws appear to be an inefficient mechanism by which to achieve additional quality, as the regulations often result in workers being paid more than they earn in the private market.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Allen, Steven G. “Much Ado About Davis-Bacon: A Critical Review and New Evidence.” Journal of Law and Economics 26 (October 1983): 707–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. —. “Unionized Construction Workers Are More Productive.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (May 1984): 251–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. —. “Can Union Labor Ever Cost Less?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (May 1987): 347–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azari-Rad, Hamid, Peter Philips, and Mark Prus. “Making Hay When It Rains: The Effect Prevailing Wage Regulations, Scale Economies, Seasonal, Cyclical, and Local Business Patterns Have on School Construction Costs.” Journal of Education Finance 27 (Spring 2002): 997–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. “State Prevailing Wage Laws and School Construction Costs.” Industrial Relations 42 (July 2003): 445–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilginsoy, Cihan, and Peter Philips. “Prevailing Wage Regulations and School Construction Costs: Evidence from British Columbia.” Journal of Education Finance 24 (Winter 2000): 415–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fraundorf, Martha Norby, John P. Farrell, and Robert Mason. “The Effect of the Davis-Bacon Act on Construction Costs in Rural Areas.” Review of Economics and Statistics 66 (February 1983): 142–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldfarb, Robert S. and John F. Morrall III. “The Davis-Bacon Act: An Appraisal of Recent Studies.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 34 (January 1981): 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould, John P. and George Bittlingmayer. The Economics of the Davis-Bacon Act: An Analysis of Prevailing Wage Laws. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kessler, Daniel P. and Lawrence F. Katz. “Prevailing Wage Laws and Construction Labor Markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54 (January 2001): 259–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Metzger, Michael R. and Robert S. Goldfarb. “Do Davis-Bacon Minimum Wages Raise Product Quality?” Journal of Labor Research 4 (Summer 1983): 265–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson, Richard R. “State Labor Legislation Enacted in 1997.” Monthly Labor Review 121 (January 1998): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —. “State Labor Legislation Enacted in 1999.” Monthly Labor Review 123 (January 2000): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —. “State Labor Legislation Enacted in 2000.” Monthly Labor Review 124 (January 2001): 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. —. “State Labor Legislation Enacted in 2001.” Monthly Labor Review 125 (January 2002): 12–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connell, John F. “The Effects of Davis-Bacon on Labor Cost and Union Wages.” Journal of Labor Research 1 (Summer 1986): 239–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen, Jeffrey S. “Health Care and Pension Benefits for Construction Workers: The Role of Prevailing Wage Laws.” Industrial Relations 39 (April 2000): 246–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Philips, Peter. “Kentucky’s Prevailing Wage Law: Its History, Purpose, and Effect.” Unpublished paper, October 1999, University of Utah.

  19. -. “A Comparison of Public School Construction Costs in Three Midwestern States That Have Changed Their Prevailing Wage Laws in the 1990s, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan.” Unpublished paper, February 2001, University of Utah.

  20. Prus, Mark J. “Prevailing Wage Laws and School Construction Costs: An Analysis of Public School Construction in Maryland and the Mid-Atlantic States.” Unpublished paper, January 1999, State University of New York at Cortland.

  21. Thieblot, Armand J. The Davis-Bacon Act. Labor Relations and Public Policy Series, Report No 10. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  22. -. State Prevailing Wage Laws: An Assessment at the Start of 1995. Unpublished paper, January 1995.

  23. —. “A New Evaluation of Impacts of Prevailing Wage Law Repeal.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (1996): 297–322.

    Google Scholar 

  24. U.S. General Accounting Office/HRD-79-18. “The Davis-Bacon Act Should be Repealed.” Washington, DC: GAO, April 27, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson, Ginny, Mike Clark, Greg Hager, Cindy Upton, Betty Davis, Barry Boardman, and Tom Hewlett. “An Analysis of Kentucky’s Prevailing Wage Laws and Procedures.” Kentucky Legislative Research Commission, Research Report No. 304, December 2001.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was done originally for the Program Review and Investigations Committee of the Kentucky State Legislature. I thank the staff of the Program Review and Investigations Committee and the Legisla-tive Research Commission for assistance with data collection and Mark Berger for helpful comments. Due to confidentiality requirements, the data cannot be made available.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, M. The effects of prevailing wage laws: A comparison of individual workers’ wages earned on and off prevailing wage construction projects. J Labor Res 26, 725–737 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-005-1008-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Construction Cost
  • Union Wage
  • Fringe Benefit
  • Wage Cost
  • Wage Data