Skip to main content
Log in

Two Different Narratives of Hijab in Iran: Burqa and Niqab

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Burqa and niqab are currently the two most challenging manifestations of face veil in the West. Developed based on an interpretive method, the present research is an attempt to study and analyze semantic implications of face veil among 24 Muslim Iranian women in Baluchestan Province and Qeshm Island in Iran. Semi-structured interviews and field observations were employed. The findings indicated that the connotation of niqab for the ethnic-religious minority women in Baluchestan was different from that of burqa for the religious minority women living on Qeshm Island. The Baluch women wear niqab as a sign of their collective identity and differentiation as well as maximal religious commitment vis-à-vis Shia-Persian majority; whereas burqa more than representing religious or ethnic identity, is an expressive language for native women to differentiate their personal identity. Burqa, produced in different colors and forms, is rich enough to show the marital status, social class, economic wellbeing and the age of women wearing it in a traditional patriarchal society; whereas all-black niqab prevents the identification and differentiation of the users. Burqa and niqab trade in both regions under study has led to the women-only employment in its manufacturing market, sewing and sales, although applying gold threads on some brands of burqa has turned them into capital goods, playing a more decisive role in socio-economic empowerment of women in Qeshm. Given the findings of this study, it may be concluded that various types of face veils in the world of Islam represent certain signs and symbols within ethnic-religious structures that need further deliberation before enactment of any law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the Hanbali and Shafi’i schools which are more conservative, covering entire body and face are required (Slininger 2014).

  2. Hanafi juristic school of thought considers the niqab as mustahab (recommended). Among Maliki and Shafi’i schools it is mandatory while Hanbali school considers it fard (obligatory) (Denny 2016).

References

  • Abdel-Mageed, D. (2008). The multiple shades of the hijab. Retrieved September, 19, 2008.

  • Afshar, H. (2008). Can I see your hair? Choice, agency and attitudes: The dilemma of faith and feminism for Muslim women who cover. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(2), 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, L. (2011). Veil of ignorance. Foreign Policy, 186, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hejin, B. (2015). Covering Muslim women: Semantic macrostructures in BBC news. Discourse & Communication, 9(1), 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mahadin, S. (2013). The social semiotics of hijab: Negotiating the body politics of veiled women. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 6(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, S. (2014). From the oppressed to the terrorist: American muslim women caught in the crosshairs of intersectionality. Terrorism and the Muslim veil. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Available at http://papers.ssrn.co/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981777.

  • Ballard, R., Ferrari, A., Grillo, R., Hoekema, A. J., Maussen, M., & Shah, P. (2016). Cultural diversity: Challenge and accommodation. In R. Grillo, et al. (Eds.), Legal practice and cultural diversity (pp. 23–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, J. P., & Read, J. N. G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender, power, and identity among evangelical and Muslim women in the United States. Qualitative sociology, 26(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, S. (2010). Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(1), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng, M. D. (2010). Symbolically Muslim: Media, hijab, and the West. Critical Sociology, 36(1), 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle, R. (2004). Hijab and the limits of French secular republicanism. Society, 41(6), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, P. (2010). Ban the Burqa?. Middle East Quarterly: The argument in favor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, N. A., Bakar, H. S. A., & Elmetwally, A. A. (2017). Probing Niqab wearing as an islamic identity, cultural piety and women’s empowerment: A phenomenological approach. International Journal of Ethics in Social Sciences, 5(1), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (2013). Women in niqab speak: A study of the niqab in Canada. Gananoque: Canadian Council of Muslim Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, K. (2012). Quebec’s Bill 94: What’s “reasonable”? What’s “accommodation”? And what’s the meaning of the Muslim Veil? American Review of Canadian Studies, 42(2), 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, F. (2016). Introduction to Islam. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droogsma, R. A. (2007). Redefining Hijab: American Muslim women’s standpoints on veiling. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(3), 294–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, A. (2010). Deconstructing Euro-centric myths about muslim women (pp. 77–101). Critical global perspectives: Rethinking knowledge about global societies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriot, P. (2008). Religious fundamentalism: Global, local and personal. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A., & Markle, G. (2004). From struggles for recognition to a plural concept of justice: An interview with Axel Honneth. Acta Sociologica, 47, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leet-Otley, J. (2019). (Mis) understanding the Hijab: The spirit and strength of Somali girls. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 14, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R., & Mills, S. (2003). Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2011). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. I. (2005). Fashion and democratic relationships. Polity, 37(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2002). Islamic feminism and its discontents: Toward a resolution of the debate. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(4), 1135–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2003). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, N., & Rastegar, Y. (2018). The social and cultural construction of Burqa: The case of Gheshm Island in Iran. Sexuality and Culture, 22(3), 962–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najmabadi, A. (2005). Islamic feminism or feminist challenges to Islam. Women and Islam: Womens’s movements in Muslim societies, 3(3), 216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, L. (2017). Hijab (istas)—as fashion phenomenon. A Review. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis, 7(1), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piela, A. (2019). Wearing the Niqab in the UK: Exploring the embodied “shape a moral action can take”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 87(2), 512–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottmann, S. B., & Ferree, M. M. (2008). Citizenship and intersectionality: German feminist debates about headscarf and antidiscrimination laws. Social Politics, 15(4), 481–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayyid, S., & Vakil, A. (2010). Thinking through islamophobia: Global perspectives. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slininger, S. (2014). Veiled omen: Hijab, religion, and cultural practice. Historia, 23, 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajudin, B. D. B. A., Yen, T. S., & Lee, G. P. (2019). Hijab styling is it fashion or modesty? Its’ portrayal in three popular Hijab brands in Malaysia. Journal of Modern Trends in Business Research (IJMTBR), 2(7), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlo, E. (2007). Hijab in London: Metamorphosis, resonance and effects. Journal of Material Culture, 12(2), 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tristam, P. (2013). Niqab. Taylor′s University Press.

  • Van Manen, M. (2016). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadud, A. (2007). Insight the gender Jihad: Women’s reform in Islam. Oxford: One World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. S. (2012). The veil and Muslim women’s identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 521–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waninger, K. (2015). The veiled identity: Hijabistas, instagram and branding in the online Islamic fashion industry. Ph.D Thesis, Georgia State University. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/wsi_theses/48.

  • Williams, R. H., & Vashi, G. (2007). Hijab and American Muslim women: Creating the space for autonomous selves. Sociology of religion, 68(3), 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, A. K., & Smith, M. N. (2005). Critical race feminism lifts the veil: Muslim women, France, and the headscarf ban. UC Davis L. Rev., 39, 743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T. (2015). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters. Toronto: Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yegenoglu, M. (2006). The return of the religious: Revisiting Europe and its Islamic others. Culture and religion, 7(3), 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yotka, S. (2016). Dolce & Gabbana’s embellished Hijabs and Abayas are great news for Muslim Women-when will other brands follow suit? Vogue. http://www.vogue.com/article/dolce-gabbana-hijab-abaya-collection.

  • Zempi, I. (2016). ‘It’s a part of me, I feel naked without it’: Choice, agency and identity for Muslim women who wear the niqab. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(10), 1738–1754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zempi, I. (2019). Veiled Muslim women’s views on law banning the wearing of the niqab (face veil) in public. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(15), 2585–2602.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naima Mohammadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, N., Hazeri, A.M. Two Different Narratives of Hijab in Iran: Burqa and Niqab. Sexuality & Culture 25, 680–699 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09789-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09789-3

Keywords

Navigation