Employing Speech Codes Theory (Philipsen et al. in Theorizing about intercultural communication. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2005) as my theoretical framework, I examine communicative practices and beliefs as to what it means to speak like a drag queen as portrayed within the reality TV show RuPaul’s Drag Race (RPDR): Season Four. Examining this particular population increases knowledge on how marginalized populations use talk to construct rules of conduct for a coherent identity. Members uphold drag queen speech codes by revealing what it means to speak like a queen. Such items include to look like a “fish,” don’t be “hungry,” be humble, resist negativity, don’t complain, and exude professionalism. These are qualities and characteristics of communication that a drag queen must perform, uphold, and repeat in order to uphold drag family values, thus fulfilling the code of sisterhood that comes with the performance of drag. These are evident within beliefs and everyday talk as portrayed within RPDR.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Barnlund, D. C. (1988). Communication in a global village. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (5th ed., pp. 5–14). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Barrett, R. (1994). “She is not white woman”: The appropriation of white women’s language by African American drag queens. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liange, L. A. Sutton, & C. Hines (Eds.), Cultural performances: proceedings of the third berkeley women and language conference (pp. 1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Barrett, R. (1995a). The markedness model and style switching: Evidence from African American drag queens. In P. Silberman & J. Loftin (Eds.), SALSA II: Proceedings of the second annual symposium about language and society Austin (pp. 40–52). Austin, TX: University of Texas Department of Linguistics.
Barrett, R. (1995b). Supermodels of the world, unite!: Political economy and the language of performance among African American drag queens. In W. L. Leap (Ed.), Beyond the lavender lexicon: Authenticity, imagination, and appropriation in lesbian and gay languages (pp. 207–226). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
Barrett, R. (1997). The “homo-genius” speech community. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality (pp. 181–201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, R. (1998). Markedness and styleswitching in performances by African American drag queens. In C. Myers-Scotton (Ed.), Codes and consequences: Choosing linguistic varieties (pp. 139–161). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Basu, A. (2011). HIV/AIDS and subaltern autonomous rationality: A call to recenter health communication in marginalized sex worker spaces. Communication Monographs, 78(3), 391–408. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.58945.
Berkowitz, D., & Belgrave, L. L. (2010). “She works hard for the money”: Drag queens and their contradictory status of celebrity and marginality. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39(2), 159–186. doi:10.1177/0891241609342193.
Berkowitz, D., Belgrave, L., & Halberstein, R. A. (2007). The interaction of drag queens and gay men in the public and private spaces. Journal of Homosexuality, 53, 11–32. doi:10.1300/J082v52n03_02.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brookey, R. A., & Westerfelhaus, R. (2001). Pistols and petticoats, piety and purity: To Wong Foo, the queering of the American monomyth, and the marginalizing discourse of deification. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18, 141–156. doi:10.1080/07393180128080.
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Carbaugh, D. (1999). “Just listen”: “Listening” and landscape among the Blackfeet. Western Journal of Communication, 63, 250–270.
Carbaugh, D. A. (2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. New York: Henry Holt.
Eguchi, S. (2011). Negotiating sissy phobia: A critical/interpretive analysis of one ‘femme’ gay Asian body in the heteronormative world. Journal of Men’s Studies, 19(1), 37–56. doi:10.3149/jms.1901.37.
Franco, J. (2008). Extreme makeover the politics of gender, class, and cultural identity. Television & New Media, 9(6), 471–486. doi:10.1177/1527476408323339.
Frey, L., & Sunwolf, (2005). The symbolic-interpretive perspective of group life. In M. S. Poole & A. B. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 185–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Friedman, R. B., & Jones, A. (2011). Corsets, headpieces, and tape: An ethnography of gendered performance. Cross Cultural Commnication, 7(2), 82–91. doi:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110702.009.
Gordon, C. (2011). Impression management on reality TV: Emotion in parental accounts. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3551–3564. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.004.
Harter, L. M., Berquist, C., Titsworth, B. S., Novak, D., & Brokaw, T. (2005). The structuring of invisibility among the hidden homeless: The politics of space, stigma, and identity construction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(4), 305–327. doi:10.1080/0090988050027807.
Hogan, R. (1975). Theoretical egocentrism and the problem of compliance. American Psychologist, 30, 533–539.
Homsey, D. M., & Sandel, T. (2012). The code of food and tradition: Exploring a Lebanese (American) speech code in practice in Finland. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41, 59–80. doi:10.1080/17475759.2011.649513.
Hopkins, S. J. (2004). Let the drag race begin: The rewards of becoming a queen. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 135–149. doi:10.1300/J082v46n03_08.
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 22, 8–28. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x.
Hymes, D. (1968). The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Readings in the sociology of language (pp. 99–137). Paris: Mouton.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Katriel, T., & Philipsen, G. (1981). “What we need is communication”: “Communication” as a cultural category in some American speech. Communication Monographs, 48, 302–317.
Krijnen, T., & Tan, E. (2009). Reality TV as a moral laboratory: A dramaturgical analysis of The Golden Cage. Communications, 34(4), 449–472. doi:10.1515/COMM.2009.027.
Lindlof, R. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mann, S. L. (2011). Drag queens’ use of language and the performance of blurred gendered and racial identities. Journal of Homosexual, 58, 793–811. doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.581923.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Moreman, S. T., & McIntosh, D. M. (2010). Brown scriptings and rescriptings: A critical performance ethnography of Latina drag queens. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7, 115–135. doi:10.1080/14791421003767912.
Namaste, V. (2000). Invisible lives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Navarro, A. (2012, April 23). Why RuPaul’s drag race is the best reality show on TV right now. Retrieved from http://www.tv.com/news/why-rupauls-drag-race-is-the-best-reality-show-on-tv-right-now-28454/.
Newton, E. (1972). Mother camp: Female impersonators in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Philipsen, G. (1975). Speaking “like a man” in Teamsterville: Culture patterns of role enactments in an urban neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 13–22.
Philipsen, G. (1976). Places for speaking in Teamsterville. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 15–25.
Philipsen, G. (1990). Reflections on speaking ‘like a man’ in Teamsterville. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural communication (pp. 21–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Philipsen, G. (1997). A theory of speech codes. In G. Philipsen, & T. L. Albrecht (Eds.), Developing communication theories (pp. 119–156). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Philipsen, G., Coutu, L. M., & Covarrubias, P. (2005). Speech codes theory: Restatement, revisions, and response to criticisms. In. W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. (pp. 55–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Price, E. (2010). Reinforcing the myth: Constructing Australian identity in ‘reality TV’. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 24, 451–459. doi:10.1080/10304311003703157.
Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., & Shapiro, E. L. (2010). Drag queens and drag kings: The difference gender makes. Sexualities, 13, 275–294. doi:10.1177/1363490709352725.
Schacht, S. P. (2004). Beyond the boundaries of the classroom: Teaching about gender and sexuality at a drag show. Journal of Homosexuality, 46, 225–240. doi:10.1300/JK082v45n03_14.
Shumaker, J. (2012). Logo’s season debut of “RuPaul’s Drag Race” on Monday night scores as the highest-rated premiere in network history. Retrieved from http://logo.to/xr3gHp.
Shumaker, J., & Slane, J. (2011a). Halleloo! “RuPaul’s Drag Race” returns to Logo for a new season of outrageous reality competition in January 2012. Retrieved from http://logo.to/s6k7Wu.
Shumaker, J., & Slane, J. (2011b). “RuPaul’s Drag Race” fourth season premier sashays onto Logo Monday January 30th. Retrieved from http://logo.to/u2CIv1.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2004). Chicks with dicks, men in dresses: What it means to be a drag queen. Journal of Homosexuality, 46, 113–133. doi:10.1300/J082v46n03_07.
Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (2005). When the girls are men: Negotiating gender and sexual dynamics in a study of drag queens. Signs, 30(4), 2115–2139. doi:10.1086/428421.
Tewksbury, R. (1994). Men performing as women: Explorations in the world of female impersonators. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 465–486.
Ward, M, Sr. (2010). “I was saved at an early age”: An ethnography of fundamentalist speech and cultural performance. Journal of Communication and Religion, 33, 108–144.
Zervigon, A. M. (2009). Drag shows: Drag queens and female impersonators. In GLBTQ Arts online encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://www.glbtq.com/arts/drag_queens.html.
About this article
Cite this article
Simmons, N. Speaking Like a Queen in RuPaul’s Drag Race: Towards a Speech Code of American Drag Queens. Sexuality & Culture 18, 630–648 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9213-2
- Drag queens
- Speech codes theory
- Group communication
- Reality TV
- Social interaction