Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 423–440 | Cite as

Abuse Porn: Reading Reactions to Boys Halfway House

Original Paper

Abstract

Boys Halfway House is a gay bareback pornography website that purports to host the recorded abuse exploits of managers of a halfway house. It is a recent addition to the genre niche of abuse and exploitation pornography sites that have surfaced in recent years. This article reads viewer commentary of scene updates on review site WayBig.com so as to consider the controversy associated with the proliferation of gay ‘abuse porn’, and of Boys Halfway House and its theme in particular. More than 500 comments over a 2-year period help explain Boys Halfway House as a variant of extreme pornography, and canvas a range of views on rape and humiliation fantasy in gay porn more broadly. The study ends with discussion of the anxieties and appreciations the site has prompted in viewers, and the presentation of two themes in particular: ‘bad porn’ and ‘harmful porn’. Also considered are the ethical implications of such male sexual abuse fantasies, which is a subject of lasting trauma for victims, and one that poses unique challenges in wider contexts.

Keywords

Abuse porn Boys Halfway House Cultural studies Discourse Extreme porn Gay pornography Textual analysis 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Joseph Brennan declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Attwood, F. (2014). Immersion: ‘Extreme’ texts, animated bodies and the media. Media, Culture and Society, 36(8), 1186–1195. doi: 10.1177/0163443714544858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attwood, F., & Smith, C. (2010). Extreme concern: Regulating ‘dangerous pictures’ in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society, 37(1), 171–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00500.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, M. (2014). The ‘problem’ with sexual fantasies. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 143–160. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1989). Sade, Fourier, Loyola (R. Miller, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, J. (2016a). ‘Bare-backing spoils everything. He’s spoiled goods’: Disposal and disgust, a study of retired power bottom twink Jake Lyons. Porn Studies, 3(1), 20–33. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2015.1074867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, J. (2016b). ‘Shouldn’t Tom Daley be a bottom?’: Homosexual stereotyping online. Sexualities, 19(7), 853–868. doi: 10.1177/1363460716638089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, J. (2016c). The ‘gonzo aesthetic’ in gay porn: Fraternity X and Sketchy Sex. Porn Studies. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2016.1241156.Google Scholar
  8. Burke, N. B. (2016). Straight-acting: Gay pornography, heterosexuality, and hegemonic masculinity. Porn Studies, 3(3), 238–254. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2016.1196117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, A. (1978). The Sadeian woman and the ideology of pornography. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, S. T. M. (2014). The lens of masculinity: Trauma in men and the landscapes of sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 23(3–4), 239–255. doi: 10.1080/15313204.2014.932733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creeber, G. (2006). The joy of text?: Television and textual analysis. Critical Studies in Television, 1(1), 81–88. doi: 10.7227/CST.1.1.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dauphinée, E. (2007). The politics of the body in pain: Reading the ethics of imagery. Security Dialogue, 38(2), 139–155. doi: 10.1177/0967010607078529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durkheim, É. (2008). The elementary forms of the religious life (J. W. Swain, Trans.). Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Dworkin, A., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1985). The reasons why: Essays on the new civil rights law recognizing pornography as sex discrimination. New York: Women Against Pornography.Google Scholar
  15. Fürsich, E. (2009). In defense of textual analysis: Restoring a challenged method for journalism and media studies. Journalism Studies, 10(2), 238–252. doi: 10.1080/14616700802374050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hocquenghem, G. (1993). Homosexual desire. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hoppe, T. (2011). Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men’s bottom narratives. Sexualities, 14(2), 193–217. doi: 10.1177/1363460711399033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, M. (2016). Racial homophily and homogeneity as post-racial commodification in BoysStraightBoys.tv. In R. H. Kylo-Patrick (Ed.), Queer TV in the 21st century: Essays on broadcasting from taboo to acceptance (pp. 178–193). Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, S. (2013a). The lexicon of offence: The meanings of torture, porn, and ‘torture porn’. In F. Attwood, V. Campbell, I. Q. Hunter, & S. Lockyer (Eds.), Controversial images: Media representations on the edge (pp. 186–200). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, S. (2013b). ‘Why are you crying? Aren’t you having fun?’: Extreme porn. In Torture porn: Popular horror after Saw (pp. 150–169). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, S. (2016). ‘Extreme’ porn? The implications of a label. Porn Studies, 3(3), 295–307. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2016.1196011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, S., & Mowlabocus, S. (2009). Hard times and rough rides: The legal and ethical impossibilities of researching ‘shock’ pornographies. Sexualities, 12(5), 613–628. doi: 10.1177/1363460709340371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kendall, C. N. (2004). Gay male pornography and sexual violence: A sex equality perspective on gay male rape and partner abuse. McGill Law Journal, 49(4), 877–923.Google Scholar
  24. Kendall, C. N., & Funk, R. E. (2004). Gay male pornography “actors”: When “fantasy” isn’t. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2(3–4), 93–114. doi: 10.1300/J189v02n03_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kipnis, L. (1996). Bound and gagged: Pornography and the politics of fantasy in America. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lockwood, D. (2009). All stripped down: The spectacle of “torture porn”. Popular Communication, 7(1), 40–48. doi: 10.1080/15405700802587232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makin, D. A., & Morczek, A. L. (2015). The dark side of internet searches: A macro level assessment of rape culture. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 9(1), 1–23. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.22057.Google Scholar
  28. Makin, D. A., & Morczek, A. L. (2016). X views and counting: Interest in rape-oriented pornography as gendered microaggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2131–2155. doi: 10.1177/0886260515573572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mercer, J. (2012). Power bottom: Performativity in commercial gay pornographic video. In C. Hines & D. Kerr (Eds.), Hard to swallow: Hard-core pornography on screen (pp. 215–228). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nielsen, E.-J., & Kiss, M. (2015). Sexercising our opinion on porn: A virtual discussion. Psychology & Sexuality, 6(1), 118–139. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2014.984518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petley, J. (2009). Pornography, panopticism and the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. Sociology Compass, 3(3), 417–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00212.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reilly, A. (2016). Top or bottom: A position paper. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(3), 167–176. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2015.1135182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romano, E., & De Luca, R. V. (2001). Male sexual abuse: A review of effects, abuse characteristics, and links with later psychological functioning. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(1), 55–78. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(99)00011-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rubin, G. (1993). Misguided, dangerous and wrong: An analysis of anti-pornography politics. In A. Assister & A. Carol (Eds.), Bad girls and dirty pictures: The challenge to reclaim feminism (pp. 18–40). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sire, Z. (2013). Bel Ami tries to appease racist Bel Ami members who hate black people by reminding them that Austin Merrick isn’t actually a “full” black. TheSword.com. http://thesword.com/bel-ami-tries-to-appease-racist-bel-ami-members-who-hate-black-people-by-reminding-them-that-austin-merrick-isnt-actually-a-full-black-person.html. Accessed 8 Sept 2016.
  37. Stardust, Z. (2014). ‘Fisting is not permitted’: Criminal intimacies, queer sexualities and feminist porn in the Australian legal context. Porn Studies, 1(3), 242–259. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2014.928463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sullivan, R., & McKee, A. (2015). Pornography governance and sexual citizenship. In Pornography: Structures, agency and performance (pp. 127–152). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tibbals, C. A. (2014). Gonzo, trannys, and teens—current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 127–135. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker, S., Temple-Smith, M., Higgs, P., & Sanci, L. (2015). ‘It’s always just there in your face’: Young people’s views on porn. Sexual Health, 12(3), 200–206. doi: 10.1071/SH14225.Google Scholar
  41. Whitworth, S. (2004). Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  42. Wilkinson, E. (2011). ‘Extreme pornography’ and the contested spaces of virtual citizenship. Social and Cultural Geography, 12(5), 493–508. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.589535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams, L. (2014). Pornography, porno, porn: Thoughts on a weedy field. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 24–40. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media and Communications, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations