Abstract
Minorities and females are underrepresented in the top-income quintile of law school graduates. Employing a binary logistic regression model, I examine whether this is due to a“glass ceiling” (an invisible barrier erected by third parties) or a“sticky floor” (self-imposed limitations regarding employment). My major finding is that being female, a minority, or disabled did not significantly reduce one's probability of making the top-income quintile once hours of work, experience, and other factors are taken into account. My findings directly contradict the large body of glass-ceiling literature and support the sticky-floor model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel, Marina. “The Glass Ceiling for Women in Legal Education: Contract Positions and the Death of Tenure.” Journal of Legal Education 50 (March 2000): 1–15.
Baker, Joe G. “The Influx of Women in the Legal Professions: An Economic Analysis.” Monthly Labor Review 125 (August 2002): 14–24.
— and Brian Jorgensen. “Leaving the Law. Occupational and Career Mobility of Law School Grad-uates.” Journal of Legal Education 50 (March 2000): 16–35.
Becker, Gary S. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” Original 1965, reprinted in Consumer Theory. Chel-tenham, U.K.: Elgar Reference Collection, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 100 (1998): 251–75.
Curran, Barbara A. and Clara N. Carson. The Lawyer Statistical Report, The U.S. Legal Profession in the 1990s. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1994.
Ehrenberg, Ronald G. “Academic Labor Supply.” In Charles T. Clotfelter, Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Malcolm Getz, and John J. Siegfried. Challenges in Higher Education. Chicago Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 141–258.
-. “An Economic Analysis of the Market for Law School Students.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 2602 (1988).
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, Robert Saute, Bonnie Oglensky, and Martha Gever. “Report-Glass Ceilings and Open Doors: Women's Advancement in the Legal Profession: A Report to the Committee on Women in the Profession.” Fordham Law Review 64 (November 1995): 291–449.
Foster, S. Elizabeth. “The Glass Ceiling in the Legal Profession: Why Do Law Firms Still Have So Few Female Partners?” UCLA Law Review 42 (August 1995): 1631–89.
Goddeeris, John H. “Compensating Differentials and Self Selection: An Application to Lawyers.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (April 1988): 411–28.
Huang,Wynn R. “Gender Differences in the Earnings of Lawyers.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 30 (Winter 1997): 267–325.
Kay, Fiona M. and John Hagan. “The Persistent Glass Ceiling: Gendered Inequalities in the Earnings of Lawyers.” British Journal of Sociology 46 (June 1995): 279–310.
Kende, Mark S. “Shattering the Glass Ceiling: A Legal Theory for Attacking Discrimination against Women Partners.” Hastings Law Journal 46 (November 1994): 17–83.
Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Richard L. Revesz. “Legal Education and Entry into the Legal Profession: The Role of Race, Gender, and Educational Debt.” New York University Law Review 70 (October 1995): 829–964.
Mincer, Jacob. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1974.
Nelson, Robert L. “The Futures of American Lawyers: A Demographic Profile of a Changing Profession in a Changing Society.” Case Western Law Review 345 (Winter 1994): 378–405.
Rosen, Sherwin. “The Market for Lawyers.” Journal of Law and Economics 35 (October 1992): 215–6.
Sander, Richard H. and E. Douglass Williams. “Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspectives on a Turbulent Market.” Law and Social Inquiry 14 (Spring 1989): 431–79.
Wallace, Shelly. “Has the Glass Ceiling Been Replaced by the Sticky Floor?” American Lawyer's Corpo-rate Counsel Magazine 2 (February 1995): 85–86.
Weisbrod, Burton A. “Nonprofit and Proprietary Sector Behavior: Wage Differentials among Lawyers.” Jour-nal of Labor Economics 3 (July 1983): 246–62.
Wood, Robert G., Mary E. Corcoran, and Paul N. Courant. “Pay Differences among the Highly Paid: The Male-Female Earnings Gap in Lawyers Salaries.” Journal of Labor Economics 11 (July 1993): 417–41.
Ziewacz, Elizabeth K. “Can the Glass Ceiling Be Shattered? The Decline of Women Partners in Large Law Firms.” Ohio State Law Journal 57 (Fall 1997): 946–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank the Law School Admission Council for funding this research. Helpful comments and suggestions were received from Robert Nelson of Northwestern University and the American Bar Foundation, Steven Conroy of the University of West Florida, and R. Kim Craft and Douglas Bonzo of Southern Utah University. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions or persons listed above.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, J.G. Glass ceilings or sticky floors? A model of high-income law graduates. J Labor Res 24, 695–711 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-003-1021-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-003-1021-2