In 2016, Californians voted down Proposition #60, which aimed to mandate condom use in pornography. Using an online survey administered through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, this study assessed how California citizens’ sexual entertainment preferences and viewing behaviors relate to their support for regulation. Findings generally suggest some aversion to condom use in pornography, especially among heterosexual males. Data suggest the more pornography one watches, the more averse one is to condoms in pornography, as well more opposed to regulation. Results varied more by gender than sexual orientation. Implications for third-person effects in relation to highly stigmatized topics are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Brosius, H. B., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 142–162.
California Proposition 60: The California Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act, California. (2015). Retrieved from https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/15-0004%20(Safer%20Sex)_8.pdf?.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15.
Downing, M. J., Jr., Schrimshaw, E. W., Antebi, N., & Siegel, K. (2014). Sexually explicit media on the Internet: A content analysis of sexual behaviors, risk, and media characteristics in gay male adult videos. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(4), 811–821.
Downing, M. J., Schrimshaw, E. W., Scheinmann, R., Antebi-Gruszka, N., & Hirshfield, S. (2017). Sexually explicit media use by sexual identity: A comparative analysis of gay, bisexual, and heterosexual men in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1763–1776.
Gaither, G. A., Rownkranz, R. R., Amato-henderson, S., Plaud, J. J., & Bigwood, S. J. (1996). The effect of condoms in sexually explicit narratives on male sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22(2), 103–109.
Gorman, S., Monk-Turner, E., & Fish, J. N. (2010). Free adult Internet web sites: How prevalent are degrading acts? Gender Issues, 27(3–4), 131–145.
Grudzen, C. R., Elliott, M. N., Kerndt, P. R., Schuster, M. A., Brook, R. H., & Gelberg, L. (2009). Condom use and high-risk sexual acts in adult films: A comparison of heterosexual and homosexual films. American Journal of Public Health, 99(S1), S152–S156.
Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 27–38.
Kraus, S. W., & Rosenberg, H. (2016). Lights, camera, condoms! Assessing college men’s attitudes toward condom use in pornography. Journal of American College Health, 64(2), 139–146.
Kyes, K. B. (1990). The effect of a “safer sex” film as mediated by erotophobia and gender on attitudes toward condoms. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(4), 1–18.
Kyes, K. B., Brown, I. S., & Pollack, R. H. (1991). The effect of exposure to a condom script on attitudes toward condoms. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 4(1), 21–36.
Lee, B., & Tamborini, R. (2005). Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 292–310.
Lee, C., & Yang, S. (1996). Third-person perception and support for censorship of sexually explicit visual content: A Korean case. Sungkok Journalism Review, 7, 21–39.
Lo, V. H., & Paddon, A. (2001). Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 11(1), 120–142.
Lo, V. H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 13–33.
Lo, V. H., Wei, R., & Wu, H. (2010). Examining the first, second and third-person effects of Internet pornography on Taiwanese adolescents: Implications for the restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(1), 90–103.
Mowlabocus, S., Harbottle, J., & Witzel, C. (2014). What we can’t see? Understanding the representations and meanings of UAI, barebacking, and semen exchange in gay male pornography. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(10), 1462–1480.
Nelson, K. M., Eaton, L. A., & Gamarel, K. E. (2017). Preferences for condomless sex in sexually explicit media among Black/African American men who have sex with men: Implications for HIV prevention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(4), 977–985.
Pauly, M. (2016). California’s Fight Over Condoms in Porn Is About to Climax. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/condoms-porn-ballot-initiative-proposition-60.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet. Communication Research, 33(2), 178–204.
Sullivan, G. (2014). How making actors wear condoms could kill California’s porn business. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/06/how-making-actors-wear-condoms-could-kill-californias-porn-business/?utm_term=.5aae5ee79d1b.
The New York Times. (2017). California Proposition 60—Condoms in pornographic films initiative—results: Rejected. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/california-ballot-measure-60-adult-film-health-reqs.
Vannier, S. A., Currie, A. B., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2014). Schoolgirls and soccer moms: A content analysis of free “teen” and “MILF” online pornography. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(3), 253–264.
Wright, S. S., & Kyes, K. B. (1996). The effects of safer-sex stories on college students’ attitudes toward condoms. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(4), 1–18.
Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2008). From self-enhancement to supporting censorship: The third-person effect process in the case of Internet pornography. Mass Communication and Society, 11(4), 437–462.
Conflict of interest
Kyla Garrett Wagner declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Joseph M. Cabosky declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, K.G., Cabosky, J.M. My Sexual Entertainment, My Vote: How Attitudes Toward Condom Use in Pornography Related to Support for California’s Condom Law. Sexuality & Culture 22, 422–436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9475-1
- Adult entertainment
- Condom use
- Media and social science