Skip to main content
Log in

Would Mozambican Women Really “Tolerate” Their Husbands’ Extramarital Sexual Relationships as Socially Recommended?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Mozambican socio-cultural context, men’s extramarital sexual relationships are generally deemed acceptable, and women are “recommended” to forgive their husbands’ sexual infidelity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess to what extent Mozambican women would forgive their husbands in case of an extramarital sexual relationship. The material consisted of 24 vignettes—each of which contained the story of a husband who was having an extramarital sexual relationship—a question, and an 11-point response scale. Overall, 225 women indicated their willingness to forgive their husbands in case of sexual infidelity, as a function of three factors: the emotional intensity involved in the extramarital sexual relationship, the regret expressed by the husband, and the commitment involved in the relationship/marriage between the husband and his wife. ANOVA results showed that the willingness to forgive depends on the nature of the extramarital relationship and the attitude of the “cheater”: (a) in the case where the extramarital relationship was of a purely sexual type, without involving deep emotions, and when the husband expressed profound regret, the willingness to forgive was high; (b) in the opposite situation, i.e., when the extramarital relationship involved a high level of emotions, and the husband expressed no regret, the forgiveness was low. Older participants had relatively high rates of forgiveness compared to younger ones. These findings corroborate earlier studies showing that, for females, emotional infidelity was much more distressful than purely sexual infidelity, and corroborate studies showing that Mozambicans tend to forgive offenders when they express regret.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As each of the 24 scenarios described an extramarital sexual relationship, the categorization of the different levels of emotion, regret, and commitment were qualitatively made (described) in each scenario. For emotion, the categorization words used was respectively not at all (low), moderate (low-moderate), deep (moderate-high), desperate (high) passion/feelings/attachment. For regret the categorization words was respectively no (low), mere (moderate), deep (high) apology/remorse/regret. The degree of the commitment within the couple was measured in function of the years of marriage and the number of children: three years of marriage and no children (low commitment) and 15 years of marriage and two children (high commitment). The scenarios were written in Portuguese, the official language in Mozambique. The choice of the categorization words and the number of levels (modalities) for each factor was a result of a series of four tests we effectuated among a sample composed of 40 individuals, while elaborating and validating the material.

References

  • Allen, E. S., Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., Gordon, K. C., & Glass, S. P. (2005). Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual factors in engaging in and responding to extramarital involvement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12, 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, E. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadic involvement. Family Process, 43, 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 612–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. NewYork: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (2016). Information integration theory: Unified psychology based on three mathematical laws. Universitas Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-3.iitu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2011). Monogamies and non-monogamies: A response to “The challenge of monogamy: Bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room” by Marianne Brandon. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 26(3), 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, A. J., & Harnet, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationship II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1752-0606-2005.tb01556x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Ministry of Health. (2007, July 7). Brazilian demographic and health survey 20062007. Retrieved from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/brazil-national-demographic-and-health-survey-children-and-women-2006-2007.

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. R. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research Personality, 31, 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2017, September 22). Marriage and divorce statistics. Eurostat: Statistics Explained. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Marriage_and_divorce_statistics.

  • Falconi, A., & Mullet, E. (2003). Cognitive algebra of love through the adult live. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57(3), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F., Hall, J., & Beach, S. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, S. P., & Wright, T. L. (1992). Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, K., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2005). Forgiveness in couples: Divorce, infidelity, and couples therapy. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 407–422). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R., & Christenfeld, N. (1996). Gender, jealousy, and reason. Psychological Science, 7(6), 364–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemez, P. (2016, February 10). Attitudes towards marital infidelity. Family profiles, FP-16-12. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from http://www.bgs4.edu/ncfmr/resources/data.

  • Kadima Kadiangandu, J., Gauché, M., Vinsonneau, G., & Mullet, E. (2007). Conceptualizations of forgiveness: Collectivist-congolose versus individualist-French viewpoints. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1996). The long walk to freedom. London: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozambican Office for Statistics. (2017). Dados estatísticos anuais [Annual statistical data]. Maputo: INE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullet, E. (2017). Popular between-subject versus unpopular within-subject designs. In Conference paper presented at the 6th information integration theory and functional measurement conference, Montreal, Canada, June 14–16, 2017.

  • Mullet, E., Barros, J., Frongia, L., Usai, V., & Neto, F. (2003). Religious involvement and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 71, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013, September 11). French more accepting of infidelity than people in other countries. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/14/french-more-accepting-of-infidelity-than-people-in-other-countries/.

  • Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2008, October 11). General social surveys, 19722014. Sponsored by National Science Foundation: NORC at the University of Chicago. Retrieved from the GSS Data Explorer http://gssdataexplorer.norc.org/.

  • Spira, A., & Bajos, N. (2006). Les comportements sexuels en France [Sexual behavior in France]. Paris: Editions de la Documentation Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2017). The 2016 rapport on human development. New York: PNUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G. (1994). Reunification familiar post-conflicto em Moçambique [Post-war family reunification in Mozambique]. Diário de Moçambique, 55(XIII), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G. (2007). Les attitudes sexuelles des Mozambicains. Comparaison avec les attitudes sexuelles des Français [Mozambican sexual attitudes. Comparison with French sexual attitudes]. Lille: Anrt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G. (2013). The effect of sex knowledge, parent-child attachment, and family characteristics on intimate relationship satisfaction of Mozambican students. Sexuality and Culture, 15(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9170-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G. (2015). Sexuality, love and physical attractiveness: Euro-Western vs. Southern Africa perspectives. Berlin: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G. (2017). Love in cross-cultural perspective: Mozambique-France comparison. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 27(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2017.1347754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G., & Maússe, L. (2014). Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships among Mozambican women from high socio-economic status and with high education degrees: Involvement motives. Psychology, 5, 1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.510138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G., & Mullet, E. (2012). Sexual attitudes among Mozambican adults. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 4(6), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPC12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera Cruz, G., Vinsonneau, G., Rivière, S., Le Gall, A., & Mullet, E. (2010). Sexual permissiveness: A Mozambique-France comparison. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(10), 2488–2499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, K., Collumbien, M., Slaymakcr, E., Singh, S., Hodges, Z., Patel, D., et al. (2006). Sexual behaviour in context: A global perspective. The Lancet, 368, 1706–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare, B. (2011). Review of studies on infidelity. In Conference paper presented at the 3rd international conference on advanced management sciences, Singapore, July 13–15, 2011.

  • Zhang, N., Parish, W. L., & Pan, S. (2012). Sexual infidelity in Chine: Prevalence and gender-specific correlates. Archive of Sexual Behavior, 41(4), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9930-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germano Vera Cruz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vera Cruz, G. Would Mozambican Women Really “Tolerate” Their Husbands’ Extramarital Sexual Relationships as Socially Recommended?. Sexuality & Culture 22, 1263–1278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9520-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9520-8

Keywords

Navigation