Skip to main content
Log in

A theory of union collective action

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between government behaviors and union collective action has been a neglected research area. Where unions are not heavily involved in policymaking, as long as governments respect the status quo and do not undermine unions’ vested interests in organizational and job security, unions are not likely to break with their past institutionalized behaviors. But what happens when a government promulgates policies that threaten the unions’ vested interests and simultaneously excludes them from the political decisionmaking system? The politically excluded unions’ arsenal of responses ranges from a passive, waitandsee behavior to collective protests. Understanding the process of the latter response is my focus herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Roy J. “Implications of the International Human Rights Consensus for Canadian Labour and Management.” Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal 9 (2002): 119–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Health. Health Workforce in Alberta. Edmonton, AB, Canada: AH, 1994 and 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Personnel Administration Office. Public Service Commissioner's Annual Report: Profile of the Alberta Public Service. Edmonton, AB, Canada: APHA, 1995, 1996, and 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John C. and John Thomas Delaney. “The Involvement of Canadian Unions in Political Activities: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Labor Research 11 (Fall 1990): 361–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byfield, Link. “Apart From Gambling and Balanced Budget, What Exactly Does Ralph Klein Believe In?” Alberta Report, March 23, 1998.

  • Cappelli, Peter. “Theory Construction in IR and Some Implications for Research.” Industrial Relations 24 (Winter 1985): 90–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Timothy D. and Rafael Gely. “Toward Identifying the Determinants of Public-Employee Unions' Involvement in Political Activities.” American Review of Public Administration 26 (December 1996): 417–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. and Selwyn W. Becker. Innovation in Organizations. New York: Elsevier North Holland, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, Rand. Provincial Politics in Canada: Toward the Turn of the Century. Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice Hall, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard and Michael Podgursky. “The Unraveling Accord: American Unions in Crisis.” In Richard Edwards, Paolo Garonna, and Franz Tödtling, eds. Unions in Crisis and Beyond: Perspectives from Six Countries. Dover, Mass.: Auburn House: 1986, pp. 14–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Carola M. “Union Membership in Post-Socialist East Germany: Who Participates in Collective Action?” British Journal of Industrial Relations 34 (September 1996): 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxie, Robert Franklin. Trade Unions in the United States. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbitson, John. Promised Land: Inside the Mike Harris Revolution. Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice Hall, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrude, Larry. “Why Women Are Less In-Kleined to Vote for Ralph.” Edmonton Journal, February 2, 1997.

  • Klandermans, Bert. “Psychology and Trade Union Participation: Joining, Acting, Quitting.” Journal of Occupational Psychology 59 (3 1986): 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological; Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory.” American Sociological Review 49 (October 1984): 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, Sarosh, Daniel G. Gallagher, Jack Fiorito, and Mitsuru Wakabayashi. “Union Participation in Japan: Do Western Theories Apply?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (April 1990): 374–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin, Martin Trow, and James Coleman. Union Democracy: The Inside Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, Melville L. Leading The Way or Missing The Mark? The Klein Government's Fiscal Plan. Western Centre for Economic Research. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, David S. and Sidney Tarrow. “A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century.” In David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow, eds. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Alan I. and Yonatan Reshef. “American Manufacturing Unions' Stasis: A Paradigmatic Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 13 (October 1988): 639–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforuk, Andrew. “Mister Dress-Up.” National Post Business, December, 2002.

  • Pizzorno, Alessandro. “Political Exchange and Collective Identity in Industrial Conflict.” In Colin Crouch and Alessandro Pizzorno, eds. The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968. London: Macmillan, 1978, Vol. 2, pp. 277–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, David. No Justice, No Peace: The 1996 OPSEU Strike Against the Harris Government in Ontario. Ottawa, Ont.: McGill-Queen's University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reshef, Yonatan and Sandra Rastin. Unions in the Time of Revolution: Government Restructuring in Alberta and Ontario. Ont.: University of Toronto Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reshef, Yonatan. “The Logic of Labor Quiescence.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Summer 2001): 635–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Political Exchange in Israel: Histadrut-State Relations.” Industrial Relations 25 (Fall 1986): 303–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Joseph B. “The Assault on School Teacher Bargaining in Ontario.” Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 57 (Winter 2002): 100–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “From Softball to Hardball: The Transition in Labour-Management Relations in the Ontario Public Service.” In Gene Swimmer, ed. Public-Sector Labour Relations in an Era of Restraint and Restructuring. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. Industrial Relations in Ontario. Working paper. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1998.

  • Shepard, Herbert A. “Innovation-Resisting and Innovation-Producing Organizations.” Journal of Business 40 (October 1967): 470–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, Edward and Charles Tilly. Strikes in France, 1830-1968. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A. and Robert D. Benford. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1 (1988): 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swimmer, Gene. “Public-Sector Labour Relations in an Era of Restraint and Restructuring: An Overview.” In Gene Swimmer, ed. Public-Sector Labour Relations in an Era of Restraint and Restructuring. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University, 2001 Press, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reshef, Y. A theory of union collective action. J Labor Res 25, 623–644 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-004-1014-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-004-1014-9

Keywords

Navigation