Sex in the Media, Sex on the Mind: Linking Television Use, Sexual Permissiveness, and Sexual Concept Accessibility in Memory

  • Francesca R. Dillman Carpentier
  • Elise M. Stevens
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study explores the interrelationships between emerging adults’ exposure to sexual depictions on mainstream television, their attitudes toward sexually permissive behaviors, and the salience (accessibility) of concepts related to sexual activity in their implicit memory. Findings indicate a small but significant relationship between increased exposure to sex on television and increased favoring of sexually permissive behaviors, when taking sexual concept accessibility into account. When taking television exposure into account, young adults who held stronger sexually permissive attitudes found it easier to access concepts of sexual activity in memory, suggesting these ideas were top-of-mind for these participants, compared to participants scoring lower on permissiveness. However, there was no direct connection between exposure to sex on television and accessibility of sexual activity in memory when accounting for permissive attitudes, suggesting that sexual permissiveness is at the center of any link between exposure and accessibility. Implications for examining sexual permissiveness as a lens for structuring sexual information in memory, as well as implications for designing sexual health messages are discussed in light of the findings.

Keywords

College students Concept accessibility Emerging adults Health behavior and attitudes Mass media Permissiveness Premarital sexuality Sexual attitudes Sexual content Television 

References

  1. Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97(1), 129–133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adefuye, A. S., Abiona, T. C., Balogun, J. A., & Lukobo-Durrell, M. (2009). HIV sexual risk behaviors and perception of risk among college students: Implications for planning interventions. BMC Public Health, 9(1), 281. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aubrey, J. S., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety versus timing: Gender differences in college students’ sxual expectations as predicted by exposure to sexually oriented television. Communication Research, 30(4), 432–460. doi:10.1177/0093650203253365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. doi:10.21500/20112084.807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. D. (2002). Mass media influences on sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 42–45. doi:10.1080/00224490209552118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, J. D., Halpern, C. T., & L’Engle, K. L. (2005). Mass media as a sexual super peer for early maturing girls. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(5), 420–427. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D., L’Engle, K. L., Pardun, C. J., Guo, G., Kenneavy, K., & Jackson, C. (2006). Sexy media matter: Exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts black and white adolescents’ sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1018–1027. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, J. D., & Strasburger, V. C. (2007). From Calvin Klein, to Paris Hilton and MySpace: Adolescents, sex & the media. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 18(3), 484–507.Google Scholar
  11. Calfin, M. S., Carroll, J. L., & Shmidt, J. (1993). Viewing music-videotapes before taking a test of premarital sexual attitudes. Psychological Reports, 72(2), 475–481. doi:10.2466/pr0.1993.72.2.475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandra, A., Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., et al. (2008). Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics, 122(5), 1047–1054. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapin, J. R. (2000). Adolescent sex and mass media: A developmental approach. Adolescence, 35(140), 799–811.Google Scholar
  14. Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150. doi:10.1177/2167696813487181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Collins, R. L. (2005). Sex on television and its impact on American youth: Background and results from the RAND Television and Adolescent Sexuality Study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(3), 371–385. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2005.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins, R. L., Martino, S. C., Elliott, M. N., & Miu, A. (2011). Relationships between adolescent sexual outcomes and exposure to sex in media: Robustness to propensity-based analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 585–591. doi:10.1037/a0022563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Gaston, J. F., Weed, S., & Jensen, L. (1996). Understanding gender differences in adolescent sexuality. Adolescence, 31(121), 217–231.Google Scholar
  19. de Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 253–280. doi:10.1080/14640748408402158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillman Carpentier, F. R., Stevens, E. M., Wu, L., & Seely, N. (2017). Sex, love, and risk-n-responsibility: A content analysis of entertainment television. Mass Communication and Society. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1298807.Google Scholar
  21. Downing-Matibag, T. M., & Geisinger, B. (2009). Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1196–1209. doi:10.1177/1049732309344206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eagley, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Farrar, K. M., Kunkel, D., Biely, E., Eyal, K., Fandrich, R., & Donnerstein, E. (2003). Sexual messages during prime-time programming. Sexuality and Culture, 7(3), 7–37. doi:10.1007/s12119-003-1001-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., & Gruber, E. L. (2004). Sex on American television: An analysis across program genres and network types. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48(4), 529–553. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4804_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fiske, S. T. (2014). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Friedrich, W. N., Fisher, J., Broughton, D., Houston, M., & Shafran, C. R. (1998). Normative sexual behavior in children: A contemporary sample. Pediatrics, 101(4), E9. doi:10.1542/peds.101.4.e9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 192–208. doi:10.1037/h0099345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruber, E. L., & Grube, J. W. (2000). Adolescent sexuality and the media: A review of current knowledge and implications. Western Journal of Medicine, 172(3), 210–214. doi:10.1136/ewjm.172.3.210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Love and sexual attitudes, self-disclosure and sensation seeking. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(3), 281–297. doi:10.1177/026540758700400303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The brief sexual attitudes scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 76–86. doi:10.1080/00224490609552301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kilhstom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Hornor, G. (2004). Sexual behavior in children: Normal or not? Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 18(2), 57–64. doi:10.1016/S0891-5245(03)00154-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204. doi:10.1086/266945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly, M. (2010). Virginity loss narratives in “teen drama” television programs. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 479–489. doi:10.1080/00224490903132044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2007). From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on primetime network television. Journal of Sex Research, 44(2), 145–157. doi:10.1080/00224490701263660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kunkel, D., Farrar, K. M., Eyal, K., Biely, E., Donnerstein, E., & Rideout, V. (2007). Sexual socialization messages on entertainment television: Comparing content trends 1997–2002. Media Psychology, 9(3), 595–622. doi:10.1080/15213260701283210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lam, C. B., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2013). Risky sexual behaviors in emerging adults: Longitudinal changes and within-person variations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 523–532. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9959-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lefkowitz, E. S., & Gillen, M. M. (2006). Sex is just a normal part of life. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 235–255). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lou, C., Cheng, Y., Gao, E., Zuo, X., Emerson, M. R., & Zabin, L. S. (2012). Media’s contribution to sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for adolescents and young adults in three Asian cities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(3), S26–S36. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Marron, H., & Collins, S. (2009). Mass media consumption and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of young adults. Florida Communication Journal, 37(2), 55–70.Google Scholar
  46. Nielsen, (2015). Kids’ audience behavior across platforms. New York: The Nielsen Company.Google Scholar
  47. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26(2), 188–198. doi:10.2307/349726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reiss, I. L. (2011). Reiss premarital sexual permissiveness scale (short form). In T. Fisher, C. Davis, W. Yarber, & S. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality related measures (pp. 509–510). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2007). Media priming. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media theories and processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 53–80). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1991). Construct accessibility: Determinants, consequences, and implications for the media. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 45–62). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  55. Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 124–148. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., Walsh, R., & Anderson, C. (1988). A revision of the Reiss premarital sexual permissiveness scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(3), 821–828. doi:10.2307/352650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strasburger, V. C. (2005). Adolescents, sex, and the media: Oooo, baby, baby—a Q&A. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 16(2), 269–288. doi:10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, E. P., Kruglanski, A. W., & Spiegel, S. (2000). Attitudes as knowledge structures and persuasion as a specific case of subjective knowledge acquisition. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (pp. 59–96). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Timmerman, L. M., Allen, M., Jorgensen, J., Herrett-Skjellum, J., Kramer, M. R., & Ryan, D. J. (2008). A review and meta-analysis examining the relationship of music content with sex, race, priming, and attitudes. Communication Quarterly, 56(3), 303–324. doi:10.1080/01463370802240932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000-2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ward, L. M. (1995). Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(5), 595–615. doi:10.1007/BF01537058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(1), 133–156. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ward, L. M., & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 237–249. doi:10.1080/00224499909551994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482.Google Scholar
  66. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U.S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28(2), 153–224. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Media and JournalismUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.University of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations