The Religious Origins and Destinations of Individuals Identifying as a Sexual Minority

Abstract

Religion has been, and continues to be, a source of external hostility and internal struggle for many sexual minorities. This has potential implications for the observed religious origins and current religious affiliations of individuals identifying as a sexual minority. Regarding origins, self-identified sexual minorities might be less likely than heterosexuals to have come from religious traditions that have tended to be hostile to minority sexualities, as individuals raised within those traditions might be hesitant to identify as a sexual minority even if they have same-sex attractions. Regarding destinations, self-identified sexual minorities might be more likely than heterosexuals to switch away from religious traditions that have tended to be hostile to minority sexualities. We examine these expectations using nationally representative survey data from the 2008 to 2014 General Social Surveys. The analysis shows that sexual minorities do not significantly differ from heterosexuals by the religious traditions in which they were raised. Sexual minorities are, however, more likely than heterosexuals to move away from Christian traditions and towards disaffiliation or reaffiliation with “other” traditions that include Judaism, Buddhism, and liberal nontraditional religions such as Unitarian Universalism. For gay and lesbian individuals, these patterns of disaffiliation and reaffiliation can be attributed to higher on average education and lower likelihood of being married and having children; however, these sociodemographic factors do not explain the disaffiliation and reaffiliation of bisexual individuals. Further research should explore the different religious experiences of sexual minority sub-groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rodriguez and Ouellette (2000) note four potential outcomes: (1) rejecting the religious identity; (2) rejecting the homosexual identity; (3) compartmentalization; (4) identity integration. We have combined the first two possibilities (rejection of an identity) and the second two (accommodation of both identities) into our descriptions.

  2. 2.

    The 2010 General Social Survey, for example, found that 18.3% of US adults were religiously unaffiliated.

  3. 3.

    Prior to 2008 the GSS had asked about the sex of participants’ past and current sexual partners. Before the inclusion of the sexual identity question, some research (e.g., Sherkat 2002) used these sex partner questions to identify sexual minorities. However, comparing the identity question with the sex partner question shows that they do not perfectly overlap. For instance, 31% of individuals who report a same-sex sex partner in the last five years identify as heterosexual in the 2008–2014 GSS data.

  4. 4.

    Respondents could also offer the response of “don’t know” or refuse to answer. These cases (don’t know n = 25, refused n = 113) are excluded from the analysis.

  5. 5.

    The terms evangelical and mainline generally correspond to terms like “conservative” and “moderate-liberal,” respectively.

  6. 6.

    The divorced and separated categories are distinct in the original survey question, but there were not enough cases in the separated category in the multivariate analyses to keep it as a distinct category.

References

  1. Adamczyk, A., & Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38(2), 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaulieu-Prévost, D., & Fortin, M. (2015). The measurement of sexual orientation: Historical background and current practices. Sexologies, 24(1), e15–e19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckstead, A. L., & Morrow, S. L. (2004). Mormon clients’ experiences of conversion therapy: The need for a new treatment approach. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(5), 651–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bibby, R. W. (1997). Going, going, gone: The impact of geographic mobility on religious involvement. Review of Religious Research, 38(4), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, M., Dzelme, K., Harris, D., & Hecker, L. (2001). Challenges of being simultaneously gay or lesbian and spiritual and/or religious: A narrative perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(5), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Census Bureau. (2016). Current population survey table creator. Accessed at http://www.census.gov/cps/data/cpstablecreator.html.

  7. Dahl, A. L., & Galliher, R. V. (2009). LGBQQ young adult experiences of religious and sexual identity integration. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 3(2), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellison, C. P., & Sherkat, D. E. (1990). Patterns of religious mobility among black Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 31(4), 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellison, C. G., & Sherkat, D. E. (1995). The ‘semi-involuntary institution’ revisited: Regional variation in church participation among black Americans. Social Forces, 73(4), 1415–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finlay, B., & Walther, C. S. (2003). The relation of religious affiliation, service attendance, and other factors to homophobic attitudes among university students. Review of Religious Research, 44(4), 370–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. General Social Survey. (2017). Appendix A: Sampling design & weighting. Accessed at http://gss.norc.org/Documents/codebook/A.pdf on January 24, 2017.

  12. Hadaway, C. K., & Marler, P. L. (1993). All in the family: Religious mobility in America. Review of Religious Research, 35(2), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halderman, D. C. (2004). When sexual and religious orientation collide: Considerations in working with conflicted same-sex attracted male clients. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(5), 691–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henshaw, A. L. (2014). Geographies of tolerance: Human development, heteronormativity, and religion. Sexuality and Culture, 18(4), 959–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herek, G. M., Norton, A. T., Allen, T. J., & Sims, C. L. (2010). Demographic, psychological, and social characteristics of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in a US probability sample. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(3), 176–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hooghe, M., Claes, E., Harell, A., Quintelier, E., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2010). Anti-gay sentiment among adolescents in Belgium and Canada: A comparative investigation into the role of gender and religion. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(3), 384–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobsen, J., & Wright, R. (2014). Mental health implications in Mormon women’s experiences with same-sex attraction: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(5), 664–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeffries, W. L., Dodge, B., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2008). Religion and spirituality among bisexual black men in the USA. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10(5), 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubicek, K., McDavitt, B., Carpineto, J., Weiss, G., Iverson, E. F., & Kipke, M. D. (2009). “God made me gay for a reason” Young men who have sex with men’s resiliency in resolving internalized homophobia from religious sources. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(5), 601–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lapinski, J., & McKirnan, D. (2013). Forgive me Father for I have sinned: The role of a Christian upbringing on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity development. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(6), 853–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levy, D. L., & Reeves, P. (2011). Resolving identity conflict: Gay, lesbian, and queer individuals with Christian upbringing. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 23(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Loveland, M. T. (2003). Religious switching: Preference development, maintenance, and change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahaffy, K. A. (1996). Cognitive dissonance and its resolution: A study of lesbian Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(4), 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller, B. (2016). A computer-mediated escape from the closet: Exploring identity, community, and disinhibited discussion on an Internet coming out advice forum. Sexuality and Culture, 20(3), 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore, L. M., & Ovadia, S. (2006). Accounting for spatial variation in tolerance: The effects of education and religion. Social Forces, 84(4), 2205–2222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (1995). Religious switching for marriage reasons. Sociology of Religion, 56(3), 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Research Council. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pitt, R. N. (2009). ‘Still looking for my Jonathan’: Gay back men’s management of religious and sexual identity conflicts. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pitt, R. N. (2010). ‘Killing the messenger’: Religious black gay men’s neutralization of anti-gay religious messages. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Robertson, M. A. (2014). ‘How do I know I am gay?’: Understanding sexual orientation, identity and behavior among adolescents in an LGBT youth center. Sexuality and Culture, 18(2), 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodriguez, E. M., & Ouellette, S. C. (2000). Gay and lesbian Christians: Homosexual and religious identity integration in the members and participants of a gay-positive church. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Roof, W. C. (1989). Multiple religious switching: A research note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28(4), 530–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Scheitle, C. P., & Hahn, B. (2011). From the pews to policy: Specifying Evangelical Protestantism’s influence on states’ sexual orientation policies. Social Forces, 89(3), 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schuck, K. D., & Liddle, B. J. (2001). Religious conflicts experienced by lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Psychotherapy, 5(2), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwadel, P. (2011). The effects of education on Americans’ religious practices, beliefs, and affiliations. Review of Religious Research, 53(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz, J. P., & Lindley, L. D. (2005). Religious fundamentalism and attachment: Prediction of homophobia. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sherkat, D. E. (1991). Leaving the faith: Testing theories of religious switching using survival models. Social Science Research, 20(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sherkat, D. E. (2002). Sexuality and religious commitment in the United States: An empirical examination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sherkat, D. E., & Cunningham, S. A. (1998). Extending the semi-involuntary institution: Regional differences and social constraints on private religious consumption among African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sherkat, D. E., & Wilson, J. (1995). Preferences, constraints, and choices in religious markets: An examination of religious switching and apostasy. Social Forces, 73(3), 993–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., & Hout, M. (2015). General Social Surveys, 1972–2014 cumulative codebook. Chicago: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, C., & Sikkink, D. (2003). Social predictors of retention in and switching from the religious faith of family of origin: Another look using religious tradition self-identification. Review of Religious Research, 45(2), 188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith, C., Sikkink, D., & Bailey, J. (1998). Devotion in Dixie and beyond: A test of the ‘Shibley thesis’ on the effects of regional origin and migration on individual religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3), 494–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Swanson, D. J. (2004). The framing of contemporary Christian apostasy on the World Wide Web. Journal of Media and Religion, 3(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Szymanski, D. M., Kashubeck-West, S., & Meyer, J. (2008). Internalized heterosexism: Measurement, psychosocial correlates, and research directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(4), 525–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Thumma, S. (1991). Negotiating a religious identity: The case of the gay evangelical. Sociology of Religion, 52(4), 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Whitehead, A. L. (2010). Sacred rites and civil rights: Religion’s effect on attitudes toward same-sex unions and the perceived cause of homosexuality. Social Science Quarterly, 91(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wilcox, M. W. (2002). When Sheila’s a lesbian: Religious individualism among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 63(4), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive funding to conduct this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. Scheitle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Scheitle declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Wolf declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The data used in this research come from the General Social Survey (GSS), which is publicly available at gss.norc.org. Informed consent is obtained from all GSS participants. This research is in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheitle, C.P., Wolf, J.K. The Religious Origins and Destinations of Individuals Identifying as a Sexual Minority. Sexuality & Culture 21, 719–740 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9417-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Disaffiliation
  • Identity conflict
  • LGB
  • Religious affiliation
  • Sexual minorities