Fifty Shades of Feminism: An Analysis of Feminist Attitudes and ‘Grey Behaviors’

Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

This paper discusses the results of an MTurk survey (n = 479) that was designed to determine how acceptable Americans find the behaviors outlined in the Fifty Shades of Grey series, especially when they self-identify with feminist ideologies. The behaviors that this series eroticizes clearly reflect interpersonal violence. This coupled with the series’ unprecedented international success raises concerns for many scholars. We asked men and women to rank the level of acceptability on a ‘Grey Behavior’ scale, which included measures of control of person outside the context of ‘kinky’ sex. Furthermore, we asked subjects to rank their attitudes regarding the basic tenants of the feminist ideology in order to determine if support of gender equality influenced these perceptions of acceptability. Our findings suggest that despite the popularity of the book, neither men nor women report these behaviors as personally acceptable.

Keywords

Fifty Shades of Grey Interpersonal violence Feminism Pornography 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Barker, M. (2013). Consent is a grey area? A comparison of understandings of consent in Fifty Shades of Grey and on the BDSM blogosphere. Sexualities, 16(8), 896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonomi, A. E., Altenburer, L. E., & Walton, N. L. (2013). Double Crap! Abuse and harmed identity in Fifty Shades of Grey. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(9), 733–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonomi, A. E., Nemeth, J. M., Altenburger, L. E., Anderson, M. L., Snyder, A., & Dotto, I. (2014). Fiction or not? Fifty Shades is associated with health risks in adolescent and young adult females. Journal of Women’s Health, 23(9), 720–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, D. (2002). Pornography-what is the problem? Critical Quarterly, 34(2), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daileader, C. R. (2001). The uses of ambivalence: Pornography and female heterosexual identity. Women’s Studies, 26, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalessandro, C., & Wilkins, A. C. (2017). Blinded by love: Women, men and gendered age in relationship stories. Gender & Society, 31(1), 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, K. (2013). Complicit sex: Or what’s feminism got to do with it? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(2), 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dines, G. (2014). Rethinking Fifty Shades of Grey within a feminist media context. Journal of Women’s Health, 23(9), i–ii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downing, L. (2013). Safewording! Kinkophobia and gender normativity in Fifty Shades of Grey. Psychology and Sexuality, 4(1), 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eaton, A. W. (2007). A sensible anti-porn feminism. Ethics, 117, 674–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flood, A. (2014). Fifty Shades of Grey is really a self-help book, says academic. The Guardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/27/fifty-shades-of-grey-self-help-el-james.
  13. Furguson, C. J., & Olson, C. K. (2014). Video game violence use among ‘‘vulnerable’’ populations: The impact of violent games on delinquency and bullying among children with clinically elevated depression or attention deficit symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, E. (2015). Consent isn’t enough: The troubling sex of Fifty Shades. The Atlantic. February 10, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/02/consent-isnt-enough-in-fifty-shades-of-grey/385267/.
  15. Harvard Law Review. (2014). Nonbinding bondage (Vol. 128, pp. 713–734). Cambridge: Harvard Law Review Association.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, I. Q. (2013). Pre-reading and failing to read Fifty Shades of Grey. Sexualities, 16(8), 969–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James, E. L. (2011). Fifty Shades of Grey. New York: First Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar
  18. James, E. L. (2012a). Fifty Shades Darker. New York: First Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar
  19. James, E. L. (2012b). Fifty Shades Freed. New York: First Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Lanciano, T., Soleti, E., Guglielmi, F., Mangiulli, I., & Curci, A. (2016). Fifty shades of unsaid: Women’s explicit and implicit attitudes towards sexual morality. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leistner, C. E., & Mark, K. P. (2016). Fifty shades of sexual health and BDSM identity messaging: A thematic analysis of the Fifty Shades series. Sexuality and Culture, 20, 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maas, M. K., Shearer, C. L., Gillen, M. M., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2015). Sex rules: Emerging adults’ perceptions of gender’s impact on sexuality. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 617–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morehead, P. D. (1995). The new American Webster handy college dictionary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Signet.Google Scholar
  25. Moser, C., & Levitt, E. E. (1987). An exploratory-descriptive study of a sadomasochistically oriented sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 23(3), 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parry, D. C., & Light, T. P. (2014). Fifty shades of complexity. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(1), 38–57.Google Scholar
  27. Schussler, A. (2011). The relation between feminism and pornography. The Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies, 3(5), 66–71.Google Scholar
  28. Sonnet, E. (1999). Erotic fiction by women for women: The pleasures of post-feminist heterosexuality. Sexualities, 2(2), 167–187.Google Scholar
  29. Stevens, S. (2014). Rope sluts, and bottoms, and subs, oh my: 50 Shades of Grey and the shifting discourse of female submission in feminist kink porn. The Communication Review, 17, 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Upstone, S. (2016). Beyond the bedroom: Motherhood in E.L. James’s Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy. Frontiers, 37(2), 138–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Reenen, D. (2014). Is this really what women want? An analysis of Fifty Shades of Grey and modern feminist thought. South African Journal of Philosophy, 33(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson, L. (2007). Pornography and public reason. Social Theory and Practice, 33(3), 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weinberg, T. S. (2006). Sadomasochism and the social sciences: A review of the sociological and social psychological literature. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(2/3), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., & Moser, C. (1984). The social constituents of sadomasochism. Social Problems, 31(4), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whisnant, R. (2007). Pornography and pop culture: Backlash and a feminism that is contrary to feminism. Off Our Backs, 37(1), 58–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Arts and LettersThe University of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations