The “Sextual” Double Standard: An Experimental Examination of Variations in Judgments of Men and Women Who Engage in Computer-Mediated Sexual Communication
- 21 Downloads
Although computer-mediated sexual communication (i.e., sexting) is a common behavior, research indicates that perceptions of sexting are generally negative. However, no research has attempted to quantitatively examine how perceptions of sexting vary according to the gender of the individuals involved. Thus, the current study investigated the endorsement of the sexual double standard (SDS; defined as the tendency to judge women more harshly than men for engaging in comparable sexual behavior) when evaluating hypothetical individuals who engage in sexting. A total of 949 U.S. adults (512 men, 438 women) participated in a between-subject experimental paradigm, in which they were randomly assigned to read one of 16 vignettes depicting a hypothetical sexting scenario and evaluate one of the individuals involved using three constructs of interest (morality, cognitive abilities, partner quality). The results provided no evidence of a SDS with respect to sexting, with hypothetical men and women being judged similarly on three constructs of interest. However, judgments of those who sext were largely influenced by the target’s role in the interaction (sender/receiver, requester/non-requester) and the familiarity of those involved (casual/committed partners). Hypothetical targets described as sexting with a casual partner and adopting an active role were judged as less moral, having lower cognitive abilities, and being poorer quality partners than those described as sexting a committed partner and adopting a passive role. Overall, these results indicate that the traditional SDS has given way to an egalitarian standard, perhaps due to recent societal shifts. Implications for investigators, educators, and practitioners are discussed.
KeywordsSexual double standard Computer-mediated sexual communication Sexting Sexual script theory
This work was supported by a graduate student internal grant from the Department of Psychology at the University of Minnesota Duluth.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brand, A. N. (2015). From locked doors to locked screens: The implications of sexting as a gendered performance (master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1591469).Google Scholar
- Danube, C. L., Norris, J., Stappenbeck, C. A., Davis, K. C., George, W. H., Zawacki, T., et al. (2016). Partner type, sexual double standard endorsement, and ambivalence predict abdication and unprotected sex intentions in a community sample of young women. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1061631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., Steiner, J. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Understanding differences in sexting behaviors across gender, relationship status, and sexual identity, and the role of expectancies in sexting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horowitz, J. M., Parker, K., & Stepler, R. (2017). Wide partisan gaps in U.S. over how far the country has come on gender equality. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-hascome-on-gender-equality/.
- Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Demographics of Mechanical Turk. New York University, Working Paper Series, Working Paper CEDER-10-01. Available at: https://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/29585/2/CeDER-10-01-.pdf?_htsc=214931602.e72c280a7921bf0d7ab734f9822a9c39.1532390400111.1532390400112.15323.1532390400113.1&_hssc=214931602.1.1532390400114&_hsfp=1773666937.
- Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Cortina, L. M., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2017). Girl power or powerless girl? Television, sexual scripts, and sexual agency in sexually active young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316677028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 53–60.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Techasrivichien, T., Darawuttimaprakorn, N., Punpuing, S., Musumari, P. M., Lukhele, B. W., El-saaidi, C., et al. (2016). Changes in sexual behavior and attitudes across generations and gender among a population-based probability sample from an urbanizing province in Thailand. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0429-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). 2017 American community survey data wheel. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/2017-datawheel.html,