Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 627–642 | Cite as

Dual Contradictory Effects of Self-Objectification on Sexual Satisfaction

  • Meysam H. Barzoki
  • Osmo Kontula
  • Hossein Mokhtariaraghi
  • Nasimosadat Mahboubishariatpanahi
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectification theory provides an explanatory conceptual framework for describing women’s lived experiences. The goal of this study was to examine the relations between media consumption, self-sexualizing behavior, and sexual satisfaction within the objectification framework. Responses from a sample of 298 married Iranian women, chosen using multistage and cluster sampling methods, were collected to explore this relationship. The results revealed that while most of the variables had a negative effect on sexual satisfaction, self-sexualizing behavior had a positive effect. The link between media consumption and sexual satisfaction was mediated by body shame and self-sexualizing behavior. Media consumption, body surveillance, and body shame were positively associated with self-sexualizing behavior and accounted for approximately 24% of its variance. Discussion focuses on the contradictory effect of self-objectification and self-sexualizing behavior on sexual satisfaction.

Keywords

Media consumption Body surveillance Body shame Self-sexualizing behavior Sexual satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank Professor Tavakol of the University of Tehran for his significant influence in forming the theoretical aspect of our work and his great help in improving the present study through his informative review. Also, many researchers in the department of Social Science and Business Studies at the University of Eastern Finland have been very helpful during different stages of this study and must be greatly thanked. Our special thanks goes to the participating women, living in the religious context of Iran, who put their trust in the project and the researcher and reported some intimate details of their private lives.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relating financial or personal relationships that may bias the work.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all women who participated in the study.

References

  1. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexual-objectification of Girls. (2010). Report of the APA task force on the sexual-objectification of girls. http://www.apa.org/pi/women/ programs/girls/report-full.pdf.
  2. Baber, K. M., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to Measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54, 459–467. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannon, W. M. (2013). The 7 Steps of Data Analysis: A Manual for Conducting a Quantitative Analysis. New York: Statewhisperer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barzoki, M. H., Mohtasham, L., Shahidi, M., & Tavakol, M. (2016). Self-objectification and self-sexualization behavior within consumer culture. Applied Research Quality Life. doi: 10.1007/s11482-016-9468-5.Google Scholar
  5. Bay-Chen, L. Y., Livingston, J. A., & Fava, N. M. (2012). “Not always a clear path”: Making space for peers, adults, and complexity in adolescent girls’ sexual development. In E. L. Zurbriggen & T. A. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualizing of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance (pp. 257–277). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, B. T., & Dittmar, H. (2011). Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the impact of different thin-ideal media on body image. Sex Roles, 65, 478–490. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9964-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6(2), 145–148. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claudat, K., & Warren, C. S. (2014). Self-objectification, body self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college women. Body Image, 11(4), 509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claudat, K., Warren, C. S., & Durette, R. T. (2012). The relationships between body surveillance, body shame, and contextual body concern during sexual activities in ethnically diverse female college students. Body Image, 9, 448–454. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordero, E. D. (2011). Self-esteem, social support, collectivism, and the thin-ideal in Latina undergraduates. Body Image, 8(1), 82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinarvand, R. (2014). Annual Iranian cosmetics bill at $2b. Iran-daily news. http://www.iran-daily.com/News/57023.html.
  12. Dittmar, H. (2008). Consumer culture, identity, and well-being: the search for the “good life” and “body perfect”. European Monographs in Social Psychology. London: Psychology press.Google Scholar
  13. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). The mediating role of appearance comparisons in the relationship between media usage and self-objectification in young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/0361684315581841.Google Scholar
  14. Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, image and affect in consumer culture. Body & Society, 16(1), 193–221. doi: 10.1177/1357034X09354357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the “sexualizing of culture” debates. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 736–745. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grippo, K. P., & Hill, M. S. (2008). Self-objectification, habitual body monitoring, and body dissatisfaction in older European American women: Exploring age and feminism as moderators. Body Image., 5(2), 173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26, 499–518. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcq014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hakim, Catherine. (2011). Honey money: The power of erotic capital. London: Allen lone.Google Scholar
  21. Harper, B., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on womens self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 649–657. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9379-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual- and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(5), 745–776. doi: 10.1177/0011000007301669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iannaccone, M., D’Olimpio, F., Cella, S., & Cotrufo, P. (2016). Self-esteem, body shame and eating disorder risk in obese and normal weight adolescents: A mediation model. Eating Behaviors, 21, 80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jannati, A. (2013). When 71 per cent of Iranians watching satellite. TABNAK: Professional News Site(Persian). http://www.tabnak.ir/fa/news/365680/.
  25. Lance, L. (2006). Searching for love and sex: A review and analysis of mainstream and explicit personal ads. In T. Reichert & J. Lambiase (Eds.), Sex in consumer culture: The erotic content of media and marketing (pp. 337–351). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2009). “Bad Girls Rule”: An interdisciplinary feminist commentary on the report of the APA Task Force on the sexualizing of girls. Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 250–263. doi: 10.1080/00224490903079542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark, K. P., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, J. D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). A Psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 159–169. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.816261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCutcheon, J., & Morrison, M. A. (2015). The effect of parental gender roles on students’ attitudes toward lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive couples. Journal Adoption Quarterly. doi: 10.1080/10926755.2014.945702.Google Scholar
  29. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moradi, B. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist., 39(1), 153–163. doi: 10.1177/0011000010384279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosavian, S. M. (2016). 53 per cent of Iranians are member of social media. Mehr News Agency (Persian). http://www.mehrnews.com/news/3721091/.
  32. Myers, T. A., & Crowther, J. H. (2007). Sociocultural pressures, thin-ideal internalization, self-objectification, and body dissatisfaction: Could feminist beliefs be a moderating factor? Body Image, 4, 296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 95–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01477.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pardun, C. J., & Forde, K. R. (2006). Sexual content of television commercials watched by early adolescents. In T. Reichert & J. Lambiase (Eds.), Sex in consumer culture: The erotic content of media and marketing (pp. 125–139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Human Communication Research, 35(2), 171–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pidgeon, A., & Harker, R. A. (2013). Body-focused anxiety in women: Associations with internalization of the thin-ideal, dieting frequency, body mass index and media effects. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 2(4B), 17–24. doi: 10.4236/ojmp.2013.24B004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pujols, J., Meston, C. M., & Seal, B. N. (2009). The association between sexual satisfaction and body image in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 905–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01604.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez, D., & Kiefer, A. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 808–820. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9205-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sánchez-Fuentes, M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 67–75. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Satinsky, S., Reece, M., Dennis, B., Sanders, S., & Bardzell, S. (2012). An assessment of body appreciation and its relationship to sexual function in women. Body Image, 9, 137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K., & Myers, T. A. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college women and men think about and do to be “sexy”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 379–397. doi: 10.1177/0361684314524168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 205–225. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stulhofer, A., Busko, V., & Brouillard, P. (2010). Development and bicultural validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Sex Research, 47(4), 257–268. doi: 10.1080/00224490903100561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stulhofer, A., Busko, V., & Brouillard, P. (2011). The new sexual satisfaction scale and its short form. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 530–532). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Szalai, I. (2015) Market focus: Beauty growth dynamics in the middle East and Turkey. http://blog.euromonitor.com/2015/04/market-focus-beauty-growth-dynamics-in-the-middle-east-and-turkey.html.
  46. Tylka, T. L., & Sabik, N. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 18–31. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9785-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girl’s internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 869–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2014). The three-step process of self-objectification: Potential implications for adolescents’ body consciousness during sexual activity. Body Image, 11(1), 77–80. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woerner, J., & Abbey, A. (2016). Positive feelings after casual sex: The role of gender and traditional gender-role beliefs. The Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1208801.Google Scholar
  50. Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meysam H. Barzoki
    • 1
  • Osmo Kontula
    • 2
  • Hossein Mokhtariaraghi
    • 3
  • Nasimosadat Mahboubishariatpanahi
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  2. 2.Population Research InstituteFamily Federation of FinlandHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Clinical PsychologyIslamic University of GarmsarGarmsarIran
  4. 4.Tarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations