I present a subcultural analysis of the Italian Bondage, Domination, Sadism and Masochism (BDSM) community based on recent empirical findings. The research involved over 1 year of participant observation into the BDSM community of Milan and 43 interviews with members or key witnesses. Throughout the article, I explore the heuristic value of the category of subculture in highlighting important features of BDSM groups. Subcultures are intended as formed by: (1) norms, behaviours, narratives, and artefacts that circulate in a group, and (2) a sense of identification, or subcultural participation in a community. I then present four ideal types of BDSM practitioners based on the degrees of subcultural identification with the group and of display of BDSM-identification throughout practitioners’ everyday life. Some empirical examples are provided. In addition, I describe the formation of the BDSM subculture in Italy in the last 40 years as recollected by long-term members and key witnesses. Besides, I discuss its most recent developments. A subcultural analysis of BDSM groups allows the identification of group elements like power structures and shifting roles, and the different degrees of emotional and cultural involvement of social actors in the group.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
At least until DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association 2000) sexual sadism and masochism are categorised as mental conditions. By reading the last edition of the Manual, DSM 5, it appears that sadism and masochism have been excluded from this list when not accompanied by distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning (American Psychiatric Association 2013).
It would be more precise to speak about subcultures (plural) instead of a singular subculture, in the opinion of Langdridge and Butt: “There is no homogeneous S&M culture, but a heterogeneity that becomes increasingly apparent as sexual stories elaborate and proliferate in the late modern world” (Langdridge and Butt, 2005). Fine and Kleinman (1979) in fact, underline that subcultures are not internally homogeneous. Langdridge and Butt underline, though, the relation between an internal heterogeneity and the importance of personal narratives (especially coming out narratives), which are pointed out in detail by Plummer (1995).
Nevertheless, in 2011 the journal “Deviant Behavior” featured an article focused on BDSM practices.
To reconstruct the history of the development of the Italian BDSM scene I have to account for the problem of sources, since academic research on the topic does not really exist—except two small cases, a theoretical paper (Landi 2011) and a small piece of online empirical research by Faccio et al. (2014)—and there are few eye witnesses of the early days. I had to rely on key informants and on the memory of long-time members of the scene. Hence, the information collected could be fragmentary, incomplete and locally-focused.
Among the most cited erotic comics there are Isabella, Biancaneve, Zora la Vampira, Lando, Sukia, L’Uomo Supposta, Vartan and Satanik (Brumatti 2011; Malcolm, male, submissive, 2013; Sybil, female, mistress, 2014). Note: when names, and not surnames, are indicated as references between parenthesis and followed by gender, BDSM role, and year, they refer to research participants interviewed for the research (e.g. Garrett, male, switch, 2013).
Among them, I Moderni, SM and Club (Brumatti 2011; Malcolm, male, submissive, 2013). The first BDSM elements represented by pictures were models wearing latex and involved in rope bondage sessions (Malcolm 2013).
Poste restante is a service where the post office holds mail until the recipient calls for it.
Some ads were hosted on the still existing magazine Secondamano, dedicated to buying and selling used items or hosting job announcements (Malcolm, male, submissive, 2013).
Periodical happy hours, or munches, were held at Trezzo sull’Adda and Mortara, the area of Porta Romana and Porta Genova in Milan (Lombardia), Mestre (Veneto), and Bologna (Emilia-Romagna) (David, male, submissive, 2013; Malcolm, male, submissive, 2013). Since the 2000 s, the "Kinky Pop”, born in 2013, and the older “First Fridays” have been the most famous munches in Milan.
Some happy hours, such as “La Chattina”, “Legami” and “Fetlife”, were born around the online communities of some BDSM-themed social media (Peter, male, switch, 2013; Quianna, female, dominant sadist, 2014).
Names, and not surnames, indicated as references between parenthesis and followed by gender, BDSM role, and year refer to BDSM practitioner interviewed for the research (e.g. Garrett, male, switch, 2013).
A famous periodical ‘femdom’ play party held in Milan was “Il Piedistallo”, named probably after the famous Club Pedestal in London; other series of femdom play parties were organised by the community of Femdom Italia and by specific mistresses, like the “Bacaro Sadico” party. Some unique events, never repeated, have been organised in Milan, like the “Secret Fetish Party” and “Revolution” (Red, male, master, 2014). A few bars, near the crowded Navigli neighbourhood in the city centre, organised BDSM events; some of the performances there attracted several people into the club, dragged from the surrounding streets, including curious non-BDSM practitioners. Furthermore, in Milan some discotheques organised and organise BDSM-themed events, such as the fetish night at the “Hollywood”, the one at the “Depot” or at the “Black Hole”. Other discotheques hosted specific events, such as corset fashion shows. “Feetaly” was a fetish community centred around the foot fetish which existed during the first 2000s and has now disappeared. Nowadays, several BDSM play parties are held in Milan, like “Sadistique”, “L’Ultimo Lunedì”, “Makabra”; other are in central Italy, like the one organised at the “Tref Point" (Emilia-Romagna) (Malcolm, male, missive, 2013; Maud, female, mistress, 2013; Red, male, master, 2014; Sybil, female, mistress, 2014). The website Sadicamente, www.sadicamente.com, recently started to list the BDSM parties and events taking place in Italy; in addition, a search engine for locating BDSM parties and events is available through the social network Fetlife, www.fetlife.com.
Fetlife is the “BDSM and fetish community for kinksters by kinksters”, a social network widely used by BDSM practitioners. Before that, some mailing lists were present in the first 2000s with the aim of discussing BDSM issues and meeting new partners (Garrett, male, switch, 2013).
I am using the word ‘dominant’ as a synonym for master, mistress, and top, and ‘submissive’ as a synonym for slave and bottom. I am aware that I am not considering the shades and the differences among the terms, which nevertheless vary among communities and countries. For the sake of this article, I will be using dominant and submissive as all-encompassing terms.
Shibari is like what is labelled ‘rope bondage’, being physically tied by ropes, yet with a strong focus on the relationship between the two players as mediated by ropes.
Not all the BDSM practitioners interviewed and/or involved in the research have been represented.
I am obviously omitting his name because in this context is not relevant.
Here, I am drawing a comparison between BDSM and the disclosure of one’s non-heterosexual sexual orientation. I refer in particular to Troiden, who stated the many reasons that could prevent a person to come out in a work environment (Troiden, 1989). One of them is to have a highly-qualified job, which after a coming out could either be lost or endangered.
Alison, L., Santtila, P., Sandnabba, N. K., & Nordling, N. (2001). Sadomasochistically oriented behavior: Diversity in practice and meaning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(1), 1–12.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or neo-tribes? Rethinking the relationship between youth, style and musical taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617.
Breslow, N., Evans, L., & Langley, J. (1985). On the prevalence and roles of females in the sadomasochistic subculture: Report of an empirical study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(4), 303–317.
Brumatti, F. (2011). 30 ANNI DI STORIA BDSM in Italia (1980–2010). Retrieved from www.gabbia.com/boudoir/04/01/2011/30-anni-di-storia-bdsm-in-italia-1980-%E2%80%93-2010/.
Dalzell, T. (2009). The Routledge dictionary of modern American slang and unconventional English. New York: Routledge.
Dalzell, T., & Victor, T. (2008). The concise new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional English. London, New York: Routledge.
Dean, T. (2009). Unlimited intimacy. Reflections on the subculture of barebacking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dymock, A. (2014). Towards a consent culture: An interview with Kitty Stryker. Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics & Politics, 2(1), 75–91.
Faccio, E., Casini, C., & Cipolletta, S. (2014). Forbidden games: The construction of sexuality and sexual pleasure by BDSM ‘players’. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(7), 752–764.
Fine, G. A., & Kleinman, S. (1979). Rethinking subculture: An interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 85(1), 1–20.
Gelder, K. (2007). Subcultures: Cultural histories and social practice. London, New York: Routledge.
Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth: Identity, style, and subculture. Oxford, New York: Berg.
Krueger, R. (2010a). The DSM diagnostic criteria for sexual masochism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(2), 346–356.
Krueger, R. (2010b). The DSM diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(2), 325–345.
Landi, N. (2011). BDSM. Ars erotica tra dolore e piacere. Rivista Di Sessuologia, 35(4), 261–267.
Langdridge, D., & Barker, M. (2007). Safe, sane, and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Langdridge, D., & Butt, T. (2005). The erotic construction of power exchange. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(1), 65–73.
Maffesoli, M. (1988). Le temp des Tribus: le déclin de líndividualisme dans les sociétés de masse. Paris: Klincksieck.
Magaudda, P. (2009). Ridiscutere le sottoculture. Resistenza simbolica, postmodernismo e disuguaglianze sociali. Studi Culturali, 6(2), 301–314.
Mains, G. (1984). Urban aboriginals: A celebration of leathersexuality. San Francisco: Gay Sunshine.
Moser, C., & Levitt, E. E. (1987). An exploratory-descriptive study of a sadomasochistically oriented sample. Journal of Sex Research, 23(3), 322–337.
Newmahr, S. (2010a). Power struggles: Pain and authenticity in SM play. Symbolic Interaction, 33(3), 389–411.
Newmahr, S. (2010b). Rethinking kink: Sadomasochism as serious leisure. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 313–331.
Newmahr, S. (2011). Playing on the edge Sadomasochism, risk, and intimacy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change, and social worlds. London, New York: Routledge.
Redhead, S. (1993). Rave off: Politics and deviance in contemporary youth culture. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
Ritchie, A., & Barker, M. (2005). Feminist SM: A contradiction in terms or a way of challenging traditional gendered dynamics through sexual practice? Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 6(3), 227–239.
Sandnabba, N. K., Santtila, P., & Nordling, N. (1999). Sexual behavior and social adaptation among sadomasochistically-oriented males. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 273–282.
Santoro, M., & Sassatelli, R. (2008). Lavoro simbolico e immaginazione etnografica. Intervista a Paul Willis. Studi Culturali, 2, 241–272.
Santoro, M., & Sassatelli, R. (2009). Introduzione. In M. Santoro & R. Sassatelli (Eds.), Studiare la cultura. Nuove prospettive sociologiche (pp. 9–54). Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sisson, K. (2005). The cultural formation of S/M: History and analysis. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 6(3), 147–162.
Spengler, A. (1977). Manifest sadomasochism of males: Results of an empirical study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6(6), 441–456.
Stein, D. (2002). ‘Safe Sane Consensual’. The making of a Shibboleth. VASM scene (The newsletter of vancouver activists), September/October, pp. 1–8.
Switch, G. (2001, May). Origin of RACK: RACK vs. SSC. Prometheus #37. New York: The Eulenspiegel Society (TES). http://www.evilmonk.org/a/rack.cfm.
Troiden, R. (1989). The formation of homosexual identities. Journal of Homosexuality, 17(1–2), 43–74.
von Krafft-Ebing, R. (1886). Psychopathia sexualis. Eine Klinisch-Forensische Studie. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke.
Watters, E. (2003). Urban tribes: A generation redefines friendship, family, and commitment. New York: Bloomsbury.
Weiss, M. D. (2011). Techniques of pleasure: BDSM and the circuits of sexuality. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zambelli, L. (2016). Feminism and BDSM: Empirical findings and theoretical debates in US, UK and Italy. INSEP–Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics & Politics (forthcoming).
Conflict of interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
See Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zambelli, L. Subcultures, Narratives and Identification: An Empirical Study of BDSM (Bondage, Domination and Submission, Discipline, Sadism and Masochism) Practices in Italy. Sexuality & Culture 21, 471–492 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9400-z