Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Gendered Attitudes Relate to Women’s and Men’s Sexual Behaviors and Beliefs

Sexuality & Culture volume 18, pages 833–846 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examines associations between endorsement of a sexual double standard, gender role attitudes, and sexual behaviors and beliefs. First year university students in the northeastern United States (N = 434; 52 % female; 33 % Black, 29 % Latino, 39 % White; ages 17–19) participated during their first year of college. Endorsement of a sexual double standard was associated with more conventionally gender-stereotyped sexual behaviors and beliefs, specifically, more sexual partners and fewer perceived barriers to condom use for young men, and more perceived barriers to condom use for young women. Women who were more conventional about men’s roles in society tended to use condoms less, whereas women who were more conventional about women’s roles tended to use condoms more. Men who were more conventional about men’s roles tended to have fewer sexual partners. Findings suggest the importance of examining gender’s role in sexual behaviors and beliefs by assessing multiple gendered attitudes, rather than simply considering biological sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power: Considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. American Psychologist, 50, 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basen-Engquist, K., Masse, L., Coyle, K., Parcel, G. S., Banspach, S., Kirby, D., et al. (1999). Validity of scales measuring the psychosocial determinants of HIV/STD-related risk behavior in adolescents. Health Education Research, 14, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersamin, M. M., Fisher, D. A., Walker, S., Hill, D. L., & Grube, J. W. (2007). Defining virginity and abstinence: Adolescents’ interpretations of sexual behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., & Fisher, W. A. (1995). Predictors of university men’s number of sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 686–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. K., DiClemente, R. J., & Park, T. (1992). Predictors of condom use in sexually active adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 13, 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). National Center for STD, HIV, and TB Prevention. Health, United States.

  • Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender- related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, J. R., Perricone, P. J., Davidson, J. K, Sr, Moore, N. B., Harris, C. T., & Cotton, S. R. (2007). Sexuality and Culture, 11(2), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa-Hernandez, G., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2009). Sexual behaviors and attitudes and ethnic identity during college. The Journal of Sex Research, 46, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, R. K., Newcomb, M. D., & Allison, R. D. (2000). Predictors of Latino men’s paternity in teen pregnancy: Test of a mediational model of childhood experiences, gender role attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiene, S. M., Tennen, H., & Armeli, S. (2008). Today I’ll use a condom, but who knows about tomorrow: A daily process study in variability in predictors of condom use. Health Psychology, 27, 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, E. S., Gillen, M. M., & Shearer, C. S. (2004). Religiosity, sexual behaviors, and sexual attitudes during emerging adulthood. The Journal of Sex Research, 41, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, J. C. (1998). Gender roles and sexual behavior among young women. Sex Roles, 39, 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín, B. V., Gomez, C. A., Tschann, J. M., & Gregorich, S. E. (1997). Condom use in unmarried Latino men: A test of cultural constructs. Health Psychology, 16, 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, C., & King, E. (2006). Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: A systematic review. Lancet, 368, 151–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young, heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., Helms-Erikson, H., & Crouter, A. C. (2001). Sibling influences on gender development in middle childhood and early adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 37, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C. S., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., & Biermeier, C. (1997). Family, peer, and individual correlates of sexual experience among Caucasian and Asian American late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. M., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1992). The social context of adolescent sexuality: Safe sex implications. Journal of Adolescence, 14, 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Quackenbush, D. M. (1996). The social meaning of women’s condom use: The sexual double standard and beliefs about the meaning ascribed to condom use. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Psychological Science, 12, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2011). Gender differences in sexual attitudes and behaviors: A review of meta-analytic results and large datasets. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulerwitz, J., Amaro, H., DeJong, W., Gortmaker, S. L., & Rudd, R. (2002). Relationship power, condom use, and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care, 14, 789–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male than female control theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Heppen, J. B. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women’s interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, W. P., Rickman, R. L., Thompson, K., Levine, B., & Reed, D. L. (1993). Gender differences in AIDS-relevant condom attitudes and condom use. AIDS Education and Prevention, 5, 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say you “had sex” if…? Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 275–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., La Marche, A., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased gender risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 575–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger, M. L., Logan, T. K., & Leukefeld, C. G. (1999). Gender roles, HIV risk behaviors and perceptions of using female condoms among college students. Population Research and Policy Review, 18, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, C. S., Hosterman, S. J., Gillen, M. M., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2005). Are traditional gender role attitudes associated with risky sexual behavior and attitudes about condom use? Sex Roles, 52, 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, J. S., & Carey, M. P. (2001). Prevalence of sexual dysfunction: Results from a decade of research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 177–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D., Resick, P. A., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1980). Relationships among gender, sex-role attitudes, sexual attitudes, thoughts, and behaviors. Psychological Reports, 46, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soet, J. E., Dudley, W. N., & DiIorio, C. (1999). The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women’s sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 707–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 883–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 539–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant #R-01 HD 41720 to Eva S. Lefkowitz. We are grateful to Shelley Hosterman, Eric Loken, Susan McHale, Lisa Meyer, Kristie Patton, Lyndsey Sturm, and Amber Thompson for their help with study design, data collection, data scoring and entering, data cleaning and statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Eva S. Lefkowitz, Cindy L. Shearer, Meghan M. Gillen & Graciela Espinosa-Hernandez

Authors
  1. Eva S. Lefkowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cindy L. Shearer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meghan M. Gillen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Graciela Espinosa-Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva S. Lefkowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lefkowitz, E.S., Shearer, C.L., Gillen, M.M. et al. How Gendered Attitudes Relate to Women’s and Men’s Sexual Behaviors and Beliefs. Sexuality & Culture 18, 833–846 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9225-6

Keywords

search

Navigation