Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tackling Prejudice and Discrimination Towards Families with Same-Sex Parents: An Exploratory Study in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though studies have shown that the sexual orientation of parents does not influence their parenting skills or the well-being of their children, prejudice against same-sex families is still very widespread. Research has not sufficiently explored the ways in which parents tackle this prejudice. Using qualitative methodologies, in particular textual analyses, this study has analysed the discourse used by same-sex families to handle the prejudices that they face. The results highlighted that conflicts, which may even be ideological in nature, are sometimes created between traditional families and “atypical” families. These often result in estrangement and isolation from their own family and the communities to which they belong, in turn damaging the growth of the children involved. Furthermore, means for moving beyond conflict, sharing experiences and effectively tackling prejudices are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. PACS refers to a Civil Solidarity Pact, which was introduced in France in 1999; this is a contract for two people of any gender, which aims to formalise their life together. It protects couples in terms of rental relationships and tax matters, but does not regulate other areas, such as inheritance, parentage and adoption (Gentili 2013). With the approval of the law regarding civil unions in Italy, which remains a separate legal institution to marriage, all of the rights and duties of the latter are recognised and guaranteed, including those relating to matters of adoption.

References

  • Adams, J., & Light, R. (2015). Scientific consensus, the law, and same sex parenting outcomes. Social Science Research, 53, 300–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anolli, L. (Ed.). (2008). Fondamenti di psicologia della comunicazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocco, R., Santamaria, F., Ioverno, S., Petracca, C., Biondi, P., Laghi, F., et al. (2013). Famiglie composte da genitori gay e lesbiche e famiglie composte da genitori eterosessuali: benessere dei bambini, impegno nella relazione e soddisfazione diadica. Infanzia e adolescenza, 12(2), 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastianoni, P., Baiamonte, C., & De Palo, F. (2015). Cogenitorialità e relazioni triadiche nelle famiglie omogenitoriali: una ricerca italiana. Le famiglie omogenitoriali in Italia. Relazioni familiari e diritti dei figli. Bergamo: Edizioni Junior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco, S. (1999). Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, H. M. V. (2004). Family characteristics, child rearing and child adjustment in planned lesbian families. Dissertation “Parenting in Planned Lesbian Families”, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences.

  • Capozzi, P., & Lingiardi, V. (2003). Happy Italy? The Mediterranean experience of homosexuality, psychoanalysis, and the mental health professions. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 7(1/2), 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (Ed.). (2002). Rethinking human rights: Critical approaches to international politics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, M. (1998). The power of the word: Some post-structural considerations of qualitative approaches in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutcliffe, J. R. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1476–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Orto, G. (1990). Mediterranean homosexuality. In W. R. Dynes (Ed.), Encyclopedia of homosexuality (Vol. II). New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amore, S., Simonelli, A., & Miscioscia, M. (2013). La qualità delle interazioni triadiche nelle famiglie lesbogenitoriali: uno studio pilota con la procedura del Lausanne Trilogue Play. Infanzia e adolescenza, 12(2), 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danna, D. (2009). Madri lesbiche in Italia: il mito della discriminazione. In C. Cavina & D. Danna (Eds.), Crescere in famiglie omogenitoriali (pp. 89–102). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, C. (2013). Same-sex parented families in Australia (CFCA Paper No. 13). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ippoliti, C., & Schuster, A. (Eds.). (2011). DisOrientamenti. Disciminazione ed esclusione sociale delle persone LGBT in Italia (Vol. 4). Roma: Armando Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleuteri, C., Loparco, A., Proietti Valentini, A., & Santi, S. (2012). L’omogenitorialità: una nuova famiglia? Rivista Di Psicoterapia Relazionale. https://doi.org/10.3280/PR2012-035004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, E., Iudici, A., & Cipolletta, S. (2019). To tell or not to tell? Parents’ reluctance to talking about conceiving their children using medically assisted reproduction. Sexuality and Culture, 23(2), 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, E., Solarino, M., Vitelli, R., & Cipolletta, S. (2018). Normalisation versus medicalisation of sexual disturbances during menopause: A qualitative research in the Italian context. Sexuality and Culture, 22(2), 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis; the critical study of languaje. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, F. (2015). La famiglia inattesa. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruggeri, L. (2007). Il caleidoscopio delle famiglie contemporanee: la pluralità come principio metodologico. In P. Bastianoni & A. Taurino (Eds.), Famiglie e genitorialità oggi. Nuovi significati e prospettive (pp. 41–67). Milano: Unicopli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartrell, N., Rodas, C., Deck, A., Peyser, H., & Banks, A. (2005). The national lesbian family study: 4. Interviews with the 10-year-old children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(4), 518–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2005). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.). Multiliteracies: Lit learning (pp. 51–76). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentili, A. (2013). Un ossimoro giudiziario: l’efficace inefficacia del matrimonio omosessuale. In AA.VV. Le coppie dello stesso sesso: la prima volta in Cassazione a cura di Raffaele Torino, RomaTre-Press, pp. 57–73.

  • Golombok, S., & Tasker, F. (1996). Do parents influence the sexual orientation of their children? Findings from a longitudinal study of lesbian families. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., Mandel, J. B., Hotvedt, M. E., Gray, J., & Smith, L. (1986). Lesbian mothers and their children: A comparison with solo parent heterosexual mothers and their children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (2003). L’homoparentalité. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B., & Turner, P. H. (1986). Gay and lesbian parents. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(2), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa, S. I., & Hayakawa, A. R. (1990). Language in thought and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iudici, A., Antonello, A., & Turchi, G. (2019). Intimate partner violence against disabled persons: Clinical and health impact, intersections, issues and intervention strategies. Sexuality and Culture, 23, 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9570-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iudici, A., & Verdecchia, M. (2015). Homophobic labeling in the process of identity construction. Sexuality and Culture, 19(4), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9287-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. W., Stephenson, S., West, S., Delatycki, M. B., Jones, C. A., Little, M. H., et al. (2017). The kids are OK: It is discrimination, not same-sex parents, that harms children. The Medical Journal of Australia, 207(9), 374–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelleri, R., Pietrantoni, L., Graglia, M., Chiari, C., & Palestini, L. (2005). Sesso e salute di lesbiche, gay e bisessuali oggi in Italia. Sintesi dei principali risultati sociosanitari della ricerca “Modi Di”, realizzata da Arcigay nazionale e dall’Istituto Superiore di Sanità.

  • Lelleri, R., Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L. (2008). Omogenitorialità: i risultati di una ricerca italiana. Difesa sociale, 4, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V. (2013). La famiglia inconcepita. Infanzia e Adolescenza, 12(2), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V., & Carone, N. (2016). Famiglie contemporanee: nuove concezioni, vecchi pregiudizi. Risposta ai commenti. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia/a. XLIII, n. 1-2, marzo-maggio.

  • Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2005). The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V., & Nardelli, N. (2014). Linee guida per la consulenza psicologica e la psicoterapia con persone lesbiche, gay e bisessuali. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacilli, M. G., & Taurino, A. (2009). Omofobia interiorizzata e genitorialità omosessuale: una ricerca condotta con un gruppo di gay e lesbiche italiani. Differenze e disparità: le questioni sui generi in psicologia sociale. Parma: Giornate di studio.

  • Patterson, C. J. (2006). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu, L., Knight, K., & Higgins, D. (2016). Same-sex couple families in Australia (Facts Sheets). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S. S., Korfhage, B. A., Duhigg, J. M., Stern, A. J., Bennett, L., & Riggle, E. D. (2004). Same-sex couple perceptions of family support: A consensual qualitative study. Family Process, 43(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvini, A., & Dondoni, M. (2011). Psicologia clinica dell’interazione e psicoterapia. Firenze: Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappolin, L., & Tiano, A. (2015). Same-sex families e genitorialità omosessuale. Controversie internazionali e spazi di riconoscimento in Italia. Cambio. Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 5(9), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchi, G. P. (2014). Ubi Ius, ibi Societas. Ultra Ius, ibi Communitas. In G. P. Turchi, M. Tocci, & M. Romanelli (Eds.), Libro bianco per la promozione dell’efficienza nell’amministrazione della giustizia. Padova: Cleup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchi, G. P., & Orrù, A. (2014). Metodologia per l’analisi dei dati informatizzati testuali. Napoli: Edises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Toorn, J., Pacilli, M. G., Taurino, A., & Jost, J. (2011). System justification, right-wing conservatism, and internalized homophobia: Gay and lesbian attitudes toward same-sex parenting in Italy. Sex Roles, 65(7–8), 580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Ideologie. Discorso e costruzione sociale del pregiudizio. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainright, J. L., Russell, S. T., & Patterson, C. J. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child Development, 75(6), 1886–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations, trans. GEM Anscombe, 261, 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express appreciation to Alessandra Bertoncello for valuable and constructive suggestions during this article improvement process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 14, Padua, Italy

    Antonio Iudici, Pasquale Masiello, Elena Faccio & Gianpiero Turchi

Authors
  1. Antonio Iudici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pasquale Masiello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elena Faccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gianpiero Turchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Iudici.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iudici, A., Masiello, P., Faccio, E. et al. Tackling Prejudice and Discrimination Towards Families with Same-Sex Parents: An Exploratory Study in Italy. Sexuality & Culture 24, 1544–1561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09711-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09711-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation