Advertisement

Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 464–492 | Cite as

Hooking Up as an Individualistic Practice: A Double-Edged Sword for College Women

  • Meg C. LovejoyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

An increasingly large body of literature on the casual sex practice, hooking up, has documented that it tends to yield a wide range of positive and negative outcomes for college women. However, no research exists that provides an integrated explanation of these divergent outcomes. One recent influential attempt to highlight the benefits of hooking up for college women has implied that the individualistic character of the practice facilitates these positive outcomes. By contrast, the research here illuminates how the costs of hooking up can also be the result of its individualism (in addition to the commonly identified cause of gender inequality). The article presents the results of in-depth qualitative interviews with 30 college women from diverse backgrounds concerning their hookup experiences. The data suggest that the individualistic norms of hooking up (in combination with gender inequality) may be core contributors to the problems women can experience in the practice. Thus, the research identifies the individualism of hooking up as a “double-edged sword” for college women, potentially facilitating the costs, not just the benefits. It is claimed that this discovery contributes to a more holistic perspective than currently exists concerning the effects of hooking up on young women.

Keywords

College students Premarital sex Health behaviors Women’s sexuality Individualism Gender roles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special acknowledgment is due to Jonathan Martin for his insights and support in the development of this manuscript. Thanks also to Robin Ohringer for her helpful comments.

Conflict of interest

The author of this article, Meg Lovejoy, declares that she has no conflict of interest. I have full control of all primary data, and I will allow Sexuality and Culture to review the data if necessary.

Ethical standard

This article is based on research I completed for my doctoral dissertation at Brandeis University. My thesis research was fully approved by the Brandeis Institutional Review Board. All research participants gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in this study.

References

  1. Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2014). “It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties”: Race, class, and residence in college student negotiations of hooking up. Sociological Perspectives, 57(1), 102–123. doi: 10.1177/0731121413516608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APA. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2010a). Orgasm in college hookups and relationships. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010b). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9(3), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bersamin, M. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Schwartz, S. J., Donnellan, M. B., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R. S., et al. (2013). Risky business: Is there and association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 43–51.Google Scholar
  8. Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2007). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. (2010). To hook up or date? Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Hill, T. D., & Glenn, N. D. (2009). “Hooking up” at college: Does religion make a difference? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(3), 535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, P. H. (2004). Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2007). “It’s less work for us and it shows us she has good taste”: Masculinity, sexual initiation, and contemporary sexual scripts. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having “friends with benefits” emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(4), 231–237. doi: 10.1363/4123109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. England, P., & Reuben, T. J. (2006). The decline of the date and the rise of the college hookup. In A. S. Skolnick & H. J. Skolnick (Eds.), Families in transition (14th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, S. S., Turner, R. A., & Araujo, K. (1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1105–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fielder, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2014). Sexual hookups and adverse health outcomes: A longitudinal study of first-year college women. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 131–144. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.848255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, M. L., Worth, K., Garcia, J. R., & Meredith, T. (2012). Feelings of regret following uncommitted sexual encounters in Canadian university students. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. N., et al. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students—Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freitas, D. (2008). Sex and the Soul: Juggling sexuality, spirituality, romance, and religion on America’s College Campuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Freitas, D. (2013). The end of sex: How hookup culture is leaving a generation unhappy, sexually unfulfilled, and confused about intimacy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. New York: An Institute for American Values Report to the Independent Women’s Forum.Google Scholar
  26. Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12(9/10), 1041–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grello, C., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112.Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahn, A. S., Fricker, K., Hoffman, J., Lambert, T., Tripp, M., & Childress, K. (2000). Hooking up: Dangerous new dating method? In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  31. Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative? Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz, J., Tirone, V., & van der Kloet, E. (2012). Moving in and hooking up: Women’s and men’s casual sexual experiences during the first two months of college. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 15.Google Scholar
  33. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  34. Kimmel, M., & Kalish, R. (2008, July) Hookups and masculinity among college students: Evidence from the college social life survey. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, S. J., & Vaught, S. (2003). You can never be too rich or too thin: Popular and consumer culture and the Americanization of Asian American girls and young women. The Journal of Negro Education, 72(4), 457–478.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behaviors and emotional reactions among US college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(2), 1219–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lyons, H. A., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2014). Young adult casual sexual behavior: Life-course-specific motivations and consequences. Sociological Perspectives, 57(1), 79–101. doi: 10.1177/0731121413517557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McClintock, E. A. (2008, July) Are love and lust both blind? Differences in racial and ethnic homophily in hookups and long-term relationships. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Monahan, K. C., & Lee, J. M. (2008). Adolescent sexual activity: Links between relational context and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(8), 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archive of Sexual Behaviors, 40, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. M. (2008). “Hooking Up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 1050. doi: 10.1107/s8-008-9414-1.Google Scholar
  42. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(5), 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paul, E. L., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2008). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  45. Penhollow, T., Young, M., & Bailey, W. (2007). Relationship between religiosity and “hooking up” behavior. American Journal of Health Education, 38, 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York City: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Reid, J. A., Elliot, S., & Webber, G. R. (2011). Casual hookups to formal dates: Refining the boundaries of the sexual double standard. Gender & Society, 25(5), 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers, S. M., Miller, H. G., Miller, W. C., Zenilman, J. M., & Turner, C. F. (2002). NAAT-identified and self-reported gonorrhea and chlamydial infections. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29(10), 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seal, D. W., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2007). Miscommunications and misinterpretations: Men’s scripts about sexual communication and unwanted sex in interactions with women. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts. Nashville: University of Vanderbilt Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sperber, M. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  51. Tanfer, K., Cubbins, L. A., & Billy, J. O. G. (1995). Gender, race, class and self-reported sexually transmitted disease incidence. Family Planning Perspectives, 27(5), 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Testa, M., Hoffman, J., & Livingston, J. (2010). Alcohol and sexual risk behaviors as mediators of the sexual victimization-revictimization relationship. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tolman, D. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement—An evolutionary interpretation of sex-differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24(2), 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Townsend, J. M., Kline, J., & Wasserman, T. H. (1995). Low-investment copulation—Sex-differences in motivations and emotional-reactions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. US Department of Justice. (2000). The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  57. Ven, T. V., & Beck, J. (2009). Getting drunk and hooking up: An exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 626–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade, L., & Heldman, C. (2012). Hooking up and opting out: Negotiating sex in the first year of college. In L. M. Carpenter & J. DeLamater (Eds.), Sex for life: From virginity through Viagra, how sex changes throughout our lives (pp. 128–145). New York City: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, L. R., & Adams, H. L. (2013). Parties, drugs, and high school hookups: socioemotional challenges for European and Mexican American adolescents. Affilia Journal of Women and Social Work, 28, 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social WelfareAugustana CollegeRock IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations