Recent research has considered how individuals mark and/or make their sexual identity known to others. Previous research has specifically considered sexuality marking of heterosexual and bisexual individuals. The current study addresses how queer-identified individuals linguistically mark their sexual identity. Participants were 98 self-identified queer adults living within the U.S. recruited online through SurveyMonkey. Preliminary analysis of demographic data revealed that individuals with both monosexual and plurisexual attractions self-identify as queer, with higher rates for the latter. We conducted a thematic analysis of participants’ responses to an open-ended question asking them to describe a setting or situation in which they would choose to use the term queer to self-identify their sexual identity. Four themes emerged related to queer identity marking: (1) Using Queer as an Encompassing Label, (2) Using Queer to Avoid Explanation, (3) Using Queer Based on Who is Present and (4) Avoiding Using Queer. Discussion focuses on the way queer sexual identity marking is both similar to and distinct from other forms of sexuality marking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We use plurisexual to refer to individuals who have the potential to be attracted to more than one gender (Galupo et al. 2015).
Barker, M., Bowes-Catton, H., Iantaffi, A., Cassidy, A., & Brewer, Laurence. (2008). British bisexuality: A snapshot of bisexual representations and identities in the united kingdom. Journal of Bisexuality, 8(1–2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299710802143026.
Barker, M., Richards, C., Jones, R., Bowes-Catton, H., Plowman, T., Yockney, J., & Morgan, M. (2012) The bisexuality report: Bisexual inclusion in LGBT equality and diversity. Retrieved from www.open.ac.uk/ccig/files/ccig/TheBisexualityReportFeb.2012.pdf.
Barker, M. & Scheele, J. (2016) Queer: A graphic history [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from: https://read.amazon.com/?asin=B01GQVMAZY.
Battle, J., Harris, A., Donaldson, V., & Mushtaq, O. (2015). Understanding identity making in the context of sociopolitical involvement among asian and pacific islander american lesbian and bisexual women. Women, Gender, and Families of Color, 3(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5406/womgenfamcol.3.2.0209.
Belmonte, K., & Holmes, T. R. (2016). Outside the LGBTQ “safety zone”: Lesbian and bisexual women negotiate sexual identity across multiple ecological contexts. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(2), 233–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1152932.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Budnick, J. (2016). “Straight girls kissing”? Understanding same-gender sexuality beyond the elite college campus. Gender & Society, 30(5), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216657511.
Callis, A. S. (2014). Bisexual, pansexual, queer: Non-binary identities and the sexual borderlands. Sexualities, 17, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713511094.
Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the makings of the gay male world, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.
Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Huxley, C. (2012). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans appearance and embodiment: A critical review of the psychological literature. Psychology of Sexualities Section Review, 3(1), 51–70.
Davila, J., Jabbour, J., Dyar, C., & Feinstein, B. A. (2019). Bi+ visibility: Characteristics of those who attempt to make their bisexual+ identity visible and the strategies they use. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1284-6.
Davis-Delano, L. R., & Morgan, E. M. (2016). Heterosexual identity management: How social context affects heterosexual marking practices. Identity, 16(4), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2016.1229611.
Davis-Delano, L. R., Morgan, E. M., Gillard, A., & Davis, C. V. (2018). When heterosexuality is questioned: Stifling suspicion through public displays of heterosexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(13), 1683–1708.
de Vries, K. M. (2012). Intersectional identities and conceptions of the self: The experience of transgender people. Symbolic Interaction, 35(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.2.
Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.
Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
Erickson-Schroth, L., & Mitchell, J. (2009). Queering queer theory, or why bisexuality matters. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3–4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299710903316596.
Fassinger, R. E., & Arseneau, J. R. (2007). ‘I’d Rather Get Wet Than Be Under That Umbrella’: Differentiating the Experiences and Identities of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People. In K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, K. A. DeBord, K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, & K. A. DeBord (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (2nd ed., pp. 19–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11482-001.
Flanders, C. E. (2017). Under the bisexual umbrella: Diversity of identity and experience. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1297145.
Galupo, M. P. (2018). Plurisexual identity labels and the marking of bisexual desire. In D. J. Swan, & S. Habibi (Eds.), Understanding bisexuality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71535-3_4.
Galupo, M. P. (2020). Mental health issues for individuals with pansexual and queer identities. In E. D. Rothblum (Ed.), Oxford handbook of sexual and gender minority mental health.
Galupo, M. P., Davis, K. S., Grynkiewiez, A. L., & Mitchell, R. C. (2014). Conceptualization of sexual orientation identity among sexual minorities: Patterns across sexual and gender Identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(3–4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2014.933466.
Galupo, M. P., Henise, S. B., & Mercer, N. L. (2016). “The labels don’t work very well”: Transgender individuals’ conceptualizations of sexual orientation and sexual identity. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1189373.
Galupo, M. P., Lomash, E., & Mitchell, R. C. (2017a). “All of my lovers fit into this scale”: Sexual minority individuals’ responses to two novel measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1174027.
Galupo, M. P., Mitchell, C., & Davis, K. S. (2015). Sexual minority self-identification: Multiple identities and complexity. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000131.
Galupo, M. P., Ramirez, J. L., & Pulice-Farrow, L. (2017b). “Regardless of their gender”: Descriptions of sexual identity among bisexual, pansexual, and queer identified individuals. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1228491.
Ghabrial, M. A. (2019). “We can shapeshift and build bridges”: Bisexual women and gender diverse people of color on invisibility and embracing the borderlands. Journal of Bisexuality, 19(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2019.1617526.
Goldberg, S. K., Rothblum, E. D., Russell, S. T., & Meyer, I. H. (2019). Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: Demographic characteristic and sexuality of queer people in a U.S. representative sample of sexual minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000359.
Gonzalez, K. A., Ramirez, J. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2017). “I was and still am”: Narratives of bisexual marking in the #stillbisexual campaign. Sexuality and Culture, 21, 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9401-y.
Hartman, J. E. (2013). Creating a bisexual display: Making bisexuality visible. Journal of Bisexuality, 13(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2013.755727.
Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., Halliwell, E., & Malson, H. (2013). Visible lesbians and invisible bisexuals: Appearance and visual identities among bisexual women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.015.
Jen, S. (2019). Ambivalence in labels, freedom in lives: Older women’s discursive constructions of their bisexual identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 19(3), 386–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2019.1647908.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1–2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v11n01_04.
Mereish, E. H., Katz-Wise, S. L., & Woulfe, J. (2017). We’re here and we’re queer: Sexual orientation and sexual fluidity differences between bisexual and queer women. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1217448.
Mitchell, R. C., Davis, K. S., & Galupo, M. P. (2015). Comparing perceived experiences of prejudice among self-identified plurisexual individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.940372.
Morandini, J. S., Blaszcynski, A., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2016). Who adopts queer and pansexual identities? The Journal of Sex Research, 54(7), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1249332.
Morgan, M. E., & Davis-Delano, L. R. (2016). Heterosexual marking and binary cultural conceptions of sexual orientation. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2015.1113906.
Pega, F., Gray, A., Veale, J. F., Binson, D., & Sell, R. L. (2013). Toward global comparability of sexual orientation data in official statistics: A conceptual framework of sexual orientation for health data collection in New Zealand’s official statistics system. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2013(473451), 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/473451.
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v49n02_01.
Rust, P. C. (2000). Two many and not enough: The meanings of bisexual identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J159v01n01_04.
Sprott, R. A., & Hadcock, B. B. (2017). Bisexuality, pansexuality, queer identity, and kink identity. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1347616.
Storms, M. D. (1980). Theories of sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.113.
Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: Evidence for new sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-992f1-y.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kolker, Z.M., Taylor, P.C. & Galupo, M.P. “As a Sort of Blanket Term”: Qualitative Analysis of Queer Sexual Identity Marking. Sexuality & Culture 24, 1337–1357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09686-4
- Sexual identity
- Sexuality marking