Research reveals that masturbation is a highly stigmatized behavior for which people are harshly judged. Stigmatized sexual behaviors often result in discrepancies in social judgment such as the Sexual Double Standard (SDS; the tendency to judge women’s sexual behavior more harshly than men’s). However, no research has experimentally examined the SDS with respect to masturbation or the assumed motives influencing the potential SDS. Thus, in study one, a total of 496 U.S. adults (246 women, 250 men) were required to read one of four vignettes depicting a hypothetical man or woman engaged in masturbation. After reading the vignette, the endorsement of the SDS was assessed by asking participants to rate the perceived partner quality of the hypothetical masturbator. In study two, a total of 264 U.S. adults (115 women, 149 men) were again required to read vignettes, rate the target’s perceived partner quality, and report on the assumed pleasure and intimacy-focused motives of the target. The results of both studies revealed a reverse SDS, in which women were viewed as higher quality partners than men. Study two further demonstrated that women were assumed to have masturbated for both pleasure and intimacy-focused motives to a greater extent than men and that these motives helped to explain the reverse SDS. Overall, these findings highlight the need to equalize double standards in Western cultures to reduce potentially harmful effects on sexual health.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
To examine potential racial/cultural differences in U.S. men and women’s judgments, an additional 2 (gender of target) × 4 (race of participant) between-subjects ANOVA was conducted. For this analysis, the race of the participant was collapsed into four categories (due to small cell sizes for certain groups): black/African American, Caucasian, Asian, and other/mixed race. The results revealed that the main effect of the self-identified race of the participant did not influence partner quality judgments of the hypothetical target, F(3, 485) = 1.15, p = .33, ηp2 = 0.01. In addition, the interaction between the gender of the target and the race of the participant also failed to produce significance, F(3, 485) = 2.00, p = .11, ηp2 = 0.01. These results indicate that one’s race does not impact judgments of men and women who engage in masturbation.
To provide additional support that perceived motives mediated the relationship between gender and perceptions of partner quality and not the reverse (perceived partner quality mediated the relationship between gender and perceived motives), two inverse mediational analyses were conducted. In these analyses, the gender of target was still entered as the predictor variable (X), but scores on the PQS were entered as the mediating variable (M), and perceived motives were entered as outcome variables (Y). The results revealed that although the first two requirements to determine mediation were met, the reduction from c to c1 was not significant (p > .05). Thus, despite the cross-sectional design employed in study two, these analyses provide additional support that perceived motives do (in fact) partially explain the relationship between the gender of the target and perceptions of partner quality.
Bowman, C. P. (2017). Masturbation. In L. L. Nadal (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of psychology and gender (pp. 1123–1124). Thousand Oaks, C.A: SAGE Publishing Inc.
Bowman, S. L. (2013). Feminist and multicultural counseling psychology: A blueprint for cooperation. Sex Roles,70, 436–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313514855.
Brown, N. R., & Sinclair, R. C. (1999). Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: Men and women do it differently. The Journal of Sex Research,36, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551999.
Bullough, V. L. (2003). Masturbation: A historical overview. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 14, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v14n02_03.
Burton, N. (2017). For better for worse: Should i get married?. Exeter, Devon: Acheron Press.
Carvalheira, A. A., Brotto, L. A., & Leal, I. (2010). Women’s motivations for sex: Exploring the diagnostic and statistical manual, fourth edition, text revision criteria for hypoactive sexual desire and female sexual arousal disorders. The Journal of Sexual Medicine,7, 1454–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01693.x.
Chowdhury, M. R. H. K., Chowdhury, M. R. K., Nipa, N. S., Kabir, R., Moni, M. A., & Kordowicz, M. (2019). Masturbation experience: A case study of undergraduate students in Bangladesh. Journal of Population and Social Studies,27, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.25133/JPSSv27n4.024.
Coleman, E. (2002). Masturbation as a means of achieving sexual health. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality,14, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v14n02_02.
Conley, T. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01286.x.
Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 1528–1558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528.
Cornog, M. (2003). The BIG book of masturbation: From Angst to Zeal. San Francisco: Down There Press.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research,40, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163.
Das, A. (2007). Masturbation in the United States. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,33, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230701385514.
Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research,42, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552268.
Fahs, B., & Frank, E. (2014). Notes from the back room: Gender, power, and (in)visibility in women’s experiences of masturbation. Journal of Sex Research,51, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.745474.
Fahs, B., & Swank, E. (2013). Adventures with the “Plastic Man”: Sex toys, compulsory heterosexuality, and the politics of women’s sexual pleasure. Sexuality and Culture,17, 666–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9167-4.
Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2015). The costs and benefits of perceived sexual agency for men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 961–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0408-x.
Frank, E. (2016). Masturbation. In N. A. Naples (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1638–1640). Walden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fritz, M. S., Taylor, A. B., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2012). Explanation of two anomalous results in statistical mediation analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research,47, 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.640596.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Harvey, C. A., Harvey, T. A., & Thompson, A. E. (2019). The “sextual” double standard: An experimental examination of variations in judgments of men and women who engage in computer-mediated sexual communication. Sexuality and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09658-8.
Hatfield, E., Luckhurst, C., & Rapson, R. (2011). Sexual motives: The impact of gender, personality, and social context on sexual motives and sexual behavior—Especially risky sexual behavior. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships,5, 95–133. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v5i2.60.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Herbenick, D., Bowling, J., Fu, T. C. J., Dodge, B., Guerra-Reyes, L., & Sanders, S. (2017). Sexual diversity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative probability sample of adult women and men. PLoS ONE,12, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181198.
Herbenick, D., Fu, T. C., Arter, J., Sanders, S. A., & Dodge, B. (2018). Women’s experiences with genital touching, sexual pleasure, and orgasm: Results from a US probability sample of women ages 18–94. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,44, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1346530.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: Results from a nationally representative study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine,6, 1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01318.x.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a National Probability Sample of Men and Women Ages 14–94. International Society for Sexual Medicine,7, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02012.x.
Herdt, G. (2005). The Sambia: Ritual, sexuality, and change in Papua New Guinea. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research,39, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552150.
Higgins, L. T., Zheng, M., Liu, Y., & Sun, C. H. (2002). Attitudes to marriage and sexual behaviors: A survey of gender and culture differences in China and United Kingdom. Sex Roles,46, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016565426011.
Hogarth, H., & Ingham, R. (2009). Masturbation among young women and associations with sexual health: An exploratory study. Journal of Sex Research,46, 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902878993.
Hurlbert, D. F., & Whittaker, K. E. (1991). The role of masturbation in marital and sexual satisfaction: A comparative study of female masturbators and nonmasturbators. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy,17, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1991.11074029.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist,60, 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
Hyde, J. S., & Jaffee, S. R. (2000). Becoming a heterosexual adult: The experiences of young women. Journal of Social Issues,56, 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00166.
Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. The Journal of Sex Research,40, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169.
Jonason, P. K. (2007). A meditation hypothesis is to account for the sex difference in reported number of sexual partners: An intrasexual competition approach. International Journal of Sexual Health,19, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J514v19n04_05.
Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles,60, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z.
Kaestle, C. E., & Allen, K. R. (2011). The role of masturbation in healthy sexual development: Perceptions of young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9722-0.
Kelly, J., & Bazzini, D. G. (2001). Gender, sexual experience, and the sexual double standard: Evaluations of female contraceptive behavior. Sex Roles,45, 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015640419862.
Kettrey, H. H. (2016). What’s gender got to do with it? Sexual double standards and power inheterosexual college hookups. The Journal of Sex Research,53, 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181.
Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research,44, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701263660.
Kontula, O., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (2003). Masturbation in a generational perspective. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,14, 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v14n02_05.
Kristal, A. R., Glanz, K., Tilley, B. C., & Li, S. H. (2000). Mediating factors in dietary change: Understanding the impact of a worksite nutrition intervention. Health Education and Behavior,27, 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700110.
LaMar, L., & Kite, M. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective. The Journal of Sex Research,35, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551932.
Lamont, E. (2017). “We can write the scripts ourselves”: Queer challenges to heteronormative courtship practices. Gender & Society,31, 624–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217723883.
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in psychological science. Psychological Science,26, 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679765616374.
Madanikia, Y., Bartholomew, K., & Cytrynbaum, J. B. (2013). Depiction of masturbation in North American movies. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,22, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2013.2052.
Mark, K. P., & Haus, K. R. (2019). Culture and sexuality. In N. Gambescia, G. Weeks, & K. M. Hertlein (Eds.), Systemic sex therapy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420.
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods,12, 23. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23.
Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research,46, 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716.
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is Psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “Failure to Replicate” really mean? American Psychologist,70, 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400.
Meiller, C., & Hargons, C. N. (2019). “It’s happiness and relief and release”: Exploring masturbation among bisexual and queer women. Journal of Counseling Sexology & Sexual Wellness: Research, Practice, and Education,1, 1–12.
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2.
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. The Journal of Sex Research,36, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909552008.
O’Sullivan, L. F., Cheng, M. M., Harris, K. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). I wanna hold your hand: The progression of social, romantic and sexual events in adolescent relationships. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,39, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1363/3910007.
Papp, L. J., Hagerman, C., Gnoleba, M. A., Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., et al. (2015). Exploring perceptions of slut-shaming on Facebook: Evidence for a reverse sexual double standard. Gender Issues,32, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0866-4.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin,136, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504.
Prause, N. (2019). Porn is for masturbation. Archives of Sexual Behavior,48, 2271–2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1397-6.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
Regnerus, M., Price, J., & Gordon, D. (2017). Masturbation and partnered sex: Substitutes or complements? Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 2111–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0975-8.
Sakaluk, J. K., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit sexual double standards. Journal of Sex Research,49, 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.569976.
Sanchez, D. T., Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Good, J. J. (2012). The gender role motivation model of women’s sexually submissive behavior and satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,38, 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211430088.
Schneider, I. K., Veenstra, L., van Harreveld, F., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2016). Let’s not be indifferent about neutrality: Neutral ratings in the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) mask mixed affective responses. Emotion,16, 426. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000164.
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society,22, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701260.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology,13, 290–312.
Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among U.S. college students: Comparison with Russian and Japanese students. Archives of Sexual Behavior,25, 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438165.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tackett, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Johnsom, S. L., Krueger, R. F., Miller, J. D., et al. (2017). It’s time to broaden the replicability conversation: Thoughts for and from clinical psychological science. Perspectives on Psycholological Science,12, 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617690042.
Thompson, A. E., Hart, J., Stefaniak, S., & Harvey, C. (2018). Exploring heterosexual adults’ endorsement of the sexual double standard among initiators of consensually nonmonogamous relationship behaviors. Sex Roles,79, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0866-4.
Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2013). The relationship between men’s facial masculinity and women’s judgments of value as a potential romantic partner. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.929.
Tiegs, T. J., Perrin, P. B., Kaly, P. W., & Heesacker, M. (2007). My place or yours? An inductive approach to sexuality and gender role conformity. Sex Roles,56, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9185-5.
Tolman, D. L., Kim, J. L., Schooler, C., & Sorsoli, C. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus. Journal of Adolescent Health,40, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.08.002.
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 2273–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2.
Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2016). Changes in American adults’ reported same-sex sexual experiences and attitudes, 1973–2014. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 1717–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0769-4.
Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2011). Communicating interest in sex: Verbal and nonverbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7.
Wesche, R., Espinosa-Hernandez, G., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2016). Gender’s role in misperceptions of peers’ sexual motives. Sexuality and Culture,20, 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9370-1.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal,13, 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729.
Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z.
Young, C. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2011). Attitudes toward masturbation scale. In T. D. Fisher, C. C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (3rd ed., pp. 491–494). New York: Routledge.
Young, V. J., & Burke, T. J. (2017). Self, partner and relationship motivations for healthy and unhealthy behaviors. Health Psychology Report,5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2017.65221.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Creed, P. A., & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence,29, 911–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008.
Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,e120, 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17001972.
Funding was provided by University of Minnesota, Duluth, Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (University of Minnesota Human Research Protection Program; STUDY00001893) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Haus, K.R., Thompson, A.E. An Examination of the Sexual Double Standard Pertaining to Masturbation and the Impact of Assumed Motives. Sexuality & Culture 24, 809–834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09666-8
- Sexual double standard
- Perceived gender differences