Abstract
‘Dick pics’ are self-taken pictures of penises sent by men via digital devices such as smartphones. Although the unsolicited sending of dick pics has become an object of public and academic attention, few empirical studies have investigated this phenomenon. Based on data from seven same-sex focus group interviews with young adults this qualitative study explores personal experiences with receiving and sending unsolicited dick pics and collective understandings of this phenomenon. Results show that girls experience unsolicited dick pics as intrusive and see them as misguided attempts at flirting, while boys perceive the sending of dick pics as a way of showing off, complimenting, hooking-up with or getting nude pictures in return from girls. Analyses show how these explanations draw on gendered constructions of heterosexuality and how humorous framings of male nudity serve to both reduce the potential consequences of having dick pics shared and undermine the intimidating experience of receiving them. Results are discussed in relation to research on sexting and suggestions for future research are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Denmark, this is a 3-year upper secondary education called the ‘gymnasium’, which gives access to university- and other tertiary education.
Directly translated ‘The Children’s Telephone’ and ‘The Sex Line’, respectively.
Snapchat is a social media application that allows users to send images and video that is automatically erased 1–10 s after the receiver has opened them.
A type of selfie in which ‘subjects pose naked with a baseball cap (or other hat) strategically covering their breasts or genitals’ (Albury 2015, p. 1738).
References
Albury, K. (2015). Selfies, sexts and sneaky hats: Young people’s understandings of gendered practices of self-representation. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 1734–1745.
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum,26(3), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665840.
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage.
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture,17(4), 686–704.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77–101.
Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality and Culture,19(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0.
Davis, M. S. (1983). Smut: Erotic reality/obscene ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities,10(3), 339–359.
García-Gómez, A. (2017). Teen girls and sexual agency: Exploring the intrapersonal and intergroup dimensions of sexting. Media, Culture and Society,39(3), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716683789.
Gill, R., Henwood, K., & McLean, C. (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body & Society,11(1), 37–62.
Gillett, R. (2018). Intimate intrusions online: Studying the normalisation of abuse in dating apps. Women’s Studies International Forum, 69, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.04.005.
Grazian, D. (2007). The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction,30(2), 221–243.
Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Hatuka, T., & Toch, E. (2016). The emergence of portable private-personal territory: Smartphones, social conduct and public spaces. Urban Studies,53(10), 2192–2208.
Hayes, R. M., & Dragiewicz, M. (2018). Unsolicited dick pics: Erotica, exhibitionism or entitlement? Women's Studies International Forum, 71, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.001.
Hess, A., & Flores, C. (2018). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis of toxic masculine performances on Tinder Nightmares. New Media & Society,20(3), 1085–1102.
Jewell, J. A., & Brown, C. S. (2013). Sexting, catcalls, and butt slaps: How gender stereotypes and perceived group norms predict sexualized behavior. Sex Roles,69(11–12), 594–604.
Kandemir, A., & Budd, R. (2018). Using vignettes to explore reality and values with young people. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.2.2914.
Kofoed, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2016). A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905.
Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…if you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media,8(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009.
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics,172(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314.
March, E., & Wagstaff, D. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02210
McAteer, O. (2017). Anthony Weiner jailed for sexting underage girl photos of his penis. Metro. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://metro.co.uk/2017/09/25/anthony-weiner-jailed-for-sexting-underage-girl-photos-of-his-penis-6954415/.
Miller, J. (2014). The fourth screen: Mediatization and the smartphone. Mobile Media & Communication,2(2), 209–226.
Paasonen, S., Light, B., & Jarrett, K. (2019). The dick pic: harassment, curation, and desire. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119826126.
Phipps, A., & Young, I. (2015). ‘Lad culture’in higher education: Agency in the sexualization debates. Sexualities,18(4), 459–479.
Renfrow, D. G., & Rollo, E. A. (2014). Sexting on campus: Minimizing perceived risks and neutralizing behaviors. Deviant Behavior,35(11), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.897122.
Ricciardelli, R., & Adorjan, M. (2019). ‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if a guy’s photo gets sent around’: Gender, sexting, and the teenage years. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(5), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1560245.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory,14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853.
Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018). Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: Networked feminist humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies,18(4), 686–704.
Ritzau. (2018). Minister vil sætte en stopper for uønskede ‘dick pics’ blandt unge. TV2. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from http://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2018-09-15-minister-vil-saette-en-stopper-for-uoenskede-dick-pics-blandt-unge.
Roesner, F., Gill, B. T., & Kohno, T. (2014). Sex, lies, or kittens? Investigating the use of snapchat’s self-destructing messages. In N. Christin & R. Safavi-Naini (Eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8437. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_5.
Rosenberger, R. (2015). An experiential account of phantom vibration syndrome. Computers in Human Behavior,52, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.065.
Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9–41). New York: Lexington Books.
Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media & Society,18(11), 2723–2739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604133.
Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world (Vol. 1). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Smith, M. (2018). Four in ten female millennials have been sent an unsolicited penis photo. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from https://yougov.co.uk/topics/relationships/articles-reports/2018/02/16/four-ten-female-millennials-been-sent-dick-pic.
Thompson, L. (2016). Dickpics are no joke: Cyber-flashing, misogyny and online dating. The Conversation. Retrieved June 21, 2019 from http://theconversation.com/dickpics-are-no-joke-cyber-flashing-misogyny-and-online-dating-53843.
Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society,34(2), 59–70.
Tziallas, E. (2015). Gamified eroticism: Gay male “social networking” applications and self-pornography. Sexuality and Culture,19(4), 759–775.
Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,18(3), 141–146.
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Adolescent sexting research: The challenges ahead. JAMA Pediatrics,172, 405–406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0013.
Van Royen, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & Walrave, M. (2018). Slut-shaming 2.0. In M. Walrave, J. Van Ouytsel, K. Ponnet, & J. R. Temple (Eds.), Sexting: Motives and risk in online sexual self-presentation (pp. 81–98). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Vitis, L., & Gilmour, F. (2016). Dick pics on blast: A woman’s resistance to online sexual harassment using humour, art and Instagram. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal,13(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016652445.
Waling, A., & Pym, T. (2017). ‘C’mon, No One Wants a Dick Pic’: exploring the cultural framings of the ‘Dick Pic’ in contemporary online publics. Journal of Gender Studies,28(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1394821.
Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health,52(6), 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.026.
Walker, S., Temple-Smith, M., Higgs, P., & Sanci, L. (2015). ‘It’s always just there in your face’: Young people’s views on porn. Sex Health,12(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14225.
Waskul, D. D., & Plante, R. F. (2010). Sex (ualities) and symbolic interaction. Symbolic Interaction,33(2), 148–162.
Yeung, T. H., Horyniak, D. R., Vella, A. M., Hellard, M. E., & Lim, M. S. (2014). Prevalence, correlates and attitudes towards sexting among young people in Melbourne, Australia. Sex Health,11(4), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
The study was registered and approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Human and Animal Rights
The study involved human participants and all procedures were performed in accordance with the Policy for Responsible Conduct of Research and Code of Practice at Aarhus University and the Principles on Responsible Scientific Conduct at Aarhus BSS. All procedures were also in accordance with the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2014) which is based on international declarations and principles for research integrity and responsible research practice including the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2011).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mandau, M.B.H. ‘Directly in Your Face’: A Qualitative Study on the Sending and Receiving of Unsolicited ‘Dick Pics’ Among Young Adults. Sexuality & Culture 24, 72–93 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09626-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09626-2