Local union leaders’ satisfaction with grievance procedures
- 129 Downloads
We develop a model of local union leaders’ satisfaction with their grievance proce-dures drawing from the job characteristics model and agency theory. The model is tested with OLS regression and LISREL estimates based on a survey of local union leaders in British Columbia. Results show that local union leaders are more satisfied with their grievance procedures when local officials have more autonomy in decision making; their local size is smaller; the grievance filing rate is low; grievance issues are perceived as important; the grievance resolution rate is high; a greater propor-tion of grievances are settled in the early steps; and the union success rate is high. In addition, grievance procedure satisfaction is multifaceted and each facet has its own unique variance and a different combination of significant predictors.
KeywordsUnion Member Agency Theory Local Leader Labor Relation Review Union Official
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Catlett, Judith L. and Edwin L. Brown. “Union Leaders' Perceptions of the Grievance Process.” Labor Studies Journal 51 (Spring 1990): 54–65.Google Scholar
- —. “Professional Staff in American Unions: Changes, Trends, Implications.” Journal of Labor Research 13 (Fall 1992): 381–92.Google Scholar
- - and Daniel Gallagher. “Membership Perceptions of the Value and Effect of Grievance Procedures.” Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (1988): 406–14.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. R. and Greg R. Oldham. Work Redesign. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1980.Google Scholar
- Joreskog, K.G. and D. Sorbom. LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. 4th ed. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software, 1986.Google Scholar
- —. “The Role of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Grievance Decisions.” Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 42 (Autumn 1987b): 716–33.Google Scholar
- Lewin, David and Richard B. Peterson. The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States. New York: Quorum Books, 1988.Google Scholar
- McGuire, Robert A. and Robert L. Ohsfeldt. “Self-interest, Agency Theory, and Political Voting Behavior: The Ratification of the United States Constitution.” American Economic Review 79 (March 1989): 219–34.Google Scholar
- Ponak, Allen and Corliss Olson. “Time Delays in Grievance Arbitration.” Industrial Relations 47 (Autumn 1992): 690–705.Google Scholar