Romance, Sexual Attraction, and Women’s Political Ambition: Initial Findings from Two Experiments
This study develops and begins to test the hypothesis that considerations of romance and sexual attractiveness may impede women’s expression of political ambition (in the sense of either interest in holding public office or willingness to disclose such interest). As this is a very new area of research, and as the subject is difficult to test, this study does not draw firm conclusions, but the initial data results suggest at least some support for the hypothesis. It does seem from these two experiments that politics makes one less popular as a date or mate choice, and that women who hypothetically hold office would be less likely to reveal that fact to a potential sexual or romantic partner. Further research is needed to both develop the measurements for this exciting new area of study and confirm these initial results.
KeywordsPolitics Political ambition Public office Romance Sex Sexual attraction Attractiveness Attraction Experiments Dating Holding public office Running for office
The authors offer their sincere thanks to Chelsea Coccia and Annalisa Klein for research assistance and to various graduate advisors in the Harvard and Duke Departments of Government/Political Science.
This study was funded in part through small grants to the authors from their graduate Departments at Harvard and Duke Universities. This research was also supported in part by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Grant 1106401. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. No research grants were received from companies.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, and all instruments were approved by an institutional review board. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Bower, C. L. (2003). Public discourse and female presidential candidates. In R. P. Watson & A. Gordon (Eds.), Anticipating madam president (pp. 107–116). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Current population survey, table 3: employment status of the civilian non-institutional population by age, sex, and race.Google Scholar
- Bursztyn, L., Fujiwaraz, T., & Pallaisx, A. (2017). Acting wife: Marriage market incentives and labor market investments. Working paper. Available online at http://scholar.harvard.edu/pallais/publications/acting-wife-marriage-market-incentives-and-labor-market-investments. Accessed 21 April 2017).
- CAWP (2016). Current numbers of women officeholders. Technical report, Center for American Women and Politics.Google Scholar
- Faludi, S. (2009). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
- Fels, A. (2013). Necessary dreams: Ambition in women’s changing lives. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2001). What is it about Government that Americans Dislike?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kamber, V. (2003). Poison politics: Are negative campaigns destroying democracy?. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2012). Men rule: The continued under-representation of women in US politics. Washington, DC: Women & Politics Institute, American University.Google Scholar
- Nye, J. S., Zelikow, P., & King, D. C. (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Patterson, T. E. (2002). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Political Parity. (2014). Shifting gears: How women navigate the road to higher office. Report by Political Parity, a program of Hunt Alternatives Foundation. Cambridge, MA. Available online at https://www.politicalparity.org/research/shifting-gears/. Accessed 26 April 2017.
- Saad, L. (2013). Gridlock is top reason Americans are critical of congress. Report by Gallup. Available online at http://www.gallup.com/poll/163031/gridlock-top-reason-americans-critical-congress.aspx. Accessed 8 May 2017.
- Shames, S. (2017). Out of the running; Why millennials reject political careers and why it matters. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Talbot, M. (2011). Comment: The public on the private. The New Yorker, 24.Google Scholar