Abstract
Sexting involves the sharing of sexually explicit material, including photos and text-based messages, with another person via smartphones and computers. This study investigated how perceived affordances of various channels used in sexting related to outcomes from sexting. A sample of 174 U.S. adults completed a survey about their sexting behaviors and outcomes, including self-esteem and sexual gratification. Most adults engaged in sexting via text-based messaging, though they also reported using photo messaging, Snapchat, and video messaging. Results reveal differences in perceived affordances based on one’s most recently used channel to sext; differences in perceived affordances related to self-esteem outcomes and sexual outcomes, including orgasm; and differences in one’s level of uncertainty about sexting with a partner based on channel affordances. Perceived social presence of a channel related to increases in self-esteem and sexual gratification, whereas perceived editability of a channel related to a greater sense of control over one’s sexual materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., & Chirumbolo, A. (2021). Individual differences and developmental trends in sexting motivations. Current Psychology, 40, 4231–4540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00398-4.
Courtice, E. L., & Shaughnessy, K. (2017). Technology-mediated sexual interaction and relationships: A systematic review of the literature. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 3–4(32), 269 – 220. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1397948.
Courtice, E. L., & Shaughnessy, K. (2021). Four problems in sexting research and their solutions. Sexes, 2(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes2040033.
Currin, J. M., Evans, A. E., & Garos, S. (2020). In a relationship, who tends to sext first? Sexual and Relationship Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2020.1845312.
Dir, A. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2015). Risks, risk factors, and outcomes associated with phone and internet sexting among university students in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0370-7.
Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
Döring, N., & Mohseni, M. R. (2019). Are online sexual activities and sexting good for adults’ sexual well-being? Results from a national online survey. International Journal of Sexual Health, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2018.1491921.
Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students’ romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.015.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Routledge.
Hasinoff, A. A. (2017). Sexting and privacy violations: A case study of sympathy and blame. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1037391.
Hasinoff, A. A., & Shepherd, T. (2014). Sexting in context: Privacy norms and expectations. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2932 – 2415. https://doi.org/1932– 8036/20140005.
Holt, K. M., Holt, T. J., Cale, J., Brewer, R., & Goldsmith, A. (2021). Assessing the role of self-control and technology access on adolescent sexting and sext dissemination. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106952.
Jaynes, V. (2019). The social life of screenshots: The power of visibility in teen friendship groups. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1378–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819878806.
Jung, S., Roh, S., Yang, H., & Biocca, F. (2017). Location and modality effects in online dating: Rich modality profile and location-based information cues increase social presence, while moderating the impact of uncertainty reduction strategy. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 20(9), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0027.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007.
McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied? Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 18(11), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0334.
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, C., & Madigan, S. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4.
Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2019). The nature and extent of sexting among a national sample of middle and high school students in the U.S. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2333–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1449-y.
Snap (2022). Introducing memories. Snapchat Newsroom Retrieved from https://newsroom.snap.com/en-US/memories.
Thomas, M. F., Binder, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Love in the time of corona: Predicting willingness to engage in sexting during the first COVID-19-related lockdown. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02292-w.
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865.
Van Ouytsel, J., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2020). Sexting within young adults’ dating and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007.
Vendemia, M. A., & Coduto, K. D. (2022). Online daters’ sexually explicit media consumption and imagined interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106981.
Walrave, M., Van Ouystel, J., Poonet, K., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Sharing and caring?: The role of social media and privacy in sexting behaviour. In M. Walrave, Van J. Ouystel, K. Ponnet, & J. R. Temple (Eds.), Sexting: Motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.
Walther, J. B. (2013). Affordances, effects, and technology errors. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (38 vol., pp. 190–193). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no competing interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Coduto, K.D. Channel Affordances for Sexting: Social Presence Relates to Improved Self-Esteem, Sexual Gratification, and Sexting Certainty. Sexuality & Culture 28, 228–242 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10112-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10112-z