Skip to main content
Log in

The robustness of OSHA ergonomics benefits: A note

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Black, Duncan. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learner, Edward E. “Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics. American Economic Review 73 (March 1983): 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David M. “The Partial Spectator in the Wealth of Nations: A Robust Utilitarianism. European Jour- nal of the History of Economic Thought 2 (Autumn 1995): 299–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. The Economic Ideas of Ordinary People: From Preferences to Trade. New York: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “29 CFR 1910, Ergonomics Program: Proposed Rule. Fed- eral Register 64 (November 23, 1999): 65767-66078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Barbara S. and Stover H. Snook. “The Cost of Compensate Upper Extremity Cumulative Trauma Disorders. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 36 (July 1994): 713–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cochran, J. The robustness of OSHA ergonomics benefits: A note. J Labor Res 22, 111–115 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1006-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-001-1006-y

Keywords

Navigation