Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taking a Test Drive?: Implicit Theories Sexual Compatibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Implicit Theories of Relationships address assumptions about the nature of romantic relationships, whether they are destined to succeed or grow over time through effort. Other implicit theories target certain aspects of sexuality. Implicit Theories of Sexual Compatibility (ITSC) is a proposed application of implicit theories that addresses assumptions about sexual compatibility, whether it is fixed or malleable. The current study investigated characteristics and circumstances that might help explain why individuals differ in their ITSC. A study of 1,443 young adults’ questionnaire data revealed that the ITSC items represented two distinct dimensions, namely a fixed and malleable theory. Bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed a variety of background characteristics, sexuality variables, and love/relationship beliefs associated with endorsements of the ITSC, especially the fixed perspective. For example, a fixed perspective especially was associated with being female, having had more extensive intercourse experience, a higher score on a casual sex scale, romantic beliefs, and believing couples should cohabit before marriage to learn what they are getting into.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohns, V. K., Scholer, A. A., & Rehman, U. (2015). Implicit theories of attraction. Social Cognition, 33(4), 284–307.

  • Busby, D. M., Carroll, J. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2010). Compatibility or restraint? The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 766–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, D. M., Spencer, S., Butler, M. H., & Anderson, S. R. (2023). Sexual beliefs in couple relationships: Exploring the pathways of mindfulness, communication, and sexual functioning on sexual passion and satisfaction. Family Process, e12917.

  • Chen, W. W., & Wu, C. W. (2023). The potential origins and consequences of Chinese youths’ faith in love: Filial piety, implicit theories of romantic relationships, and intimacy. Journal of Family Studies, 29(2), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.1944276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.-W., & Wu, C.-W. (2023). The potential origins and consequences of Chinese youths’ faith in love: Filial piety, implicit theories of romantic relationships, and intimacy. Journal of Family Studies, 29(2), 543–554.https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.1944276

  • Chen, Z., DeWall, C. N., Poon, K. T., & Chen, E. W. (2012). When destiny hurts: Implicit theories of relationships moderate aggressive responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., Hong,Y., & Chiu, C. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 644–656.

  • Emmers-Sommer, T. (2014). Adversarial sexual attitudes toward women: The relationships with gender and traditionalism. Sexuality & Culture, 18(4), 804–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9222-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S. (2012a). Implicit theories of the marital institution: Associations and moderation. Family Science Review, 17, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S. (2012b). Implicit theories of the marital institution. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S., & Knox, D. (2013). A profile of double victims: Sexual coercion by a dating partner and a stranger. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.743940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S., Knox, D., & Shapiro, K. (2017). I have, I would, I won’t: Hooking up among sexually diverse groups of college students. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, C., Desmarias, S., & Hennig, K. (2007). Characteristics of male and female victims of sexual coercion. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Implicit theories of intelligence: Reconsidering the role of confidence in achievement motivation (pp. 197–216). In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York: Plenum

  • Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, J. M., Graf, N., & Livingston, G. (2019, November 6). Marriage and cohabitation in the U.S. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/11/06/marriage-and-cohabitation-in-the-u-s/.

  • Knee, C. R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 360.

  • Knee, C. R., & Petty, K. N. (2013). Implicit theories of relationships: Destiny and growth beliefs. In J. A. Simpson, & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0009.

  • Knee, C. R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N. A., Neighbors, C., & Patrick, H. (2001). Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277004

  • Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55

  • Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., Nanayakkara, A., & Neighbors, C. (2002). Self-determination as growth motivation in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 609–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. H., & Lamont, C. (2005). The relationship of childhood sexual abuse to the marital attitudes and readiness for marriage of single young adult women. Journal of Family Issues, 26(4), 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, E. W., & Mccoy, J. (2011). Perpetration of sexual coercion and victim of sexual coercions scales: Development and validation. Psychological Reports, 108, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, B. A., McIntyre, K. P., Knee, C. R., & Loving, T. J. (2019). Implicit theories of relationships and self-expansion: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518768079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A., Muise, A., MacDonald, G., Day, L. C., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(2), 238.

  • Miles, N. J., & Servaty-Seib, H. L. (2010). Parental marital status and young adult offspring’s attitudes about marriage and divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(4), 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Good, giving, and game: The relationship benefits of communal sexual responsiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614553641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekoolaltak, M., Keshavarz, Z., Simbar, M., Nazari, A. M., & Baghestani, A. R. (2020). Sexual compatibility with spouse questionnaire: Development and psychometric property evaluation. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 8(3), 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell, R. J., Hugenberg, K., Ray, D., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Séguin, L. J., & Blais, M. (2021). The development and validation of the orgasm beliefs inventory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(6), 2543–2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01911-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01542219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. E., Capesius, D., Kulibert, D., & Doyle, R. A. (2020). Understanding infidelity forgiveness: An application of implicit theories of relationships. Journal of Relationships Research, 11, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G., Pelts, M., Frabotta, R., & Paceley, M. S. (2023). They were the best and the worst of times: Reflections illuminate emerging adults’ sexual experiences. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC: SR & SP. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00865-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., Hall, S. S., & Goff, S. (2015). Marriage matters but how much? Marital centrality among young adults. The Journal of Psychology, 149, 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.979128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D. (2010). The sex Fantasy Questionnaire: An update. Sexual and Relationship Therapy: Journal of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(1), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990903505799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by all authors and analysis were conducted by Scott Hall. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Scott Hall and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the East Carolina University & Medical Center Institutional Review Board (1/3/22, #15-001062) and the Ball State University Institutional Review Board (12/16/21, #1849385-1).

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Early Childhood, Youth, and Family Studies TC 605, Ball State University, 47306, Muncie, IN, USA

    Scott S. Hall

  2. Department of Sociology Brewster 419A, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA

    David Knox

Authors
  1. Scott S. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Knox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott S. Hall.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Statements and Declarations

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, S.S., Knox, D. Taking a Test Drive?: Implicit Theories Sexual Compatibility. Sexuality & Culture (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10214-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10214-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation