Abstract
Several scholarly works abound on the language of sexting and how it affects users’ lives. This study is an attempt to investigate the language of sexting on the social media and its impact on spousal relationship in Nigeria. Sexting is defined here as the sending and receiving of sexually inclined messages or pictures via any of the social media. We have purposively selected a screenshot sexting message of a popular Nigerian comedian. The methodology adopted is eclectic. We use pragmatic tools with insights from the epistemological and critical tools of philosophy. We also use ideas from semiotics to analyse the smileys in the text. We also conducted interviews with purposively selected educated married Nigerians to study the printed screenshot message and interpret the meanings they can deduce from the message. Findings reveal that the language of sexting is highly of coded forms. The discourse strategies used include: slang, ellipsis and smileys. The conversational pattern reveals a flouting of the conversational maxims of quantity and relevance. A lot of shared beliefs are also foregrounded in the use of the elliptical sign and slang words. The message attached to the screenshot message is a pract of warning with 3 speech acts: declarative, assertive and directive. Sexting is a common feature of new trends on the social media. It serves several functions for the chat partners. If the motivation for sexting is not understood, its practice could generate crises among spouses. Sexting opens up different angles for linguistic interpretation and its psychological realities cannot be generalized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates, J. A. (2004). Hegel’s theory of imagination. New York: State University Press.
Chafe, W. (2001). Laughing while talking. In D. Tannen & J. Alatis (Eds.), Linguistics, language and the real world: Discourse and beyond (pp. 36–49). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Goldman, A. H. (2005). Plain sex. In J. Arthur (Ed.), Morality and moral controversies: Readings in moral, social and political philosophy (pp. 275–283). London: Prentice Hall.
Goshgarian, G. (2001). Exploring language (9th ed.). London: Longman.
Hasinoff, A. A. (2012). Sexting as media production: Rethinking social media and sexuality. New Media and Society, 15(4), 449–465.
Jackson, H., & Stockwell, P. (2011). An Introduction to the nature and functions of language. London: Continuum.
Kelly, G. F. (2004). Sexuality today: The human perspective (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill companies.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D., & Mellor, D. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53.
Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Pew Research center report. http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/teen-and-sexting.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2017.
Livingstone, S., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2011). The true prevalence of sexting. Crimes against children research center. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf. Accessed January 25, 2017.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Nwabueze, C., Okoli, E., Onuigbo, U., & Chukwu, E. (2015). Patterns of sexting among Anambra State university students. Review of Communication and Media Studies, 1(2), 106–114.
Oni, O. O. (2012). Sexual discourse among students in selected tertiary institutions in Lagos state, Nigeria. An Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of English, Faculty of Arts, University of Ibadan, i–214.
Rollin, J. (2015). Sexting cyberchildren: Gender, sexuality and childhood in social media and law. Sexuality and Culture, 19, 57–71.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1993). System of transcendental ideas (1800). New York: Trans P. Heath Charlotesville U.P.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.
Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Templesmith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 697–701.
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional pattern, pathologies, and paradoxes. London: WW Norton.
Zygmunt, B. (2000). Liquid modernity. London: Polity press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oni-Buraimoh, O.O., Adeyelure-Macaulay, C.O. Investigating the Language of Sexting on the Social Media and Its Impact on Spousal Relationships in Nigeria. Sexuality & Culture 22, 391–404 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9473-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9473-3